It’s Not Just Trump
Americans of Both Parties Support Liberal Democratic Norm Violations More Under Their Own President
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6371981 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Levente Littvay (0000-0003-2022-6886, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences Research Professor, , Budapest, ; and Senior Research Fellow, , Budapest), Jennifer L Mccoy (0000-0003-2217-4493, Department of Political Science, Georgia State University Regent’s Professor, , Atlanta, GA), Jennifer Mccoy (0000-0001-5844-2504), Gábor Simonovits (0000-0002-9263-745X, Department of Political Science, Central European University Associate Professor, , Vienna, ; and Senior Research Fellow, , Budapest) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1044-1058 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfae042 |
| PMID | 39720165 |
| OpenAlex | W4403664084 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 32 |
There is a growing worry about the health of American democracy, and political scientists and pundits alike are looking for possible explanations. Surveys conducted during the Trump presidency showed considerable citizen support for liberal democratic norm erosions, especially among Republicans. However, recent experimental research also shows that voters of both parties are more tolerant of norm erosion committed by politicians of the party they prefer. In this note, we aim to reconcile these contradictory findings by analyzing surveys spanning from 2006 to 2021 on the public’s tolerance of executive concentration of power. We also collect original data under both the Trump and Biden administrations gauging support for a broad array of liberal democratic norm erosions. Support for such erosions, in fact, has been relatively similar across Democrats and Republicans once we account for the party of the president. Support for executive aggrandizement has been prevalent among supporters of the president’s party at least since the second term of the Bush administration. Increased checks and balances on the executive, through divided government, amplifies this effect further. Taken together, these findings suggest that universal support for the liberal democratic status quo has been weaker among those who support the president’s party, well before and since the Trump presidency
Democracy · Executive branch · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential system · Status quo · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Law · Public Administration
Lessons in division and unity
Democratic Accountability in East Asia
Partisan or Principled? Explaining Political Differences in Attitudes About Violations of Democratic Norms
Fueling the fire
Beyond the Trump Presidency
Democratic hypocrisy in practice
(Don't) fear the bad leader
The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation
Polarizing transition? Opposition strategies and the rise of Péter Magyar and the respect and freedom party (Tisza) in Hungary
Moral justification for misinformation
There and back again
Are Citizens Vigilant of Changing the Balance of Power? Testing Evaluations of Checks and Balances Reforms
The populist voter trap
Beyond Democratic Backsliding
Mind the Gap
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
Movements and Parties
Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters
Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy
Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents
In Europe, Democracy Erodes from the Right
Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018
Democratic Hypocrisy and Out-Group Threat
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies
The Americas
Polarization versus Democracy
The Signs of Deconsolidation
The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding
How Voters Respond to Presidential Assaults on Checks and Balances
Standing up for Democracy? Explaining Citizens’ Support for Democratic Checks and Balances
Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
Winners’ Consent? Citizen Commitment to Democracy When Illiberal Candidates Win Elections
Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys
Why Don't Partisans Sanction Electoral Malpractice
Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies
"Good Citizens" in Democratic Hard Times
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
Rationalizing Democracy
Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America
Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
Democracy, Public Support, and Measurement Uncertainty
In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 15 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |