Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Economic Differences in Direct and Indirect Costs Between People With Epilepsy and Without Epilepsy

Bibliographic Data

ID9102311
AuthorsAnne M Libby (0000-0002-4564-9407, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, corresponding author), Vahram Ghushchyan (University of Montana, corresponding author), R Brett McQueen (0000-0002-4302-2678, University of Montana, corresponding author), Julia F Slejko (0000-0001-6900-9220, University of Montana, corresponding author), Jacqueline L Bainbridge (University of Colorado Denver), Jonathan D Campbell (0000-0001-6539-1258, University of Colorado Denver, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume50
Issue11
Pages928-933
Publication date2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0b013e31826c8613
PMID23047781
OpenAlexW1963832760
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

OBJECTIVE: To provide generalizable estimates of economic burden in epilepsy and nonepilepsy populations and a comprehensive accounting for employment-based lost productivity associated with epilepsy in current US health care systems as compared with other chronic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use the nationally representative data source (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey) from 1998 to 2009 to create a retrospective cohort of people diagnosed with epilepsy by a health professional and a comparison cohort of people with no epilepsy. MEASURES: Health care utilization and direct costs for all components of treatment, including prescription medications, wages, employment, educational attainment, family income, and lost productivity were outcomes. RESULTS: We observed economic disparities associated with epilepsy in the United States despite high rates of modern treatments (89% on anticonvulsant therapies). Only 42% of the people with epilepsy over age 18 reported employment compared with 70% of people with no epilepsy; among those, people with epilepsy reported missing an average of 12 days of work because of illness or injury as compared with 4 days in the nonepilepsy cohort. Holding other variables constant, people with epilepsy had a loss of productivity of $9504 in 2011 dollars compared with people with no epilepsy. In comparison, diabetes was associated with annual average lost productivity valued at $3358 and depression at $3182. CONCLUSIONS: Lost wage-based productivity associated with epilepsy was nearly equal to combined wage losses associated with diabetes, depression, anxiety, and asthma together. To evaluate societal burden of illness, results illustrate the importance of indirect costs in addition to treated prevalence and direct medical costs

Anxiety · Business · Cohort · Cohort study · Depression (economics) · Economics · Epilepsy · Health care · Indirect costs · Medical Expenditure Panel Survey · Medical prescription · Productivity · Psychiatry · Diet and metabolism studies · Epilepsy research and treatment · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

  • Post-Hurricane Distress Scale (PHDS)

    Open Access•Yonatan Carl, Andy Vega et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The social costs of child abuse in Japan

    Open Access•Ichiro Wada, Ataru Igarashi•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2014 - 2022 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae