Replies to Lombrozo, Piccinini, and Poirier and Beaulac
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9688399 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edouard Machery (0000-0002-9944-6138, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 195-212 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217311000199 |
| OpenAlex | W2054033258 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Content (measure theory) · Internet privacy · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Towards New Ways of Terminology Description
Concepts
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
Lot 2
In two minds
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
What memory is for
Retrieval time from semantic memory
Sources of Mathematical Thinking
Family resemblances
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
A Study of Concepts
How to Split Concepts
Concepts Are Not a Natural Kind
Splitting Concepts
Concepts
Emotion knowledge
How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996)
Years of Psychology of Concepts
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |