China’s diplomatic strategies in response to economic disputes in Myanmar

Bibliographic Data

ID8096480
AuthorsDebby Sze Wan Chan (0000-0003-4529-2441, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume20
Issue2
Pages307-336
Publication date2018-09-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1470-482X • E-ISSN: 1470-4838
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/irap/lcy026
OpenAlexW2898954599
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited37

How do societal actors in the host country matter to Beijing’s diplomatic strategies? In the course of political transition in Myanmar, the Myitsone Dam was suspended in 2011, and the China–Myanmar High-Speed Railway was reportedly halted in 2014. Since then, Beijing is said to have adopted public diplomacy in response to these economic setbacks. However, this article finds variations in Beijing’s approaches; Beijing actively engaged with the dam challengers, but not the railway opponents, who offered less of a challenge. Moreover, Beijing tolerated the project’s suspension in the dam case, but ramped up pressure in the railway case by increasing Naypyitaw’s costs of defection. Beijing’s inconsistent diplomatic approaches are attributed to different levels of social opposition observed in the anti-Chinese project movements. As such, Beijing has the propensity to bypass societal actors and pressure Naypyitaw for project continuation if it perceives that social opposition is not a major obstacle in bilateral economic cooperation

Beijing · China · Development economics · Diplomacy · Economic Diplomacy · Economic growth · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Obstacle · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Peacebuilding and International Security · Law