Response to Damianos—Anthropocene angst
Authentic geology and stratigraphic sincerity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7393276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colin N Waters (0000-0001-6113-8730, University of Leicester), J Zalasiewicz (0000-0002-3220-4855, University of Leicester), Martin J Head (0000-0003-3026-5483, Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada), Gary N Schafer (0000-0002-8382-734X, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology), Francine Mg Mccarthy (0000-0001-5038-8355, Department of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada), D Turner (0000-0001-5603-8145), Simon D Turner (0000-0001-8692-8210, University College London, London, UK) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 465-478 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Studies of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-3127 • E-ISSN: 1460-3659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03063127251343046 |
| PMID | 40485059 |
| OpenAlex | W4411130897 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Damianos provides his views on the significance of the March 2024 decision by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) to reject the proposal of the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), the body we represent, to formalize the Anthropocene as a series/epoch of the Geological Time Scale. He draws upon ‘four years of ethnographic observation’ of the AWG, over which time this body provided him with access to its meetings and discussions. Given this access, the numerous misrepresentations within his article warrant redress. Ultimately, his conclusions mimic claims of influential figures within the governing bodies of the stratigraphic process: that the AWG were attempting to formalize the Anthropocene for political reasons and subvert the process through use of the media, and that the proposed definition was based upon claims about the future and not the past geological record. We refute those accusations, and emphasize that the proposed Anthropocene epoch, based on scrupulous and detailed analysis of the stratigraphic record, demonstrates striking and transformative Earth System change driven by the mid-20th century ‘Great Acceleration’ of human activities
Anthropocene · Archaeology · Environmental ethics · Sincerity · Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies · History · Marine and environmental studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Geology · Paleontology
The “Anthropocene” epoch
Formal subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch
Formal ratification of the subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch (Quaternary System/Period)
Geology of mankind
Anthropocene angst
Holocene jurisprudence
The Anthropocene
Candidate sites and other reference sections for the Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point of the Anthropocene series
Evidence and experiment
The trajectory of the Anthropocene
High-resolution analysis of the varved succession at Crawford lake across the base of the proposed Crawfordian stage and Anthropocene series
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |