Resisting Legibility
State and Conservation Boundaries, Pastoralism, and the Risk of Dispossession through Geospatial Surveys in Tanzania
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8239855 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jevgeniy Bluwstein (0000-0002-1162-5028, University of Fribourg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rural Landscapes Society Environment History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2002-0104 • E-ISSN: 2002-0104 |
| Publisher | Stockholm University Press (PUBLISHER • SE) |
| DOI | 10.16993/rl.53 |
| OpenAlex | W2958394165 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 43 |
This article illustrates how the introduction of modern geospatial surveying technology in Tanzania has failed to resolve a boundary conflict between the state and nature conservation authorities on one side and a rural community of pastoralists on the other. Far from fixing a contested geography by resurveying its boundaries and facilitating stakeholder participation for conflict resolution, digital cartography has made visible and reanimated the buried history of mismatched and conflicting logics between state-led territorial administration and conservation, and pastoral land use practices. The article shows how state and conservation officials have relied on the insights from fact-finding exercises to dismiss rural land use practices that are not represented in official maps. Pastoralists resist these state- and conservation-centred cartographic practices of fixed boundaries to maintain a historical, vital geography of seasonal access to pastures and water. By way of conclusion, this article highlights the pitfalls of geospatial land surveys and fact-finding exercises that unearth and lay bare a boundary conflict previously hidden from the state’s view. Through enhanced legibility, rural communities may become visible to the state, risking dispossession and evictions
Boundary (topology · Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Geospatial analysis · Legibility · Livestock · Pastoralism · Political science · Public relations · Remote sensing · Stakeholder · State (computer science · Tanzania · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Transboundary Water Resource Management
Informality, the Commons and the Paradoxes for Planning
Legal Empowerment of the Poor through Property Rights Reform
Paradoxes of participation
Scrambling for Land in Tanzania
Maps, Metaphors, and Meanings
Siam Mapped and Mapping in Cambodia
Governing Unclear Lines
Cartography
Territoriality by Conservation in the Selous–Niassa Corridor in Tanzania
Village land politics and the legacy of ujamaa
Land tenure regimes and state structure in rural Africa
Battles over boundaries
Trypanosomiasis Control in African History
Mapping for investability
Creating ecotourism territories
With Numbers in Place
Fixing” the Forest
Land Institutions and Political Ethnicity in Africa
Conservation and Displacement
A cartography of dispossession
Dilemmas of Counter-Mapping Community Resources in Tanzania
Caught between the Cartographic and the Ethnographic Imagination
Re-Mapping the Nation
The Grass Beneath
Development, demarcation and ecological outcomes in Maasailand
Subaltern Struggles and the Politics of Place
Mapping reeds and reading maps
Cartography, territory, property
Ambivalent cartographies
Mapping Indigenous Lands
Between dependence and deprivation
Performing Participation
Land use plans in Tanzania
Green appropriations through shifting contours of authority and property on a pastoralist commons
Looking back to see forward
Freedom and Unfreedom in Rural Development
Beyond Ground Truth
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |