The intricate implementation of performance measurement systems

Exploring developments in professional-service organizations in the Dutch non-profit sector

Bibliographic Data

ID9962005
AuthorsChristine Teelken (0000-0002-7211-5574, Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Social Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume74
Issue4
Pages615-635
Publication date2008-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0020852308098471
OpenAlexW2140263854
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited42

Institutional and organizational theory supports the argument that current features of performance measurement systems (PMS) in public organizations are generally unsuitable for the actual nature of these professional organizations. Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in the health care and higher education sectors in the Netherlands have shown that, despite external pressures, the implementation of such systems is slower than intended and seems to occur outside the primary process of the organization. Two rounds of interviews with quality coordinators in 2003 and 2006 showed that the gap between performance measurement systems and the operational process continued to exist, although its nature had changed. In general, quality coordinators responded pragmatically to the changes imposed upon them, as peer review and collegial trust played a vital part. The empirical findings illustrate that institutional and professional theories supplement each other in a fruitful way. Points for practitioners Policy-makers in the public sector involved with quality care and assurance should be aware that a well-structured performance measurement system (PMS) is no guarantee of smooth implementation. On the contrary, the implementation deserves attention in its own right. The more sophisticated and demanding the design of PMS, the more likely it is that employees find ways to work round such a system and only use it in a superficial or compliant manner. If implementation is not taken seriously into account, this will only lead to a greater gap between reality and rhetoric

Argument (complex analysis · Business · Economics · Performance measurement · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Public sector · Quality (philosophy · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Marketing · Medicine · Public Policy and Administration Research