Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Real Interpretative Differences to Assess Inter-laboratory Isotopic Variability Due to Sample Preparation

Bibliographic Data

ID7776166
AuthorsAmelia Edwards (corresponding author), Lesley Chesson, Lesley A Chesson (0000-0002-8457-9341, Joint Typhoon Warning Center), Eric J Bartelink (0000-0001-5050-4088), Eric Bartelink, Thuan Chau (0000-0003-0390-4921), Gregory Berg, G E Berg (0000-0003-4225-1783, Joint Typhoon Warning Center)
Year2022
Volume5
Issue1
Publication date2022-02-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueForensic Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2573-5020 • E-ISSN: 2573-5039
PublisherUniversity Press of Florida (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5744/fa.2020.0045
OpenAlexW4213424014
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Here we present a two-part study to assess isotope data comparability between two sample preparation laboratories, based on the concept of Real Interpretative Differences (RID). Inter-laboratory isotopic variability should be evaluated prior to compiling data from different sources. Isotopic variability can result from two main causes: sample preparation and sample analysis. We compared the carbon and nitrogen isotope delta (δ) values of 20 modern human bone collagen sample pairs—representing seven individuals from diverse backgrounds—thatwere prepared close in time at two laboratories and then analyzed at one facility. From this study, values for RID of preparation, or RIDprep, were calculated for bone collagen as 0.43‰ and 0.75‰ for δ13C values and δ15N values, respectively. These RIDprep values were tested using a set of 30 bone collagen sample pairs—representing 30 modern individuals—that were first prepared over a span of five years (2014–2019) at one laboratory; they were prepared again at the second laboratory in 2019. While the differences in isotope δ values between the paired samples in the second study were statistically significant, they did not exceed the calculated RIDprep values for either carbon (30 comparisons) or nitrogen (30 comparisons)—with the exception of one carbon difference in a single paired bone sample. The inherent error rate in combining the isotope test results was thus calculated as 1.7%. This study demonstrated that the isotope data generated from human bone collagen prepared at one laboratory can be reliably compared to data generated from samples prepared at the other laboratory

Analytical Chemistry (journal · Biology · Chromatography · Human bone · Isotope · Isotope analysis · Isotopes of carbon · Isotopes of nitrogen · Nuclear physics · Physics · Sample (material · Sample Preparation · Stable isotope ratio · Statistics · Chemistry · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Isotope Analysis in Ecology · Mathematics · Ecology

  • The influence of taphonomy on histological and isotopic analyses of treated and untreated buried modern human bone

    Open Access•Rebecca A G Reid, M M E Jans et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae