Associations Between Adherence to Guidelines for Antipsychotic Dose and Health Status, Side Effects, and Patient Care Experiences

Bibliographic Data

ID9102003
AuthorsBarbara Dickey (Cambridge Hospital, corresponding author), Sharon‐Lise T Normand (0000-0001-7027-4769, Harvard University), Sharon-Lise T Normand, Sue Eisen, Richard Hermann (0000-0003-1640-2971), Richard C Hermann (Tufts Medical Center), Paul D Cleary (0000-0001-7527-4354), Paul Cleary (0000-0001-9335-5422), Dharma E Cortés (0000-0002-2400-348X, Cambridge Hospital, corresponding author), Dharma Cortés, N C Ware (0000-0002-5039-9991), Norma Ware
Year2006
Volume44
Issue9
Pages827-834
Publication date2006-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000215806.11805.6c
PMID16932134
OpenAlexW2073220332
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

BACKGROUND: One approach to improving quality of care is to encourage physicians to follow evidence-based practice guidelines. Examples of evidence-based guidelines are the PORT recommendations for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, few studies have examined the relationship between adherence to guidelines and patient outcomes in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to report the relationship between guideline adherence to antipsychotic medication dose and self-reported health status, side effects, and perceptions of care. RESEARCH DESIGN: This report is based on a subsample of patients from a larger prospective observational study of disabled Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries treated for schizophrenia. SUBJECTS: Participants were 329 acutely ill, vulnerable, high-risk Medicaid adult beneficiaries enrolled after visiting any 1 of 8 psychiatric emergency screening teams for hospital admission evaluation. MEASURES: Dose levels, symptoms, and functioning from medical records; self-reports as data collected from BASIS-32, SF-12, and CABHS; and paid health benefit claims for psychiatric treatment were measured. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of the patients in this study had daily antipsychotic doses well above the recommended range, but there was no evidence that their health status was better than those on doses below 1000 CPZ units recommended for acute episodes. High-dose levels had no relationship to baseline symptom profile or referral source. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that health status was better on higher-than-recommended doses, but we cannot conclude that lower doses for some would have led to poorer outcomes. Physicians who believe that higher doses are more therapeutic for patients need to demand rigorous effectiveness research that tests whether there are benefits of higher doses and determine the ratio of those benefits to the clinical costs, including the risk of side effects

Antipsychotic · Emergency department · Family medicine · Guideline · Health care · Medicaid · Medical record · MEDLINE · Observational study · Psychiatry · Referral · Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Emergency Medicine · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Schizophrenia research and treatment