The problem of feedback in oral tradion
Four examples form the Fante coastlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8980716 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Henige (University of Birmingham, corresponding author), David P Henige |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 223-235 |
| Publication date | 1973-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of African History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8537 • E-ISSN: 1469-5138 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021853700012536 |
| OpenAlex | W2140047842 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 5 |
Little attention has been devoted to the uncritical and almost reflexive incorporation of available printed information into allegedly oral historical materials. This inclination is particularly strong when oral traditions attempt to cope with material more than a century old. The present paper discusses the mechanisms by which such ‘feedback’ materials were incorporated into the traditional accounts of four coastal Fante stools, and the ambiences which encouraged such processes. Stool, succession, and land disputes were concomitants of Fante political activity, and the imposition by the British of an indirect form of rule allowed Fante traditional historians ample scope for manipulating and creating traditions to fit every contingency. The high level of literacy among the Fante and the relatively large number of early printed works which touched upon the history of the area only served to encourage these propensities. For various reasons many of these barnacles failed to become entrenched, but others were accepted by the British at the time that they were advanced and have since become the accepted and orthodox versions of traditional accounts. While in degree the responses of the Fante were not representative of other African societies, in kind their responses were wholly typical of the development of oral historical materials almost everywhere. The historian must consider a given tradition as having been dynamic over time, and must concern himself not only with its content, but with the circumstances of its development as well
Aesthetics · Anglo saxon · Art · Contingency · Epistemology · Literacy · Political science · Politics · Reflexivity · Scope (computer science · Social science · Sociology · African history and culture analysis · African history and culture studies · Classics · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy
Colonización, resistencia y transformación de la memoria histórica fang en Guinea Ecuatorial (1900-1948)
Central Africa from Cameroun to the Zambezi
Rethinking D. Beatriz Kimpa Vita for Contemporary Times
The western Maghrib and Sudan
The East African interior
The East Coast, Madagascar and the Indian Ocean
Upper and Lower Guinea
Central Africa from Cameroun to the Zambezi
The eastern Maghrib and the central Sudan
From Atlantic Creoles to African Nationalists
Making History, Creating Gender
Making History, Creating Gender
The Cambridge History of Africa
Making History in Africa
Impossible to Disprove Yet Impossible to Believe
Central and Eastern Wangara
Watch the Waves of the Sea”
From Atlantic Creoles to African Nationalists
Forests of History
Traditional Myths and Historian's Myths
The Benin Kinglist/s
Doorway to Success?”
Examining Text Sediments–Commending a Pioneer Historian as an “African Herodotus”
Feedback As a “Problem” in Oral History
Fieldwork, Orality, Text
Melanesians in North Queensland
Truths yet Unborn? Oral Tradition as a Casualty of Culture Contact
Indirect Rule in the Gold Coast
Ọba Kòso
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 1974 - 2023 (50) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |