Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

John O Nelson

Datos Biográficos

ID1094544
NOMBREJohn O Nelson
NOMBRESJohn
APELLIDOO Nelson
FIRMANELSON J O
AFILIACIONESUniversity of Colorado System
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS14
TOTAL DE CITAS4
TOTAL COMO AUTOR14
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1952
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN1978
ÍNDICE H1
  • Is freedom only an extrinsic good

    Open Access•John O Nelson, JohnO Nelson•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1978

  • Has the Authorship of An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature Really Been Decided

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1976

    Journal Article Has the Authorship of An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature Really Been Decided? Get access John O. Nelson John O. Nelson University of Colorado Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 26, Issue 102, January 1976, Pages 82–101, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218807 Published: 01 January 1976

  • Two Main Questions Concerning Hume's Treatise and Enquiry

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1972

  • How Is Non-Metaphysics Possible

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1969•Citada por: 1

  • Tastes

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1966

  • On Sommers' Reinstatement of Russell's Ontological Program

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1964•Citada por: 2

    It is essential to Sommers' formalist program to provide method for discriminating types or categories (in the philosophically important sense of these terms) that is both absolutely general in application and yet satisfies our ordinary intuitive discriminations of types (see p. 339). He purports to do so. He first constructs the definition of what he terms B-type. This is defined as follows: a of predicates constitutes B-type for an t if and onl…

  • The Conclusion of Book One, Part Four, of Hume's Treatise

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1964

  • In Defence of Descartes

    Open Access•John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1964•Citada por: 1

    My final aim in this paper is to show that Descartes is not guilty, as is so often maintained, of circular argumentation in the Meditations. But first it is important to uncover and remove certain tenacious misconceptions and confusions concerning what goes on in the Meditations which lend credence to the charge of circular argumentation. In this connection Mr. Harry Frankfurt's recent article, "Memory and the Cartesian Circle," is peculiarly ins…

  • Remembering

    John O Nelson, W Von Leyden•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1963

  • The Validation of Memory and Our Conception of a Past

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1963

  • The Confirmation of Hypotheses

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • Conceptual Thinking

    John O Nelson, Stephan Körner•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • In Defense of the Traditional Interpretation of the Square

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1954

  • A Study in Memory

    John O Nelson, E J Furlong•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1952

  • On Sommers' Reinstatement of Russell's Ontological Program

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1964•Citada por: 2

    It is essential to Sommers' formalist program to provide method for discriminating types or categories (in the philosophically important sense of these terms) that is both absolutely general in application and yet satisfies our ordinary intuitive discriminations of types (see p. 339). He purports to do so. He first constructs the definition of what he terms B-type. This is defined as follows: a of predicates constitutes B-type for an t if and onl…

  • How Is Non-Metaphysics Possible

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1969•Citada por: 1

  • In Defence of Descartes

    Open Access•John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1964•Citada por: 1

    My final aim in this paper is to show that Descartes is not guilty, as is so often maintained, of circular argumentation in the Meditations. But first it is important to uncover and remove certain tenacious misconceptions and confusions concerning what goes on in the Meditations which lend credence to the charge of circular argumentation. In this connection Mr. Harry Frankfurt's recent article, "Memory and the Cartesian Circle," is peculiarly ins…

  • A Study in Memory

    John O Nelson, E J Furlong•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1952

  • In Defense of the Traditional Interpretation of the Square

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1954

  • Conceptual Thinking

    John O Nelson, Stephan Körner•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • The Confirmation of Hypotheses

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1958

  • Remembering

    John O Nelson, W Von Leyden•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1963

  • The Validation of Memory and Our Conception of a Past

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1963

  • On Sommers' Reinstatement of Russell's Ontological Program

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1964•Citada por: 2

    It is essential to Sommers' formalist program to provide method for discriminating types or categories (in the philosophically important sense of these terms) that is both absolutely general in application and yet satisfies our ordinary intuitive discriminations of types (see p. 339). He purports to do so. He first constructs the definition of what he terms B-type. This is defined as follows: a of predicates constitutes B-type for an t if and onl…

  • The Conclusion of Book One, Part Four, of Hume's Treatise

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1964

  • In Defence of Descartes

    Open Access•John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1964•Citada por: 1

    My final aim in this paper is to show that Descartes is not guilty, as is so often maintained, of circular argumentation in the Meditations. But first it is important to uncover and remove certain tenacious misconceptions and confusions concerning what goes on in the Meditations which lend credence to the charge of circular argumentation. In this connection Mr. Harry Frankfurt's recent article, "Memory and the Cartesian Circle," is peculiarly ins…

  • Tastes

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1966

  • How Is Non-Metaphysics Possible

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1969•Citada por: 1

  • Two Main Questions Concerning Hume's Treatise and Enquiry

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1972

  • Has the Authorship of An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature Really Been Decided

    John O Nelson•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1976

    Journal Article Has the Authorship of An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature Really Been Decided? Get access John O. Nelson John O. Nelson University of Colorado Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 26, Issue 102, January 1976, Pages 82–101, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218807 Published: 01 January 1976

  • Is freedom only an extrinsic good

    Open Access•John O Nelson, JohnO Nelson•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1978

Philosophy (13 obras) · Epistemology (12 obras) · Contemporary philosophy (7 obras) · Psychology (5 obras) · Analytic philosophy (4 obras) · General interest (4 obras) · Philosophy (3 obras) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 obras) · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae