Doing Ontology and Doing Justice
What Feminist Philosophy Can Teach Us About Meta-Metaphysics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8090450 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mari Mikkola (0000-0002-4319-7531, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 7-8 |
| Pages | 780-805 |
| Publication date | 2015-09-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2015.1083469 |
| OpenAlex | W2200359381 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 30 |
Feminist philosophy has recently become recognised as a self-standing philosophical sub-discipline. Still, metaphysics has remained largely dismissive of feminist insights. Here I make the case for the value of feminist insights in metaphysics: taking them seriously makes a difference to our ontological theory choice and feminist philosophy can provide helpful methodological tools to regiment ontological theories. My examination goes as follows. Contemporary ontology is not done via conceptual analysis, but via quasi-scientific means. This takes different ontological positions to be competing hypotheses about reality’s fundamental structure that are then assessed with a loose battery of criteria for theory choice. Such criteria make up the constitutive values of ontology (e.g. providing a unified, coherent, non-circular, simple, parsimonious total theory). These values are distinguished from contextual values of a practice: the political and moral values embedded in the social context of inquiry. Although we may be frank about some meta-metaphysical value commitments, bringing in feminist contextual values is viewed as an unacceptable move when thinking about ontological theory choice. This paper then asks: is this move unacceptable? I think not and I aim to motivate this methodological insight here by examining recent work on grounding
Economic Justice · Epistemology · Feminist philosophy · Metaphysics · Ontology · Political science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Law · Philosophy
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Metaphysics
Truth and Social Reality
The Metaphysics of Gender
The Aesthetic Constitution of Genders
Mind-Independence, Realism, and Reality
A Puzzle for Social Essences
Conceptual Engineering and Ways of Believing
Substantive metaphysical debates about gender and race
Grounding objectivity
Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge
Naturalized, Fundamental, and Feminist Metaphysics All at Once
Competition, contingency, and destabilization in urban assemblages and actor-networks
The Declaration of Interdependence! Feminism, Grounding and Enactivism
Ontology and Politics
What political theory can learn from conceptual engineering
Critical social ontology
Back by popular demand, ontology
Social kind essentialism
Social Construction and Grounding
Anchoring as Grounding
A Phenomenological Grounding of Feminist Ethics
What Social Construction Isn’t
Ethnoontology
Feminist Metaphysics and Philosophical Methodology
Varieties of ontological dependence
Ordinary Objects
Objects and Persons
Metaphysical Dependence
Grounding and Necessity
No Work for a Theory of Grounding
On What Grounds What
Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology
Metaphysical Grounding
A clarification and defense of the notion of grounding
Writing the Book of the World
Feminist Metaphysics
Essence and Modality
Acceptance‐dependence
In Search Of Feminist Epistemology
Regulative Rules and Constitutive Rules
Speech Acts
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,6 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |