Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Disclosing Non-Monogamy

Bibliographic Data

ID8358366
AuthorsJoel Anderson (0000-0003-3649-2003, La Trobe University, corresponding author), Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin (0009-0007-0233-1419, La Trobe University), Scarlet Rosa (0009-0007-1360-8727), Karen D Goldschlager (Australian Catholic University), Jordan D X Hinton (0000-0003-0922-5620, La Trobe University)
Year2025
Volume54
Issue4
Pages1481-1495
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchives of Sexual Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-0002 • E-ISSN: 1573-2800
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0
PMID40128496
OpenAlexW4408846002
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited34

Non-monogamy refers to a set of relationship identities and structures that go against societal norms and expectations of “typical” relationships (i.e., monogamous heteronormative dyadic relationships). As such, non-monogamous individuals often conceal this identity and then need to engage in continuous decision-making processes regarding when and how to disclose, due in part to the structural barriers, stigma, and discrimination faced by this population. This study sought to explore the experiences of the disclosure of consensual (or ethical) non-monogamy and the factors impacting on the decision to disclose across a range of environments. Data on lived experiences were explored by conducting qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 non-monogamous adults living in Australia. Based on grounded theory, four key themes were identified during the analysis of the data: (1) decisions around how and when to disclosure are complex, (2) responses to disclosure are typically negative, (3) structural barriers typically prevent disclosure, and (4) unless specifically trained, healthcare providers are typically uninformed about non-monogamy. These findings are discussed in relation to providing a base model of disclosure for future research to build upon and to enhance understanding of systemic and healthcare-related issues faced by this population. This research adds to the current understanding of factors impacting disclosure, with possible clinical implications and suggestions for future research discussed

Grounded theory · Health care · Identity (music) · Population · Qualitative research · Self-disclosure · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • How perceived mate value discrepancies are related to jealousy, mate guarding, intrasexual competition, and partner conflict in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships

    Open Access•Faith L Swanson, Rhonda Balzarini et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2026

  • Countering the ‘monogamy-superiority’ myth

    Open Access•Joel Anderson, Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin et al.•Health Education Journal•2026

  • Exploring How Bi + People Differently Experience Minority Stress Events According to the Gender of Their Partner/s

    Open Access•Joel Anderson•Journal of Bisexuality•2026

  • Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth

    Open Access•Joel Anderson, Jordan D X Hinton et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2026

  • A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships

    Open Access•Terri D Conley, Ali Ziegler et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2013

  • Perceived Stigmatization and Disclosure among Individuals in Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships

    Open Access•Adrian M Valadez, Jaqueline Rohde et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2020

  • Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships

    Open Access•Amy C Moors, Heath Schechinger et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Exploring Minority Stress and Resilience in a Polyamorous Sample

    Open Access•Ryan G Witherspoon, Peter S Theodore•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Defining Polyamory

    Open Access•D Cardoso, Patricia Monteiro Pascoal et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Assessing Implicit Associations with Consensual Non-monogamy Among U.S. Early Emerging Adults

    Open Access•Amy E Thompson, Elle A Moore et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2020

  • The protective role of identity integration against internalized sexual prejudice for religious gay men

    Joel Anderson, Emma Kiernan et al.•Psychology of Religion and…•2023

  • Counting polyamorists who count

    Open Access•Alicia N Rubel, Tyler J Burleigh et al.•Sexualities•2020

  • Polyamory and its ‘Others’

    Open Access•C Klesse•Sexualities•2006

  • Understanding Non-Monogamies

    D Riggs, Meg Barker et al.•Understanding Non-Monogamies•2010

  • The Fewer the Merrier

    Open Access•Terri D Conley, Amy C Moors et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2012

  • Perceptions of monogamy, nonconsensual nonmonogamy and consensual nonmonogamy at the intersections of race and gender

    Noelle M St Vil, Laina Y Bay-Cheng et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2022

  • Three’s a crowd

    Kevin T Hutzler, Traci A Giuliano et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2015

  • Wanting ‘the whole loaf’

    Tyler J Burleigh, Tyler Burleigh et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2016

  • Personality Correlates of Desire to Engage in Consensual Non-monogamy among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals

    Amy C Moors, Dylan Selterman et al.•Journal of Bisexuality•2017

  • Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth

    Open Access•Joel Anderson, Jordan D X Hinton et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2026

  • A Closer Look at Relationship Structures

    Open Access•Sharon M Flicker, Flavia Sancier‐barbosa et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Satisfaction with Open Sexual Agreements in Australian Gay Men’s Relationships

    Open Access•Warwick Hosking•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2013

  • Are there “Better” and “Worse” Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)

    Open Access•Terri D Conley, Jennifer L Piemonte•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Australian Gay Men’s Satisfaction with Sexual Agreements

    Open Access•Warwick Hosking•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2014

  • Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy

    Open Access•Lisa Dawn Hamilton, Carm De Santis et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2021

  • Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations

    Ilan H Meyer•Psychological Bulletin•2003

  • Intersectional Narrative Practice with Queer Muslim Clients

    Sekneh Hammoud-Beckett•Journal of Intercultural Studies•2022

  • Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Carla O’connor, H Joffe•International Journal of…•2020

  • Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews

    Open Access•Gary Shaffer, John L Campbell et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2013

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae