Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide

The Impacts of Technology‐Enabled Coproduction on Equity in Public Service Delivery

Bibliographic Data

ID6358385
AuthorsCorey Kewei Xu (0000-0002-3244-9297, Florida State University, corresponding author), Tian Tang (0000-0002-7057-8196, Florida State University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume80
Issue6
Pages962-975
Publication date2020-09-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/puar.13222
OpenAlexW3083654246
LanguageEN
Citations received48
References cited74

This article investigates how 311 systems affect distributional equity in public service delivery. Many local governments in the United States have adopted interactive 311 platforms to engage citizens in coproduction. Using a novel household‐level data set on 311 service requests and power service restoration in the City of Tallahassee, Florida, after Hurricane Michael in 2018, the authors examine possible disparities between racial minority groups and nonminorities in making power service restoration requests via 311. The article further analyzes how coproduction participation through 311 affects distributional equity in power restoration. The findings show that minority groups are more likely to utilize these smart technologies to submit requests for essential services after disasters, as they may have greater needs but less political capital to reach out to the government. Their utilization of e‐governance technologies has helped them gain more attention from the government, which narrows the equity gap in service delivery

Business · Coproduction · Corporate governance · Equity (law · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public service · Service (business · Service delivery framework · E-Government and Public Services · Finance · Marketing · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Media and Politics

  • From Registration to Activation

    Open Access•Elina De Simone, Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta et al.•Public Organization Review•2026

  • How Does Corruption Control Shape Administrative Burden on Businesses? The Moderating Role of Political Attention and Digital Government

    Yongzheng Yang•Public Performance & Management…•2026

  • Digital economy and institutional dynamics

    Open Access•YuWen Lyu, S Blankenhorn et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Resilience in complex disasters

    Open Access•Tian Tang, Tian Luo et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • From recovery resilience to transformative resilience

    Yongdong Shen, Yuan Cheng et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • Making sense of the digital co-production of welfare services

    Karl Kristian Larsson, Tale Skjølsvik•Public Management Review•2023

  • Bureaucratic encounter, voice behaviour and citizen satisfaction

    Juan Du, Xufeng Zhu•Public Management Review•2024

  • Perceptions, motivators and barriers of using city management applications among citizens

    Open Access•Catherine Annis, Jinghui Hou et al.•Information Technology and People•2021

  • Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development

    Open Access•Jiapeng Dai, Aisha Azhar•Public Administration and…•2024

  • Public Service Delivery on Mobile Apps

    Heewon Lee•International Journal of Public…•2024

  • Designing data policy and governance for smart cities

    Open Access•Fernando Filgueiras, Bárbara Silva•Revista de Administração Pública•2022

  • Desenhando políticas e governança de dados para cidades inteligentes

    Open Access•Fernando Filgueiras, Bárbara Silva•Revista de Administração Pública•2022

  • A data framework for assessing social inequality and equity in multi‐sector social, ecological, infrastructural urban systems

    Open Access•Lara P Clark, Samuel Tabory et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2022

  • Unpacking digital co-production - A scenario-based framework for comparing digital public services

    Open Access•Huanming Wang, Qiyu Shi et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2026

  • Exploring the impact of external rewards on e-government services adoption

    Open Access•Sabreen Abulhaija, Marta F Arroyabe et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation

    Léon Acar, Trui Steen et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • Challenges and opportunities for equity in public management

    Lihi Lahat, Regev Nathansohn•Public Management Review•2025

  • Digital resilience in wartime

    Open Access•Gulsanna Mamediieva, Donald Moynihan et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • How Do Disadvantaged Groups Seek Information About Public Services? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Communication Technologies

    Open Access•K Linos, Melissa Carlson et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Do monetary or nonmonetary incentives promote citizens' use of a government crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Danbee Lee, Yeonkyung Kim et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • Community‐Oriented or Self‐Interested? Citizen Motivations for Engaging in Digital Coproduction

    Open Access•Vishal Trehan, Gregory A Porumbescu et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Digital Administrative Burdens

    Open Access•Rik Peeters•Perspectives on Public Management…•2023

  • Measuring progress of smart cities

    Open Access•Calvin Ming Tsun Lai, Alistair Cole•Urban Governance•2022

  • Equity in ICT-Based Coproduction

    Open Access•Andreas D Sihotang•Information Polity•2026

  • Promoting citizens’ willingness to participate in coproduction

    Y Q Wang, Pan Zhang et al.•Journal of Asian Public Policy•2025

  • Policy Analysis of Instrument Design

    Cali Curley, Richard Feiock et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2020

  • From private platforms to public value

    Open Access•Francesca Casalini, Liudmila Zavolokina•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Why coproduce? Citizens' perspectives on the costs and benefits of technology-enabled coproduction

    Open Access•Heewon Lee, Dongfang Gaozhao et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • Digital transparency and citizen participation

    Open Access•Boyuan Zhao, Shaoming Cheng et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • ICT-based co-production and democracy

    Open Access•Kristina Muhhina•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Influence of citizen relationship management system on citizen participation in Taiwan

    Open Access•Wei‐ning Wu, Wei-Ning Wu•Cities•2024

  • Governance

    Open Access•Jeremy L Hall•Public Administration Review•2021

  • The implications of Covid-19 for concepts and practices of citizenship

    M Jae Moon, B Shine Cho•Policy & Politics•2022

  • The role of ICT tool interactivity on citizen e-participation in public service provision

    Fadong Zhang, Bingsheng Liu et al.•Journal of Chinese Governance•2025

  • Digital government inclusion

    Open Access•Rik Peeters, Susan M Miller et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Urban social sustainability and arboreal lived heritage in a West African capital city

    Open Access•Liora Bigon, Joseph Adeniran Adedeji•Geoforum•2025

  • From address-less to electorally included

    Open Access•Maiara Oliveira Marinho, Maiara Marinho et al.•Cities•2025

  • The digital divide in shared bicycle use

    Open Access•Weijia Liu, Corey Kewei Xu et al.•Cities•2025

  • Smart governance for affordable housing in China

    Open Access•Wanxia Zhao, Yonghua Zou•Cities•2024

  • Body‐worn cameras and representation

    Open Access•James E Wright, Dongfang Gaozhao et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Platform Government in the Era of Smart Technology

    Open Access•Soonhee Kim, Kim Normann Andersen et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • The Umbrella Metaphor

    Open Access•R Paul Battaglio, Jeremy L Hall•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Moving from coproduction to commonization of digital public goods and services

    Open Access•Sébastien Shulz•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Does collective citizen input impact government service provision? Evidence from SeeClickFix requests

    Open Access•Kaylyn Jackson Schiff•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Can Cash Incentives Reduce Syringe Litter? Evidence From Boston's 311 Service Requests

    Open Access•Angie Nga Le, Boyuan Zhao et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Potholes, 311 reports, and a theory of heterogeneous resident demand for city services

    Open Access•Scott J Cook, Samantha Zuhlke et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  • Dog fouling and potholes

    Open Access•Peter Matthews, Alex Parsons et al.•Local Government Studies•2023

  • Smart Interaction vs. Face-to-Face? Evidence from a Survey Experiment on Perceived Government Responsiveness in China

    Open Access•Huanhuan Li, Limei Gu et al.•Journal of Chinese Political…•2025

  • Participation in America

    Norman H Nie, Sidney Verba•Participation in America•1987

  • Digital Divide

    Open Access•P Norris•Digital Divide•2001

  • Negative Binomial Regression

    Open Access•Joseph M Hilbe•Negative Binomial Regression•2011

  • Engaging Public Sector Clients

    Open Access•Jonathan Alford, John Alford•Engaging Public Sector Clients•2009

  • Digital government and public management research

    Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Sharon S Dawes et al.•Public Management Review•2018

  • Planning for Housing Recovery? Lessons Learned From Hurricane Andrew

    Yang Zhang, Walter Gillis Peacock•Journal of the American Planning…•2009

  • Disaster and Recovery

    R Olshansky, Robert B Olshansky et al.•Natural Hazards Review•2012

  • The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation

    Open Access•Veiko Lember, Taco Brandsen et al.•Public Management Review•2019

  • Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation

    Open Access•Elaine B Sharp•Midwest Review of Public…•1980

  • Institutionalised Co-production

    Anuradha Joshi, Mick Moore•The Journal of Development Studies•2004

  • The Distribution of an Urban Public Service

    Open Access•Kenneth R Mladenka•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1989

  • Need, Awareness, and Contacting Propensity

    Open Access•Elaine B Sharp•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1984

  • Distributional Considerations in Models of Government Service Provision

    Open Access•Bryan D Jones•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1977

  • The New Face of Government

    John Clayton Thomas•Journal of Public Administration…•2003

  • FixMyStreet Brussels

    Burak Pak, Alvin Chua et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2017

  • Citizen Representation in City Government-Driven Crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Benjamin Y Clark, Jeffrey L Brudney•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2018

  • Governing the smart city

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer et al.•International Review of…•2016

  • Internet skills and the digital divide

    Open Access•Alexander J A M Van Deursen, Alexander van Deursen et al.•New Media & Society•2010

  • Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool

    Open Access•Maddalena Sorrentino, Mariafrancesca Sicilia et al.•Policy and Society•2018

  • Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services

    Open Access•Daniela V Dimitrova, Yu-Che Chen et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2006

  • Who Participates and Why

    Open Access•Lori M Weber, Alysha Loumakis et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2003

  • Dual effects of the internet on political activism

    Open Access•Taehyun Nam•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • Customer agility and responsiveness through big data analytics for public value creation

    Open Access•Akemi Takeoka Chatfield, Christopher G Reddick•Government Information Quarterly•2017

  • The changing face of a city government

    Open Access•Taehyun Nam, Theresa A Pardo•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • From e-government to we-government

    Open Access•Dennis Linders•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • A path-dependence perspective on the adoption of Internet of Things

    Open Access•Tian Tang, Alfred Tat‐kei Ho et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • E-governance innovation

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Revisit the drivers and barriers to e-governance in the mobile age

    Tian Tang, Jinghui Hou et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2019

  • A Public Management Road Less Travelled

    Open Access•Jonathan Alford, John Alford•Australian Journal of Public…•1998

  • Does Technologically Enabled Citizen Participation Lead to Budget Adjustments? An Investigation of Boston, MA, and San Francisco, CA

    Open Access•Benjamin Y Clark, Tatyana Guzman et al.•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach

    Open Access•Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•The American Review of Public…•2012

  • Do Advanced Information Technologies Produce Equitable Government Responses in Coproduction

    Open Access•Benjamin Y Clark, Jeffrey L Brudney et al.•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • When Political Science Championed Public Service Training

    Open Access•Hindy Lauer Schachter•The American Review of Public…•2007

  • The Geography of Exclusion

    D T Lichter, Domenico Parisi et al.•Social Problems•2012

  • The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance

    Open Access•Sharon S Dawes•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Citizenship and Service Delivery

    Charles H Levine, Glenn Fisher et al.•Public Administration Review•1984

  • Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Racial Stratification and the Durable Tangle of Neighborhood Inequality

    Open Access•Robert J Sampson•The Annals of the American…•2009

  • Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina

    Open Access•J R Elliott, Jeremy Pais•Social Science Research•2006

  • Urban Policy Making and Subjective Service Evaluations

    Jeffrey L Brudney, Robert E England•Public Administration Review•1982

  • Separate Societies

    Open Access•Stephen Steinberg•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2012

  • Explaining Citizen-Initiated Contacts with Municipal Bureaucrats

    Open Access•John Clayton Thomas, Julia Melkers•Urban Affairs Review•1999

  • Nyc 311

    Open Access•Scott L Minkoff•Urban Affairs Review•2016

  • Service Delivery Rules and the Distribution of Local Government Services

    Bryan D Jones, Saadia R Greenberg et al.•The Journal of Politics•1978

  • Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery

    Open Access•Morten Jakobsen, Simon Calmar Andersen•Public Administration Review•2013

  • Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction

    Open Access•Taco Brandsen, Marlies Honingh•Public Administration Review•2015

  • E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government

    Open Access•Soonhee Kim, Jooho Lee•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Varieties of Participation in Public Services

    Open Access•Tina Nabatchi, Alessandro Sancino et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology

    Open Access•Benjamin Y Clark, Jeffrey L Brudney et al.•Public Administration Review•2013

  • Citizen, Customer, Partner

    Open Access•John Clayton Thomas•Public Administration Review•2013

  • E‐Government 2020

    Open Access•Donald F Norris•Public Administration Review•2010

  • Coproduction

    Gordon P Whitaker•Public Administration Review•1980

  • The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation

    Open Access•Fredrik M Sjoberg, Jonathan Mellon et al.•Public Administration Review•2017

  • Information and Political Engagement in America

    Bruce Bimber•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation

    Open Access•Samuel J Best, Brian S Krueger•Political Behavior•2005

  • Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services

    Open Access•Roger B Parks, Paula Baker et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1981

  • Online Participation and Mobilisation in Britain

    Ward, Simon Ward•Parliamentary Affairs•2003

  • Uncharted Territoriality in Coproduction

    Daniel Tumminelli O''Brien, Dietmar Offenhuber et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2016

  • Citizen-initiated Contacts with Government Agencies

    John Clayton Thomas•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States

    Open Access•Brian S Krueger•American Politics Research•2002

  • Beyond Engagement and Participation

    Open Access•T Bovaird•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Crossing the great divide

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•World Development•1996

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • The digital production gap

    Open Access•Jen Schradie•Poetics•2011

  • Citizen-Initiated Contacting of Government Officials and Socioeconomic Status

    Open Access•Elaine B Sharp•American Political Science Review•1982

  • Process guidelines for establishing Intercoder Reliability in qualitative studies

    Open Access•Catherine Macphail, Nomhle Khoza et al.•Qualitative Research•2016

  • Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews

    Open Access•Gary Shaffer, John L Campbell et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2013

  • Social Implications of the Internet

    P Dimaggio, Eszter Hargittai et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2001

Unique citing works48
Citations per year8
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 48
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae