Welfare Regime Variation in the Impact of the Great Recession on Deprivation Levels
A Dynamic Perspective on Polarisation vs Convergence for Social Risk Groups, 2005–2014
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7893248 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dorothy Watson (0000-0001-7606-8886, Economic and Social Research Institute), Raffaele Grotti (0000-0002-8382-2290, University of Trento), Christopher T Whelan (0000-0002-3387-5036, University College Dublin), Bertrand Maître (0000-0003-2698-1524, Economic and Social Research Institute) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 813-833 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047279421000210 |
| OpenAlex | W3165036198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 37 |
This paper investigates changes over the period 2005 to 2014 in material deprivation dynamics of social risk groups in 11 European countries covering a range of welfare regimes. The period covered experienced dramatic economic change, encompassing periods of boom, the Great Recession and early recovery. Social risk groups are defined as groups which differ in the challenges that they face in converting resources into desired outcomes. The comparative element of the paper allows us to assess whether certain welfare regimes were better at protecting more vulnerable groups. Results, based on the longitudinal component of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions and on analysis of deprivation dynamics between pairs of years, showed large inequality between groups in the risk of persistent deprivation – with lone parents and people with disability most at risk in all countries. Variation across welfare regimes was restricted to the contrast between the liberal and the remaining regimes. Countries belonging to the former regime (UK and Ireland) were distinctive in showing the largest social risk gap in persistent deprivation and were the only ones which experienced substantial polarisation between groups with the Great Recession
Convergence (economics) · Demographic economics · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · European union · Great recession · Inequality · International economics · Labour economics · Macroeconomics · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Recession · Social exclusion · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare state · Demography · Employment and Welfare Studies · Health disparities and outcomes · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Risk Society
Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe
The Great Recession and the Distribution of Household Income
Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis
Modelling low income transitions
New Risks and Social Change
The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State
New Risks, New Welfare
Poverty and Deprivation in Europe
The Experience Of Unemployment
European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers
The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty
Slipping into and out of Poverty
Poverty Trajectories After Risky Life Course Events in Different European Welfare Regimes
Hall of Mirrors
The 'Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe
The social stratification of social risks
Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families
Modelling household income dynamics
The Interrelationships between the Europe 2020 Poverty and Social Exclusion Indicators
Consequences of growing up poor
Poverty Dynamics
The duration and timing of exposure
Polarization or “Squeezed Middle” in the Great Recession
Welfare Regimes and Poverty Dynamics
Risk society
A life-course perspective on social exclusion and poverty
The Idea of Justice
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Economic Insecurity and Social Stratification
Families in the Life Course
Regimes, Social Risks and the Welfare Mix
Scars that will not Disappear
Poverty Transitions and Trigger Events across EU Groups of Countries
Care as a Good for Social Policy
Direct and Indirect Measures of Poverty
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |