Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quality of Care Provided to Individual Patients in US Hospitals

Results From an Analysis of National Hospital Quality Alliance Data

Bibliographic Data

ID9099493
AuthorsChristine Vogeli (0000-0001-5535-0719, MGH Institute of Health Professions, corresponding author), Raymond Kang (0000-0001-7762-8152, Northwestern University), Mary Beth Landrum (0000-0001-5055-8473, Harvard University), Romana Hasnain-Wynia, Romana Hasnain‐Wynia (0000-0001-6009-3569, Northwestern University), Joel S Weissman (0000-0002-4990-6263)
Year2009
Volume47
Issue5
Pages591-599
Publication date2009-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819432cd
PMID19365292
OpenAlexW2026557441
LanguageEN
References cited19

Background: There is little national data on the characteristics of patients who receive high quality inpatient care defined as either the receipt of all appliable processes (all-or-none performance) or the proportion of applicable processes received during thier hospitalization. Objectives: To assess the quality of care provided to patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure or pneumonia, to describe variations in quality by patient and hospital characteristics, and the sensitivity of all-or-none performance to the number and type of processes. Design and Subjects: Retrospective analysis of previously unavailable Hospital Quality Alliance patient-level data on 2.3 million individuals receiving care in non-federal US hospitals in 2005. Measures: The proportion of patients who received all applicable care processes, and the mean proportion of applicable processes received by hospitalized patients. Results: 82.8% of AMI patients, 57.3% of HF patients, and 41.7% of PN patients received all applicable care processes during their hospitalizations. Within each condition, all-or-none performance varied by patient age, race/ethnicity, and admission source, and characteristics of the hospital in which they received care. In addition, patients who were eligible for more processes were less likely to receive all of them, and certain individual processes had large impacts on all-or-none performance. Conclusions: Large numbers of U.S. hospital patients fail to receive all recommended care. All-or-none composites are intriguing indicators of quality; however designers of such systems should address the sensitivity of these composites to both the number and type of individual processes included

Acute care · Health care · Heart failure · Hospital care · Inpatient care · Intensive care medicine · Medical emergency · MEDLINE · Myocardial infarction · Pneumonia · Receipt · Retrospective cohort study · Emergency Medicine · Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

  • Longitudinal Data Analysis for Discrete and Continuous Outcomes

    Scott L Zeger, Kung-Yee Liang et al.•Biometrics•1986

  • The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States

    ELIZABETH A MCGLYNN, Steven M Asch et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2003

  • Combining Multiple Indicators of Clinical Quality

    Dan Reeves, David Reeves et al.•Medical Care•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae