Railway interests and the ‘rope of air’, 1840–8

This paper examines the usefulness of the category ‘interest’ in the history of technology through a case study of the failed attempt to introduce atmospheric railway traction in Britain in the 1840s. It argues for a reflective deployment of the term in question, sensitive to contemporary usages. A schematic typology of railway ‘interests’ shows just how various these were. Financial interests, for example, were not the same as professional ones; or an investor might feel the pull of contrary interests, depending on whether she was checking her dividends or taking a train. The history of atmospheric traction demonstrates the interlocking of railway ‘interests’, and their utility in explaining the success or failure of railway technologies. As might be expected, determinism, whether technological or ‘social’, does not answer the case. ‘Interest’ relations are contingent, and so must be understood the failure of the atmospheric railway

Business · Dividend · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Public relations · Rope · Schematic · Sociology · Typology · Engineering · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Mechanical Engineering · Travel Writing and Literature

• Early marks

  Paul Duguid•Business History•2018

  Add to list