Secularizing the Pain of Footbinding in China

Missionary and Medical Stagings of the Universal Body

Bibliographic Data

ID8200340
AuthorsAngela Zito (New York University, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume75
Issue1
Pages1-24
Publication date2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the American Academy of Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7189 • E-ISSN: 1477-4585
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jaarel/lfl062
PMID20681094
OpenAlexW2145818165
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited51

How did foreign Christian anti-footbinding activists treat the distinctive forms of human embodiment they encountered in China? What were their assumptions? How should we understand the transition from religious to secular imaginings of the body and its pains? Here I discuss late nineteenth and early twentieth century religion and medicalized hygiene through the voices of two English people who campaigned against and wrote extensively about footbinding. Not an easy story about God traded for Nature, but a far more uneasy and subliminal borrowing and cross-fertilization of tropes between the religious and the scientific. In both evangelical religion and biological science our protagonists created powerful narrative technologies for making cultural process disappear into nature, and thus to re-channel agency, making it available for new projects. Here we see the secular and the religious informing and reinforcing one another as moments in the creation of the modern.

Aesthetics · Agency (philosophy) · Art · China · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Philosophy