Cartographic Rationality and the Politics of Geosurveillance and Security

Bibliographic Data

ID8096834
AuthorsJeremy W Crampton (0000-0001-5702-0430, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume30
Issue2
Pages135-148
Publication date2003-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCartography and Geographic Information Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1523-0406 • E-ISSN: 1545-0465
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1559/152304003100011108
OpenAlexW2131274551
LanguageEN
Citations received30
References cited6

This paper examines the prevalence of geosurveillance and cartographic rationality today by situating it in the age-old practice of governmental surveillance. I approach this question in a broadly Foucauldian historical framework. Foucault outlined a historical transition between a strictly disciplinary society that surveys and disciplines individuals and a "governmental" or biopolitical society that works at the level of a population and its distribution across territory. I argue that this governmental surveillance includes mapping and GIS, which, although they have taken different forms over time, have long been governmental technologies of control. I further argue that surveillance and security operate by establishing norms and statistical averages that allow assessments to be made about risk and threat. In order to illustrate the deployment of these cartographies of surveillance, and to examine their particular effects, I use a case study of crime mapping. I conclude that any assessment of mapping and GIS for surveillance and security uses must consider the genesis of cartographic rationality. Keywords: GEOSURVEILLANCESECURITYGISCRIME MAPPING

Biopower · Business · Cartography · Discipline · Geography · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Population · Rationality · Social science · Sociology · Software deployment · Computer Science · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Global Security and Public Health · Sex work and related issues · Law