Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Effects of a Prepaid Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rates and Response Quality in a Face-to-Face Survey

Bibliographic Data

ID7362733
AuthorsDiane K Willimack, Howard Schuman, Beth-Ellen Pennell, James M Lepkowski
Year1995
Volume59
Issue1
Pages78-78
Publication date1995-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/269459
OpenAlexW2119256537
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited10

Journal Article EFFECTS OF A PREPAID NONMONETARY INCENTIVE ON RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN A FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY Get access DIANE K. WILLIMACK, DIANE K. WILLIMACK DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar HOWARD SCHUMAN, HOWARD SCHUMAN DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar BETH-ELLEN PENNELL, BETH-ELLEN PENNELL DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 59, Issue 1, SPRING 1995, Pages 78–92, https://doi.org/10.1086/269459 Published: 01 January 1995

Economics · Face (sociological concept · Incentive · Library science · Management · Political science · Public relations · Research center · Social research · Social science · Sociology · Law · Psychology of Social Influence · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • Calidad, confianza y participación en encuestas

    Open Access•Angeles Cea De Ancona•Papers Revista de Sociologia•2022

  • A Telescope on Society

    Open Access•James S House, Eleanor Singer et al.•A telescope on society•2004

  • An Assessment of the KDICP and MDICP Data Quality

    Open Access•Simona Bignami, Georges Reniers et al.•Demographic Research•2003

  • Paying drug users to take part in research

    Toby Seddon•Addiction Research & Theory•2005

  • The Allocation of Male and Female Occupational Prestige in an Ontario Urban Area

    Open Access•John Goyder, Neil Guppy et al.•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2003

  • Survey Incentives

    Erica Ryu•International Journal of Public…•2005

  • GIS without GPS

    Open Access•Petterson Molina Vales, Marcelo C C Stabile•Population and Environment•2016

  • La no respuesta en encuestas presenciales realizadas en España

    Open Access•Vidal Díaz De Rada•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2013

  • The Forgotten Work of Cultural Workers

    K Bischoping, Adam D K King et al.•Labour / Le Travail•2019

  • Comparación de las tasas de respuesta en el uso combinado de modalidades de encuesta

    Open Access•Vidal Díaz De Rada, Jose Luís Palacios Gómez•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • Incidencias de la entrevista personal en la investigación mediante encuesta

    Open Access•Adoración Núñez Villuendas•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • The Effect of Large Monetary Incentives on Survey Completion

    Joanne W Hsu, Maximilian D Schmeiser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • Examining the Relationship Between Nonresponse Propensity and Data Quality in Two National Household Surveys

    Scott Fricker, Roger Tourangeau•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Prepaid Monetary Incentives and Data Quality in Face-to-Face Interviews

    Michael Davern, Todd Rockwood et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2003

  • Nonresponse Error, Measurement Error, And Mode Of Data Collection

    Joseph W Sakshaug, Ting Yan et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel Survey

    J L Zagorsky, Jay Zagorsky et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys

    Paul M Sniderman, Douglas B Grob•Annual Review of Sociology•1996

  • Effect of Participation Incentives on the Composition of National Health Surveys

    Open Access•Anne Moyer, Margaret Brown•Journal of Health Psychology•2008

  • The Effect of Differential Incentives on Attrition Bias

    Open Access•Barbara Felderer, Gerrit Müller et al.•CAM•2018

  • Prepaid vs. Promised Monetary Incentives to Questionnaire Response

    C D Schewe, N G Cournoyer•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires

    Thomas A Heberlein, R Baumgartner•American Sociological Review•1978

  • Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior

    Francis J Yammarino, Steven J Skinner et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1991

  • Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates

    Jeannine M James, Richard Bolstein•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Increasing the Responses to Mail Questionnaires

    William M Kephart, Marvin Bressler•Public Opinion Quarterly•1958

  • Mail Survey Response Rate

    Richard J Fox, Melvin R Crask et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1988

  • The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-Up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys

    Jeannine M James, Richard Bolstein•Public Opinion Quarterly•1990

  • Incentives for Increasing Return Rates

    J Scott Mizes, E Louis Fleece et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1984

  • The Consequences of Large Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys of Elites

    R Kenneth Godwin•Public Opinion Quarterly•1979

  • The Norm of Reciprocity

    Alvin W Gouldner•American Sociological Review•1960

Unique citing works19
Citations per year0,63
Citation span1996 - 2024 (29)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae