A Postsecular Politics? Inter-faith Relations as a Civic Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8204214 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luke Bretherton (0000-0002-4032-8188, Public and Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 346-377 |
| Publication date | 2011-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7189 • E-ISSN: 1477-4585 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jaarel/lfq084 |
| OpenAlex | W2006590772 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 10 |
Much of the academic literature on religious dialogue, and the policy being formulated regarding inter-faith relations, lacks any scope for genuinely political relationships or any account of how inter-faith relations are affected by the market and the state. Abstracting accounts of inter-faith relations from broader accounts of political economy masks how the state and the market are key factors in establishing the conditions and possibilities for such relations. This article avoids such abstraction and develops a constructive account of how to reconceptualize inter-faith relations as a civic rather than religious practice and common action between different faiths as directly political rather than as humanitarian service provision. Part of this account entails situating it within broader debates about secularization and whether the contemporary context can be described as "postsecular." The key question addressed in this article is how can a common life be negotiated between different faith traditions, with different and competing claims to truths, amid the pressures and structures brought to bear upon that common life by the state and the market on which all depend? This article describes some of the factors shaping the relationship between faith groups, state and market within the contemporary context, and then, after locating these issues within broader theoretical debates about secularization, makes some constructive proposals for how religious groups might engage in inter-faith relations within this context. It closes by identifing the civic practices of listening, a commitment to place, and the building and maintenance of institutions as central to the formation of a politics of the common good.
Constructive · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Faith · Political science · Politics · Religious organization · Secularization · Sociology · State (computer science) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development
Law and the Rule of God
Politics as a Vocation
Post-secular trends
Law and the Rule of God
Faith-based Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue
How Can We Help? The Role of the Local Church and Other Religious Organizations When the Games Come to Town
In the letter of mere reason
Zombie multiculturalism meets liberative difference
Modernity in the Theology of Karen Kilby
SSSR Presidential Address Public Religions and the Postsecular
(The Image Of) God in All of Us
The Politics of Migration, Church, and State
Can Theology Be Postsecular? Aesthetics and Non-Triumphalist Theology
Politics, Poverty and the Church in an 'Age of Austerity
Community Organizing in Britain
Charitable Choice
The Reconstruction of Religious Arenas in the Framework of `Multiple Modernities
Faith in Politics
Establishment, Multiculturalism and British Citizenship
Religio-Secular Metamorphoses
Religion, Resources, and Representation
E Pluribus Unum
Trends in Social Capital
Congregations and Civil Society
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |