What and whom are family policies for? Unpacking the meaning of citizens’ support for family policy across Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID7991754
AuthorsTatjana Rakar (0000-0002-5357-8194, University of Ljubljana, corresponding author), Heejung Chung (0000-0002-6422-6119, University of Kent), Katharina Zimmermann (0000-0002-1074-3356, Universität Hamburg), Mi Ah Schøyen (0000-0003-4851-9920), Maša Filipovič Hrast (0000-0003-4816-1164, University of Ljubljana)
Year2022
Pages1-14
Publication date2022-01-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International and Comparative Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2169-9763 • E-ISSN: 2169-978X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/ics.2021.16
OpenAlexW3216332233
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

The paper provides a comparative investigation into public attitudes to family policies. It shows that citizens’ support for family policies is diverse across different welfare regimes with respect to four countries belonging to distinct regimes: the United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Slovenia. Using qualitative data, we unpack the ways individuals view the need for family policies, the rationale they use to explain their support for family policies and for imposing restrictions on access to family policies – ie. why, for whom and under which conditions. We find that social rights narratives are common in Norway; a social investment logic is prevalent in Germany and Slovenia; while in the United Kingdom, the dominant view is closer to the work-central individualised responsibility narrative of neoliberalism. In addition, we find differences across regimes in which family policies should target. In the United Kingdom and Germany, the focus is much more on providing support to activate parents, while in Norway and partly Slovenia, the focus is on providing well-being for children. The findings show that despite some convergence in family policies across Europe in recent times, we still find clear diversity in what and for whom family policies are for, its rationale largely embedded in the larger institutional normative structures of the welfare state. The results not only contribute to the literature on the relationship between public attitudes and welfare institutions, but also point towards shifting ideas about the role of family policies in the context of societal change

Context (archaeology · Diversity (politics · Economic growth · Economics · Family support · Geography · Narrative · Normative · Political science · Public policy · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare reform · Welfare state · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Social Policy and Reform Studies