Do we really want to know? The journey to implement empirical research recommendations in the ICRC's responses in Myanmar and Lebanon
Bibliographic Data
Efforts to reduce the gap between the research evidence base and humanitarian responses have focused on producing quality evidence and ensuring its use in decision‐making. Yet, how evidence translates into field‐level implementation is not well understood in humanitarian contexts. This study analysed how recommendations produced through academic research partnerships were implemented by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Lebanon and Myanmar. The methodology included: social network analysis to represent collective dynamics; document reviews to assess implementation; qualitative interviews to comprehend why actors engaged; and a critical appraisal of these combined results. The application of Extended Normalization Process Theory provided information on ‘anticipation of constraints’ (access to information, staff turnover, context specificity, and the need to engage as a cohesive group). Future research efforts should concentrate explicitly on identifying and tackling implementation barriers such as power imbalances and ethical dilemmas related to service delivery by humanitarian actors
Anticipation (artificial intelligence · Context (archaeology · Critical appraisal · Normalization (sociology · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Global Security and Public Health · Medicine · Peacebuilding and International Security
Implementation, context and complexity
The dark side of coproduction
Natural Disasters, Armed Conflict, and Public Health
Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises
Towards a general theory of implementation
Diffusion of innovations in the public sector
Theorizing the organization and management of non-governmental development organizations
Partnerships in global health and collaborative governance
A narrative review of health research capacity strengthening in low and middle-income countries
Does the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative (Sort IT) continue to influence health policy and/or practice
An institution standing the test of time? A review of 150 years of the history of the International Committee of the Red Cross
Conducting operational research in humanitarian settings
Improving mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in humanitarian settings
Syrian refugees in Lebanon
Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings
Utilization of primary health care services among Syrian refugee and Lebanese women targeted by the ICRC program in Lebanon
Having more women humanitarian leaders will help transform the humanitarian system”
From Science to Policy and Practice
A case-control study of musculoskeletal impairment
The space between us
Beyond 'Do No Harm
Leadership in Social Work
Introduction
Interactive research and the construction of knowledge in conflict-affected settings
Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |