Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

R Hackforth

Datos Biográficos

ID1084102
NOMBRER Hackforth
NOMBRESR
APELLIDOHackforth
FIRMAHACKFORTH R
AFILIACIONESHill College
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS26
TOTAL DE CITAS17
TOTAL COMO AUTOR24
TOTAL COMO EDITOR2
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1913
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN1972
ÍNDICE H2
  • Plato's Phaedo

    Plato Plato, R Hackforth•BOOK•Plato's 'Phaedo'•1972

    The book is written for anyone seriously interested in Plato's thought and in the history of literary theory or of rhetoric. No knowledge of Greek is required. The focus of this account is on how the resources both of persuasive myth and of formal argument, for all that Plato sets them in strong contrast, nevertheless complement and reinforce each other in his philosophy

  • Plato

    Open Access•Plato Plato, R Hackforth•BOOK•Laws•1972

    The dialogue begins with a playful discussion of erotic passion, then extends the theme to consider the nature of inspiration, love and knowledge. The centerpiece is the myth of the charioteer - the famous and moving account of the vision, fall and incarnation of the soul. Professor Hackforth here translates the dialogue for the student and general reader. There is a running commentary on the course of the argument and the meaning of the key Gree…

  • Plato's Phaedo

    J L Ackrill, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • Plato's Phaedo

    Thomas G Rosenmeyer, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The American Journal of Philology•1957

  • Notes On Plato's Theaetetus

    R Hackforth•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•1957•Citada por: 2

  • Platonic Forms in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1957•Citada por: 1

    The complete, or almost complete, absence from the Theaetetus of any unequivocal reference to Platonic Forms is a problem, the solution of which appeared to many scholars to have been found and convincingly presented in the late Professor Gornford's book Plato's Theory of Knowledge , published in 1935. Put briefly, his contention was that the main purpose of the dialogue is to show that no acceptable definition of knowledge can be reached if the …

  • PLATO'S Phaedrus

    A C Lloyd, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1954

    Book Reviews Get access PLATO’S Phaedrus. Translated with Introduction and Commentary by R. Hackforth:. (Cambridge: University Press. 1952. Pp. vii + 172. Price 18s). A. C. Lloyd A. C. Lloyd Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 4, Issue 17, October 1954, Pages 374–375, https://doi.org/10.2307/2217377 Published: 01 October 1954

  • Plato's Phaedrus. Translated with Introduction and Commentary

    William C Greene, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Weekly•1953

  • Plato's Phaedrus

    John Robinson, John Mansley Robinson et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1953

  • Plato's Phaedrus

    J A Philip, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•Phoenix•1953

    The dialogue begins with a playful discussion of erotic passion, then extends the theme to consider the nature of inspiration, love and knowledge. The centerpiece is the myth of the charioteer - the famous and moving account of the vision, fall and incarnation of the soul. Professor Hackforth here translates the dialogue for the student and general reader. There is a running commentary on the course of the argument and the meaning of the key Gree…

  • Plato's Phaedrus.

    Fulton H Anderson, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy•1952

  • Immortality In Plato's Symposium

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Review•1950

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

  • Plato's Examination of Pleasure

    L A Post, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The American Journal of Philology•1946

  • Notes on Some Passages of Alexander Aphrodisiensis De Fato

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Moral Evil and Ignorance in Plato's Ethics

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    It is universally agreed that Plato inherited from Socrates, and consistently maintained to the end, the doctrine that no man does evil of set purpose—οὐδε⋯ς ⋯κὼν ⋯μαρτ⋯νει—but because he mistakes evil for good. All moral evil, therefore, for Plato, involves ignorance. There are, however, two passages, one in the Sophist , the other in Laws ix, which on the face of them appear to recognize a type of moral evil in which ignorance is not involved, …

  • Plato's Examination of Pleasure, a Translation of the Philebus, with Introduction and Commentary

    Glenn R Morrow, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Weekly•1945

  • False Statement in Plato's Sophist

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1945•Citada por: 1

    Plato's examination of False Statement ( Sophist 259 D–263 D) is, like many of his discussions in the later dialogues, a mixture of complete lucidity with extreme obscurity. Any English student who seeks to understand it will of course turn first to Professor Cornford's translation and commentary; and if he next reads what M. Diès has to say in the Introduction to his Budé edition of the Sophist he will, I think, have sufficient acquaintance with…

  • Notes on Some Passages of Plato'S Timaeus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1944

    T his famous sentence, which opens the address of the Demiurge to the created gods, has puzzled commentators both ancient and modern. We must, I think, agree with Taylor and Cornford, who both discuss it at length, that no sense can be got out of θεọἰ θε⋯ν taken together, i.e. with a comma after θε⋯ν: I need notreproduce their arguments on this point. Accordingly they punctuate after θεọἰ. Taylor, however, thinks that even so the sentence cannot …

  • Plato's Divided Line and Dialectic

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1942•Referencias: 1

    The old question whether or no the doctrine of ‘intermediate mathematical objects’ ascribed to Plato by Aristotle ( Met . 987 b 14, 1059 b 6) is to be found in the Divided Line of Republic vi, has been recently raised again in a careful and lucid discussion by Mr. W. F. R. Hardie. I may clear the ground by saying at once that I agree with that part of Mr. Hardie's chapter which deals with those criticisms of the traditional view that have been pu…

  • On Some Passages of Plato's Philebus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1939•Citada por: 1

    17A. οἱ δ νν τν νθρώπων σοφο ἓν μν, ὅπως ἂν τχωσι, κα πολλ θττον κα βραδὐτερον ποιοσι το δοντος, μετ δ τ ἓν ἄπειρα εὐθς τ δ μσα ατος κφεὺγειοἷς διακεχώρισται τ τε διαλεκτικς πλιν κα τ ριστικς μς ποιεῖσθαι πρς λλλους τος λγους

  • The Aviary Theory in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1938•Citada por: 1

    At 195B 9 it is pointed out that the Wax Block theory does not cover that large class of judgments in which no sense-objects are concerned, e.g. judgments about numbers. How can we make the mistake of judging that 7 + 5 = 11? The simile of the Aviary, now introduced, is very simple. It illustrates the difference between potential (or latent) knowledge and actual knowledge, i.e. between knowledge at our disposal, because it has been learnt and sto…

  • Plato's Theism

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1936•Citada por: 2

    I n the ontology of the Philebus (23C–30E) νο⋯σ is the αἰτία τ⋯ς συμμ⋯ξεωσ, the cause (called also τ⋯ δημιουργο⋯ν and τ⋯ ποιο⋯ν) that combines π⋯ρας with ἃπειρον into the mixture called γ⋯νεσισ εἰς οὐσ⋯αν or γεγενημ⋯νη οὐσ⋯α: correspondingly in the Timaeus the Demiurge, ⋯ ἃριστος τ⋯ν αἰτι⋯ν (29A), brings order into unordered chaos by ‘Forms and Numbers’ (διεσχηματ⋯σατο εἴδεσι κα⋯ ⋯ριθμοῖς 53B). In the Philebus the Universe has a Soul, discriminat…

  • Hedonism in Plato's Protagoras

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1928•Citada por: 6

    Perhaps the most important contribution to the history of Greek philosophy that has been made during the last twenty years is to be found in the work under-taken by Professors Burnet and A. E. Taylor in reconstructing the personality of the historical Socrates. There is, by this time, fairly general agreement that it is not to Xenophon's Memorabilia but to Plato's dialogues that we must go if we are to attempt to understand what Socrates meant fo…

  • The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles.

    W A Heidel, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy…•1914

  • The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles

    A E Taylor, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1914

Siguiente
  • Hedonism in Plato's Protagoras

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1928•Citada por: 6

    Perhaps the most important contribution to the history of Greek philosophy that has been made during the last twenty years is to be found in the work under-taken by Professors Burnet and A. E. Taylor in reconstructing the personality of the historical Socrates. There is, by this time, fairly general agreement that it is not to Xenophon's Memorabilia but to Plato's dialogues that we must go if we are to attempt to understand what Socrates meant fo…

  • Notes On Plato's Theaetetus

    R Hackforth•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•1957•Citada por: 2

  • Plato's Theism

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1936•Citada por: 2

    I n the ontology of the Philebus (23C–30E) νο⋯σ is the αἰτία τ⋯ς συμμ⋯ξεωσ, the cause (called also τ⋯ δημιουργο⋯ν and τ⋯ ποιο⋯ν) that combines π⋯ρας with ἃπειρον into the mixture called γ⋯νεσισ εἰς οὐσ⋯αν or γεγενημ⋯νη οὐσ⋯α: correspondingly in the Timaeus the Demiurge, ⋯ ἃριστος τ⋯ν αἰτι⋯ν (29A), brings order into unordered chaos by ‘Forms and Numbers’ (διεσχηματ⋯σατο εἴδεσι κα⋯ ⋯ριθμοῖς 53B). In the Philebus the Universe has a Soul, discriminat…

  • Platonic Forms in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1957•Citada por: 1

    The complete, or almost complete, absence from the Theaetetus of any unequivocal reference to Platonic Forms is a problem, the solution of which appeared to many scholars to have been found and convincingly presented in the late Professor Gornford's book Plato's Theory of Knowledge , published in 1935. Put briefly, his contention was that the main purpose of the dialogue is to show that no acceptable definition of knowledge can be reached if the …

  • Notes on Some Passages of Alexander Aphrodisiensis De Fato

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Moral Evil and Ignorance in Plato's Ethics

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    It is universally agreed that Plato inherited from Socrates, and consistently maintained to the end, the doctrine that no man does evil of set purpose—οὐδε⋯ς ⋯κὼν ⋯μαρτ⋯νει—but because he mistakes evil for good. All moral evil, therefore, for Plato, involves ignorance. There are, however, two passages, one in the Sophist , the other in Laws ix, which on the face of them appear to recognize a type of moral evil in which ignorance is not involved, …

  • False Statement in Plato's Sophist

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1945•Citada por: 1

    Plato's examination of False Statement ( Sophist 259 D–263 D) is, like many of his discussions in the later dialogues, a mixture of complete lucidity with extreme obscurity. Any English student who seeks to understand it will of course turn first to Professor Cornford's translation and commentary; and if he next reads what M. Diès has to say in the Introduction to his Budé edition of the Sophist he will, I think, have sufficient acquaintance with…

  • On Some Passages of Plato's Philebus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1939•Citada por: 1

    17A. οἱ δ νν τν νθρώπων σοφο ἓν μν, ὅπως ἂν τχωσι, κα πολλ θττον κα βραδὐτερον ποιοσι το δοντος, μετ δ τ ἓν ἄπειρα εὐθς τ δ μσα ατος κφεὺγειοἷς διακεχώρισται τ τε διαλεκτικς πλιν κα τ ριστικς μς ποιεῖσθαι πρς λλλους τος λγους

  • The Aviary Theory in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1938•Citada por: 1

    At 195B 9 it is pointed out that the Wax Block theory does not cover that large class of judgments in which no sense-objects are concerned, e.g. judgments about numbers. How can we make the mistake of judging that 7 + 5 = 11? The simile of the Aviary, now introduced, is very simple. It illustrates the difference between potential (or latent) knowledge and actual knowledge, i.e. between knowledge at our disposal, because it has been learnt and sto…

  • The Modification of Plan in Plato's Republic

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1913•Citada por: 1

    In a recent number of the Classical Quarterly Mr. F. M. Cornford argues against the commonly accepted view, according to which the tripartite social structure of the Republic is a corollary, in Plato′s mind, to the tripartition of the individual Soul. In the present paper I propose to examine the general plan of the dialogue, in the hope of showing that Plato′s conceptions of State and Soul were not, as generally assumed and as assumed by Mr. Cor…

  • The Modification of Plan in Plato's Republic

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1913•Citada por: 1

    In a recent number of the Classical Quarterly Mr. F. M. Cornford argues against the commonly accepted view, according to which the tripartite social structure of the Republic is a corollary, in Plato′s mind, to the tripartition of the individual Soul. In the present paper I propose to examine the general plan of the dialogue, in the hope of showing that Plato′s conceptions of State and Soul were not, as generally assumed and as assumed by Mr. Cor…

  • The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles.

    W A Heidel, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy…•1914

  • The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles

    A E Taylor, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1914

  • Hedonism in Plato's Protagoras

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1928•Citada por: 6

    Perhaps the most important contribution to the history of Greek philosophy that has been made during the last twenty years is to be found in the work under-taken by Professors Burnet and A. E. Taylor in reconstructing the personality of the historical Socrates. There is, by this time, fairly general agreement that it is not to Xenophon's Memorabilia but to Plato's dialogues that we must go if we are to attempt to understand what Socrates meant fo…

  • Plato's Theism

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1936•Citada por: 2

    I n the ontology of the Philebus (23C–30E) νο⋯σ is the αἰτία τ⋯ς συμμ⋯ξεωσ, the cause (called also τ⋯ δημιουργο⋯ν and τ⋯ ποιο⋯ν) that combines π⋯ρας with ἃπειρον into the mixture called γ⋯νεσισ εἰς οὐσ⋯αν or γεγενημ⋯νη οὐσ⋯α: correspondingly in the Timaeus the Demiurge, ⋯ ἃριστος τ⋯ν αἰτι⋯ν (29A), brings order into unordered chaos by ‘Forms and Numbers’ (διεσχηματ⋯σατο εἴδεσι κα⋯ ⋯ριθμοῖς 53B). In the Philebus the Universe has a Soul, discriminat…

  • The Aviary Theory in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1938•Citada por: 1

    At 195B 9 it is pointed out that the Wax Block theory does not cover that large class of judgments in which no sense-objects are concerned, e.g. judgments about numbers. How can we make the mistake of judging that 7 + 5 = 11? The simile of the Aviary, now introduced, is very simple. It illustrates the difference between potential (or latent) knowledge and actual knowledge, i.e. between knowledge at our disposal, because it has been learnt and sto…

  • On Some Passages of Plato's Philebus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1939•Citada por: 1

    17A. οἱ δ νν τν νθρώπων σοφο ἓν μν, ὅπως ἂν τχωσι, κα πολλ θττον κα βραδὐτερον ποιοσι το δοντος, μετ δ τ ἓν ἄπειρα εὐθς τ δ μσα ατος κφεὺγειοἷς διακεχώρισται τ τε διαλεκτικς πλιν κα τ ριστικς μς ποιεῖσθαι πρς λλλους τος λγους

  • Plato's Divided Line and Dialectic

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1942•Referencias: 1

    The old question whether or no the doctrine of ‘intermediate mathematical objects’ ascribed to Plato by Aristotle ( Met . 987 b 14, 1059 b 6) is to be found in the Divided Line of Republic vi, has been recently raised again in a careful and lucid discussion by Mr. W. F. R. Hardie. I may clear the ground by saying at once that I agree with that part of Mr. Hardie's chapter which deals with those criticisms of the traditional view that have been pu…

  • Notes on Some Passages of Plato'S Timaeus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1944

    T his famous sentence, which opens the address of the Demiurge to the created gods, has puzzled commentators both ancient and modern. We must, I think, agree with Taylor and Cornford, who both discuss it at length, that no sense can be got out of θεọἰ θε⋯ν taken together, i.e. with a comma after θε⋯ν: I need notreproduce their arguments on this point. Accordingly they punctuate after θεọἰ. Taylor, however, thinks that even so the sentence cannot …

  • Plato's Examination of Pleasure, a Translation of the Philebus, with Introduction and Commentary

    Glenn R Morrow, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Weekly•1945

  • False Statement in Plato's Sophist

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1945•Citada por: 1

    Plato's examination of False Statement ( Sophist 259 D–263 D) is, like many of his discussions in the later dialogues, a mixture of complete lucidity with extreme obscurity. Any English student who seeks to understand it will of course turn first to Professor Cornford's translation and commentary; and if he next reads what M. Diès has to say in the Introduction to his Budé edition of the Sophist he will, I think, have sufficient acquaintance with…

  • Plato's Examination of Pleasure

    L A Post, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The American Journal of Philology•1946

  • Notes on Some Passages of Alexander Aphrodisiensis De Fato

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Moral Evil and Ignorance in Plato's Ethics

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1946•Citada por: 1

    It is universally agreed that Plato inherited from Socrates, and consistently maintained to the end, the doctrine that no man does evil of set purpose—οὐδε⋯ς ⋯κὼν ⋯μαρτ⋯νει—but because he mistakes evil for good. All moral evil, therefore, for Plato, involves ignorance. There are, however, two passages, one in the Sophist , the other in Laws ix, which on the face of them appear to recognize a type of moral evil in which ignorance is not involved, …

  • Immortality In Plato's Symposium

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Review•1950

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

  • Plato's Phaedrus.

    Fulton H Anderson, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy•1952

  • Plato's Phaedrus. Translated with Introduction and Commentary

    William C Greene, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Weekly•1953

  • Plato's Phaedrus

    John Robinson, John Mansley Robinson et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1953

  • Plato's Phaedrus

    J A Philip, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•Phoenix•1953

    The dialogue begins with a playful discussion of erotic passion, then extends the theme to consider the nature of inspiration, love and knowledge. The centerpiece is the myth of the charioteer - the famous and moving account of the vision, fall and incarnation of the soul. Professor Hackforth here translates the dialogue for the student and general reader. There is a running commentary on the course of the argument and the meaning of the key Gree…

  • PLATO'S Phaedrus

    A C Lloyd, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1954

    Book Reviews Get access PLATO’S Phaedrus. Translated with Introduction and Commentary by R. Hackforth:. (Cambridge: University Press. 1952. Pp. vii + 172. Price 18s). A. C. Lloyd A. C. Lloyd Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 4, Issue 17, October 1954, Pages 374–375, https://doi.org/10.2307/2217377 Published: 01 October 1954

  • Plato's Phaedo

    Thomas G Rosenmeyer, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The American Journal of Philology•1957

  • Notes On Plato's Theaetetus

    R Hackforth•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•1957•Citada por: 2

  • Platonic Forms in the Theaetetus

    Open Access•R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•1957•Citada por: 1

    The complete, or almost complete, absence from the Theaetetus of any unequivocal reference to Platonic Forms is a problem, the solution of which appeared to many scholars to have been found and convincingly presented in the late Professor Gornford's book Plato's Theory of Knowledge , published in 1935. Put briefly, his contention was that the main purpose of the dialogue is to show that no acceptable definition of knowledge can be reached if the …

  • Plato's Phaedo

    J L Ackrill, R Hackforth•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • Plato's Phaedo

    Plato Plato, R Hackforth•BOOK•Plato's 'Phaedo'•1972

    The book is written for anyone seriously interested in Plato's thought and in the history of literary theory or of rhetoric. No knowledge of Greek is required. The focus of this account is on how the resources both of persuasive myth and of formal argument, for all that Plato sets them in strong contrast, nevertheless complement and reinforce each other in his philosophy

Philosophy (26 obras) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (25 obras) · Epistemology (17 obras) · Art (13 obras) · Literature (13 obras) · Philosophy (12 obras) · Computer Science (8 obras) · Classical Antiquity Studies (7 obras) · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 obras) · Contemporary philosophy (4 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae