Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An elephant in the room? Explaining agenda-setting in antimicrobial resistance policies in 30 European countries

Bibliographic Data

ID8018451
AuthorsColette S Vogeler (0000-0003-0197-4205, German University of Administrative Sciences, corresponding author), Anne-Marie Parth (0000-0002-8846-6141, German University of Administrative Sciences)
Year2024
Volume356
Pages117164-117164
Publication date2024-07-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117164
PMID39088927
OpenAlexW4401159003
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited37

Antimicrobial resistances (AMR) present a particularly challenging cross-sectoral policy problem, affecting human and animal health as well as the environment. Compared to the actual problem pressure, the public awareness for AMR is comparatively low and the issue has not been high on the political agenda in most. Given the rising problem pressure, we aim to find out as to what degree and under which conditions political parties bring AMR on the political agenda. By means of multilevel logit regressions based on 173 electoral manifestos in 30 European countries from 2015 to 2020, we explore the conditions that explain whether AMR are taken up in manifestos. The empirical findings indicate firstly that AMR are only addressed by political parties in Northern and Western Europe, in no case in Eastern, and only in one case in Southern Europe, though resistant bacteria are more widely spread in the latter. Secondly, Green parties are those who are most likely to address the AMR challenge. Thirdly, vote share is positively associated with AMR agenda-setting, while EU membership is insignificant and the national average on antibiotics consumption is negatively related to AMR agenda-setting. Finally, AMR are surprisingly mainly perceived as a problem of the agricultural policy subsystem despite its cross-sectoral policy character. The study makes theoretical and empirical contributions: regarding theory, the article shows that typical variables that are used for agenda-setting are less explanatory for complex intersectoral policies. This is also accompanied by the empirical contribution: since problem awareness and complexity of policy problems are correlated, AMR are reduced to an agricultural issue and as such, it is taken over by political parties that have expertise on agricultural-environmental topics

Development economics · Economics · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public health · Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Medicine · Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

  • Explaining Differentiated Policy Implementation of EU Animal Welfare Regulations

    Open Access•Ida Schrøder, Johanna Kuenzler et al.•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2026

  • Blame and responsibility attribution across actor dimensions

    Open Access•Tanja Puran, Josefine Wyser et al.•Policy Sciences•2026

  • Political rootlessness, rather than capacity and subsystem support loss? Probing why policy derived from internationally popular norms may terminate easily

    Open Access•Erik Baekkeskov, Oliver Rubin et al.•Policy and Society•2026

  • Explaining Varied Responses to Creeping Crises

    Open Access•Nicholas Olczak, Mark Rhinard•Journal of Contingencies and…•2026

  • Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions

    Open Access•Ramanan Laxminarayan, Adriano Dusé et al.•The Lancet Infectious Diseases•2013

  • The promises and pitfalls of polysemic ideas

    Open Access•Adam Hannah, Erik Baekkeskov•Policy Sciences•2020

  • The environment, left-wing political orientation and ecological economics

    Open Access•E Neumayer•Ecological Economics•2004

  • An umbrella review of intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy

    Open Access•Michelle Amri, Ali Chatur et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Sentience and salience – exploring the party politicization of animal welfare in multi-level electoral systems

    Open Access•Paul Chaney, Ian Rees Jones et al.•Regional & Federal Studies•2020

  • Policy integration

    J Tosun, Achim Lang•Policy Studies•2017

  • Toward a processual understanding of policy integration

    Open Access•Jeroen J L Candel, Robbert Biesbroek•Policy Sciences•2016

  • Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration

    Open Access•Robbert Biesbroek, Jeroen J L Candel•Policy Sciences•2019

  • Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership Over Issues

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Sharad Iyengar•Public Opinion Quarterly•1994

  • Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems

    Markus Wagner, Thomas M Meyer•West European Politics•2014

  • Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership

    Ian Budge•West European Politics•2015

  • Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention

    Open Access•Heinrich Kluver, Heike Klüver et al.•West European Politics•2016

  • Party support for post-exceptionalism in agri-food politics and policy

    J Tosun•Journal of European Public Policy•2017

  • Comparative studies of policy agendas

    F R Baumgartner, Christoffer Green-Pedersen et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2006

  • While We Are Waiting for the Superbug

    Open Access•C S Jensen•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2020

  • Why Do Farm Animal Welfare Regulations Vary Between EU Member States? A Comparative Analysis of Societal and Party Political Determinants in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK

    Open Access•Colette S Vogeler•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2019

  • Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda‐setting

    Open Access•Christoffer Green-Pedersen, Christoffer Green‐pedersen et al.•European Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Left-Right Semantics and the New Politics Cleavage

    Open Access•Herbert Kitschelt, Staf Helleman•Comparative Political Studies•1990

  • Newspapers and Political Awareness

    Jeffery J Mondak•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges

    Open Access•Rob Thomson, Robert Thomson et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention

    Open Access•Heinrich Kluver, Heike Klüver et al.•British Journal of Political…•2016

  • The Party Family and Its Study

    Peter Mair, Cas Mudde•Annual Review of Political Science•1998

  • Greening the mainstream

    Neil Carter•Environmental Politics•2013

  • Political Ideology, Political Party, and Support for Greater Federal Spending on Environmental Protection in the United States

    Open Access•Steven T Yen, Ernest M Zampelli•Review of Policy Research•2021

  • The state of social science research on antimicrobial resistance

    Open Access•Snorre Sylvester Frid-Nielsen, Oliver Rubin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • The manifestation of the green agenda

    Marc Debus, J Tosun•Environmental Politics•2021

  • The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis

    Open Access•Giliberto Capano, Michael Howlett•SAGE Open•2020

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae