Pay‐for‐Success Development in the United States
Feasible or Failing to Launch
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6359509 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carolyn J Heinrich (0000-0002-7731-9138, Vanderbilt University, autor correspondente), Sarah E Kabourek (0000-0001-8256-697X, NORC at the University of Chicago, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 867-879 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-09-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/puar.13099 |
| OpenAlex | W2971790805 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
Social impact bonds, known as pay‐for‐success (PFS) initiatives in the United States, have attracted attention as a novel strategy for financing and providing preventive services to the most vulnerable populations. This article provides an exploratory qualitative analysis of the Preschool PFS Feasibility Pilot grant applications and projects initiated by the U.S. Department of Education to encourage state and local exploration of PFS for implementing high‐quality preschool programs. Drawing on the public administration evidence base that informs PFS design, the authors examine the feasibility pilots’ features and investigate why grant applicants saw PFS as a promising strategy for achieving their preschool program goals. The challenges encountered, lessons learned, and perceived viability of fully executed PFS preschool programs are also discussed. Findings show that few projects are advancing toward formal PFS arrangements, with many struggling to overcome constrained capacities, structural and political barriers, and inherent incentives to minimize risk and loss
Business · Economics · Incentive · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · State (computer science · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects
Contracting for Social Programs
The promise and performance of social impact bonds
Contractual acrobatics
Resilience in public service partnerships
Implementation Drivers of Pay-for-Success Projects
Social impact bond- ing ? Evidence on interorganizational relationships in social impact bonds across the United Kingdom
Developing a power perspective on public service contracting
The National Governance and Policy Context of Social Impact Bond Emergence
Beyond “make” or “buy”
Limits to the financialisation of the state
The performance of performance-based contracting in public outsourcing
Valuing a new “good”
Investing in crime prevention after the crisis
Social Public Purchasing
Ordo Ab Chao? Complexity and Its Implications
Finance interrupted
Are Social Impact Bonds an Innovation in Finance or Do They Help Finance Social Innovation
Persistence and Fadeout in the Impacts of Child and Adolescent Interventions
Private finance for public goods
The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program
Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution
Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector
A Policy Outcomes Comparison
Surveying the SIB economy
The razor’s edge
Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems
Exploring the relationship between performance management and program impact
Performance-Based Contracting in Social Welfare Programs
What’s Measured Is What Matters
The Hollowing Out of the State
Effective Contract Implementation and Management
Privatization and Its Reverse
The Middle Aging of New Public Management
Testing How Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management
Evaluating social impact bonds
A Public Management for All Seasons
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,43 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |