Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

It’s Not Just Trump

Americans of Both Parties Support Liberal Democratic Norm Violations More Under Their Own President

Bibliographic Data

ID6371981
AuthorsLevente Littvay (0000-0003-2022-6886, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences Research Professor, , Budapest, ; and Senior Research Fellow, , Budapest), Jennifer L Mccoy (0000-0003-2217-4493, Department of Political Science, Georgia State University Regent’s Professor, , Atlanta, GA), Jennifer Mccoy (0000-0001-5844-2504), Gábor Simonovits (0000-0002-9263-745X, Department of Political Science, Central European University Associate Professor, , Vienna, ; and Senior Research Fellow, , Budapest)
Year2024
Volume88
Issue3
Pages1044-1058
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/poq/nfae042
PMID39720165
OpenAlexW4403664084
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited32

There is a growing worry about the health of American democracy, and political scientists and pundits alike are looking for possible explanations. Surveys conducted during the Trump presidency showed considerable citizen support for liberal democratic norm erosions, especially among Republicans. However, recent experimental research also shows that voters of both parties are more tolerant of norm erosion committed by politicians of the party they prefer. In this note, we aim to reconcile these contradictory findings by analyzing surveys spanning from 2006 to 2021 on the public’s tolerance of executive concentration of power. We also collect original data under both the Trump and Biden administrations gauging support for a broad array of liberal democratic norm erosions. Support for such erosions, in fact, has been relatively similar across Democrats and Republicans once we account for the party of the president. Support for executive aggrandizement has been prevalent among supporters of the president’s party at least since the second term of the Bush administration. Increased checks and balances on the executive, through divided government, amplifies this effect further. Taken together, these findings suggest that universal support for the liberal democratic status quo has been weaker among those who support the president’s party, well before and since the Trump presidency

Democracy · Executive branch · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential system · Status quo · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Law · Public Administration

  • Lessons in division and unity

    Open Access•István Benedek•Journal of Contemporary Central…•2026

  • Democratic Accountability in East Asia

    Open Access•Woo Chang Kang, Sunkyoung Park et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • Partisan or Principled? Explaining Political Differences in Attitudes About Violations of Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Paul E Teas•Personality and Social Psychology…•2025

  • Fueling the fire

    Open Access•Monique Mitchell Turner, Ellen C Reinhart et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • Beyond the Trump Presidency

    Open Access•J Ferrer, Christopher Palmisano•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2025

  • Democratic hypocrisy in practice

    Open Access•Ben Stanley•East European Politics•2026

  • (Don't) fear the bad leader

    Open Access•Robert Metz•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation

    Open Access•Robert Metz, Bendegúz Plesz•Politics and Governance•2025

  • Polarizing transition? Opposition strategies and the rise of Péter Magyar and the respect and freedom party (Tisza) in Hungary

    Open Access•István Benedek•Comparative European Politics•2026

  • Moral justification for misinformation

    Open Access•Tevfik Murat Yildirim•Party Politics•2025

  • There and back again

    Nadine Sika, Balázs Szent-Iványi•Democratization•2026

  • Are Citizens Vigilant of Changing the Balance of Power? Testing Evaluations of Checks and Balances Reforms

    Open Access•Honorata Mazepus•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The populist voter trap

    Open Access•Andrea Szabó, Áron Szabó et al.•Post-Soviet Affairs•2026

  • Beyond Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Kutsal Yesilkagit, Johan Christensen•Governance•2026

  • Mind the Gap

    Open Access•Lars Erik Berntzen, Cornelius Cappelen et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington, Jonathan D Weiler•Authoritarianism and Polarization…•2009

  • Movements and Parties

    Open Access•Sidney Tarrow•Movements and Parties•2021

  • Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

    John Michael Carey, Katherine Clayton et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2022

  • Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock, Oliver Mcclellan•Research & Politics•2019

  • In Europe, Democracy Erodes from the Right

    Open Access•Milan W Svolik, Elena Avramovska et al.•Journal of democracy•2023

  • Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018

    Open Access•Alexander Wuttke, Konstantin Gavras et al.•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • Democratic Hypocrisy and Out-Group Threat

    Gábor Simonovits, Jennifer Mccoy et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • The Limits of Partisan Prejudice

    Yphtach Lelkes, Sean J Westwood et al.•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • The Americas

    Open Access•Michael Albertus, G Grossman•Journal of democracy•2021

  • Polarization versus Democracy

    Open Access•Milan W Svolik•Journal of democracy•2019

  • The Signs of Deconsolidation

    Open Access•Roberto S Foa, Yascha Mounk•Journal of democracy•2017

  • The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Elisabeth Gidengil, Dietlind Stolle et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • How Voters Respond to Presidential Assaults on Checks and Balances

    Open Access•Aytuğ Şaşmaz, Alper H Yagci et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Standing up for Democracy? Explaining Citizens’ Support for Democratic Checks and Balances

    Open Access•Honorata Mazepus, Dimiter Toshkov•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Joshua L Kalla et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Winners’ Consent? Citizen Commitment to Democracy When Illiberal Candidates Win Elections

    Open Access•Mollie J Cohen, A E Smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Michele F Margolis et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Why Don't Partisans Sanction Electoral Malpractice

    Open Access•Laurits F Aarslew•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies

    Open Access•Jennifer Mccoy, Murat Somer•The Annals of the American…•2019

  • "Good Citizens" in Democratic Hard Times

    Open Access•W Goodman, Sara Wallace Goodman•The Annals of the American…•2022

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Rationalizing Democracy

    Open Access•Suthan Krishnarajan•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America

    Open Access•Michael Barber, John Collins Pope•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Democracy, Public Support, and Measurement Uncertainty

    Open Access•Yuehong ‘cassandra’ Tai, Yue Hu et al.•American Political Science Review•2024

  • In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion

    Open Access•Christopher Claassen•American Political Science Review•2020

Unique citing works15
Citations per year15
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae