Effects of a Prepaid Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rates and Response Quality in a Face-to-Face Survey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7362733 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diane K Willimack, Howard Schuman, Beth-Ellen Pennell, James M Lepkowski |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 78-78 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/269459 |
| OpenAlex | W2119256537 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 10 |
Journal Article EFFECTS OF A PREPAID NONMONETARY INCENTIVE ON RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN A FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY Get access DIANE K. WILLIMACK, DIANE K. WILLIMACK DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar HOWARD SCHUMAN, HOWARD SCHUMAN DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar BETH-ELLEN PENNELL, BETH-ELLEN PENNELL DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI DIANE K. WILLIMACK is a survey methodologist at the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HOWARD SCHUMAN is professor of sociology and research scientist at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. BETH-ELLEN PENNELL is director of the Field Section, Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. JAMES M. LEPKOWSKI is senior study director at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. The authors acknowledge Professor John Goyder for discussions that initially stimulated this research. They also thank Charlotte Steeh, director of the Detroit Area Study, for assisting with implementation of the experiment, Heather L. Hewitt for managing the study for the Survey Research Center, and Professor Willard Rodgers for guidance in the early analysis on data quality. Support for the survey was provided by Grant AGO8951-O2 from the National Institute of Aging. Funds for the incentive experiment were provided by the Survey Research Center and the Institute for Social Research. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 59, Issue 1, SPRING 1995, Pages 78–92, https://doi.org/10.1086/269459 Published: 01 January 1995
Economics · Face (sociological concept · Incentive · Library science · Management · Political science · Public relations · Research center · Social research · Social science · Sociology · Law · Psychology of Social Influence · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Calidad, confianza y participación en encuestas
A Telescope on Society
An Assessment of the KDICP and MDICP Data Quality
Paying drug users to take part in research
The Allocation of Male and Female Occupational Prestige in an Ontario Urban Area
Survey Incentives
GIS without GPS
La no respuesta en encuestas presenciales realizadas en España
The Forgotten Work of Cultural Workers
Comparación de las tasas de respuesta en el uso combinado de modalidades de encuesta
Incidencias de la entrevista personal en la investigación mediante encuesta
The Effect of Large Monetary Incentives on Survey Completion
Examining the Relationship Between Nonresponse Propensity and Data Quality in Two National Household Surveys
Prepaid Monetary Incentives and Data Quality in Face-to-Face Interviews
Nonresponse Error, Measurement Error, And Mode Of Data Collection
The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel Survey
Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys
Effect of Participation Incentives on the Composition of National Health Surveys
The Effect of Differential Incentives on Attrition Bias
Prepaid vs. Promised Monetary Incentives to Questionnaire Response
Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires
Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior
Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates
Increasing the Responses to Mail Questionnaires
Mail Survey Response Rate
The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-Up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys
Incentives for Increasing Return Rates
The Consequences of Large Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys of Elites
The Norm of Reciprocity
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,63 |
| Citation span | 1996 - 2024 (29) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |