John Broome
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 138718 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | John Broome |
| NOMBRES | John |
| APELLIDO | Broome |
| FIRMA | BROOME J |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Oxford |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9421-889X |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 68 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 255 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 67 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 1 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1978 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 8 |
The Continuum Fallacy in Moral Philosophy
‘Spectrum arguments’ or ‘continuum arguments’ in moral philosophy are sometimes invalid because they commit a particular fallacy I call the ‘Continuum Fallacy’. An important example is an argument in population ethics described by Derek Parfit, which purports to derive a conclusion that he and others find repugnant on the basis of a weak and plausible premise. Parfit treats this as a paradox, and takes up the challenge of resolving it, looking fo…
The Value of Life in the Social Cost of Carbon
In its 2023 revision of the social cost of carbon, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency values people’s lives on the basis of their willingness to pay for them, without applying any distributional weights. It justifies this proposal on grounds of the Kaldor–Hicks criterion, which avoids interpersonal comparisons of wellbeing. But this criterion was discredited 70 years ago. Interpersonal comparisons of wellbeing cannot truly be avoided, and t…
Why Not a Carbon Tax
If the world is to overcome the threat of climate change, a price must be set on carbon. A carbon tax is a means of creating a carbon price, and it is an ideal tax in that, unlike most taxes, it promotes economic efficiency. Yet many countries have no carbon tax. The reason is that there are strong political interests opposed to taxing carbon. I shall argue that these interests need to be appeased by fully compensating anyone who would otherwise …
Climate Change and Population Ethics
Climate change will certainly alter the world’s future people. Moreover, the alteration may be very large. There is even a slight possibility that it will cause the extinction of humanity, so that after some future date there will be no more people ever. A correct assessment of the harm done by climate change or of the benefit of policies aimed at controlling climate change must take account of the resulting change of population. Yet in the pract…
Loosening the Betterness Ordering of Lives
The betterness ordering of lives is obviously not tight: it is not true of every pair of lives that one is determinately better than the other or else they are determinately equally good. The goodness of a life is a nebulous property. But this obvious fact is rarely recognized in population axiology. This chapter recognizes it. It provides a way of formalizing a loose betterness ordering of goodness for lives and fits it into utilitarian theory t…
Normativity, Rationality and Reasoning
This book is a selection of my recent papers on normativity, rationality and reasoning. It covers a variety of topics that fall under these three subjects: the meanings of ‘ought’, ‘reason’ and ‘reasons’; the fundamental structure of normativity and the metaphysical priority of ought over reasons; the ownership—or agent-relativity—of oughts and reasons; the distinction between rationality and normativity; the notion of rational motivation; what c…
The first normative ‘reason’
The first recorded use in English of the word ‘reason’ to refer to a normative reason occurs in a manuscript of the Ancrene Riwle from about 1225. It was used to refer to an explanation of why one ought to do something.
Normativity, Rationality, and Reasoning
Incommensurateness Is Vagueness
We often encounter pairs of objects where neither seems better than the other, and yet they do not seem to be equally good. I say they are “incommensurate.” The aim of this chapter is to argue that incommensurateness is no more than the vagueness of comparative relations such as betterness. Other relations besides betterness exhibit incommensurateness. For example, we may encounter two colors where neither seems redder than the other, and yet the…
Greta Thunberg
What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion
The Repugnant Conclusion is an implication of some approaches to population ethics. It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living. (Parfit 1984: 388)
Responses to Commentaries on ‘Rationality Versus Normativity
I am very grateful to the ten authors who have written commentaries on my paper. I am overwhelmed by the number of interesting and useful arguments they have made. I cannot come near to responding
Rationality versus Normativity
Philosophers often do not make as sharp a distinction as they should between rationality and normativity. Partly this is because the word ‘reason’ can be used to refer to either, and this leads to a confusion over meanings. This paper starts by clarifying the meanings of ‘normativity’ and ‘rationality’. It argues that it is a conceptual truth that rationality supervenes on the mind. Then it considers substantive arguments that purport to show the…
Lessons from Economics
Economics offers several lessons that moral philosophers can beneficially learn. They are useful for topics in moral philosophy that are inherently quantitative. This chapter gives some examples. Some of these quantitative topics also fall within the subject matter of economics, and economists have made useful, substantive discoveries about them. Ignoring these discoveries hampers the progress of philosophy. This chapter illustrates this sort of …
The Badness of Dying Early
A common intuition suggests that it is less bad for an infant to die than for a young adult to die. This is puzzling because the infant has more life ahead of her than a young adult, so it seems she loses more when she dies. Jeff McMahan supports the common intuition and defends it by means of what he calls the “Time-Relative Interest Account” of the badness of death. I shall describe two possible interpretations of the Time-Relative Interest Acc…
Reason Fundamentalism and What Is Wrong With It
Is there a fundamental feature of normativity, to which other features can be reduced? One defensible view is that the fundamental feature is the relation that holds between a person and F-ing when the person has reason to F. (“F” stands for any verb phrase, such as “run for the bus” or “hope for relief” or “believe Kampala is in Ghana.”) Another defensible view is that the fundamental feature is the relation that holds between a person and F-ing…
Weighing Goods
Economics and Ethics
General and Personal Good
Equality Versus Priority
Both egalitarianism and prioritarianism give value to equality. Prioritarianism has an additively separable value function whereas egalitarianism does not. I show that in some cases prioritarianism and egalitarianism necessarily have different implications: I describe two alternatives G and H such that egalitarianism necessarily implies G is better than H whereas prioritarianism necessarily implies G and H are equally good. I also raise a doubt a…
Précis of Rationality Through Reasoning
Responses to Setiya, Hussain, and Horty
Normativity in Reasoning
Reasoning is a process through which premise‐attitudes give rise to a conclusion‐attitude. When you reason actively you operate on the propositions that are the contents of your premise‐attitudes, following a rule, to derive a new proposition that is the content of your conclusion‐attitude. It may seem that, when you follow a rule, you must, at least implicitly, have the normative belief that you ought to comply with the rule, which guides you to…
Rationality Through Reasoning
A Small Chance of Disaster
Expected utility theory tells us how we should make decisions under uncertainty: we should choose the option that leads to the greatest expectation of utility. This may, however, not be the option that is likely to produce the best result – that may be the wrong choice if it also creates a small chance of a great disaster. A small chance of disaster may be the most important consideration in decision making. Climate change creates a small chance …
Normative Requirements
Normative requirements are often overlooked, but they are central features of the normative world. Rationality is often thought to consist in acting for reasons, but following normative requirements is also a major part of rationality. In particular, correct reasoning – both theoretical and practical – is governed by normative requirements rather than by reasons. This article explains the nature of normative requirements, and gives examples of th…
Weighing Goods
Discounting the Future
Counting the Cost of Global Warming
Journal Article Counting the Cost of Global Warming Get access Counting the Cost of Global Warming. By Broome (John) . (Cambridge: The White Horse Press, 1992. Pp. viii+147. £24.95 hardback, £9.95 paperback. ISBN 1 874267 01 4, 1 874267 00 6.) Wilfred Beckerman Wilfred Beckerman Balliol College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 421, 1 November 1993, Pages 1552–…
Uncertainty and Fairness
Journal Article Uncertainty and Fairness Get access John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 94, Issue 375, 1 September 1984, Pages 624–632, https://doi.org/10.2307/2232707 Published: 01 September 1984
Kamm on Fairness
Chapters 5, 6 and 7 of Frances Kamm's Morality, Mortality, Volume ]1 deal with a classic problem. Suppose you are faced with the choice between saving the lives of five people on the one hand, and on the other hand the life of just one person who is not among the five. How should you choose? An obvious answer is that you should save the five, on the grounds that saving five lives does more good than saving one. But in his 'Should the numbers coun…
Should We Value Population
Normativity in Reasoning
Reasoning is a process through which premise‐attitudes give rise to a conclusion‐attitude. When you reason actively you operate on the propositions that are the contents of your premise‐attitudes, following a rule, to derive a new proposition that is the content of your conclusion‐attitude. It may seem that, when you follow a rule, you must, at least implicitly, have the normative belief that you ought to comply with the rule, which guides you to…
Rationality versus Normativity
Philosophers often do not make as sharp a distinction as they should between rationality and normativity. Partly this is because the word ‘reason’ can be used to refer to either, and this leads to a confusion over meanings. This paper starts by clarifying the meanings of ‘normativity’ and ‘rationality’. It argues that it is a conceptual truth that rationality supervenes on the mind. Then it considers substantive arguments that purport to show the…
What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion
The Repugnant Conclusion is an implication of some approaches to population ethics. It states, in Derek Parfit's original formulation, For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living. (Parfit 1984: 388)
The Economic Value of Life
determined. The morally significant differences between the states can be classified under three headings. First, there is length of life: at least one person lives longer in one state than in the other. Second, there is wellbeing: since life-saving uses up resources, on the whole people will be worse off in the state where lives are saved. But there will usually be exceptions. Saving a life usually benefits several people, including the person w…
Reply to Vallentyne
A Small Chance of Disaster
Expected utility theory tells us how we should make decisions under uncertainty: we should choose the option that leads to the greatest expectation of utility. This may, however, not be the option that is likely to produce the best result – that may be the wrong choice if it also creates a small chance of a great disaster. A small chance of disaster may be the most important consideration in decision making. Climate change creates a small chance …
No Argument against the Continuity of Value
Dorsey rejects Conclusion, so he believes he must reject one of the premises. He argues that the best option is to reject Premise 3. Rejecting Premise 3 entails a certain sort of discontinuity in value. So Dorsey believes he has an argument for discontinuity
The value of life and the value of population
Skorupski on Agent-Neutrality
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Inequality Reexamined
Journal Article Inequality Reexamined Get access Inequality Reexamined. By Amartya Sen. (Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 1992. Pp. xiv + 207. £19.95 hardback. ISBN 0 19 828334 2.) John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 419, 1 July 1993, Pages 1067–1069, https://doi.org/10.2307/2234727 Published: 01 July 1993
Perverse Prices
Journal Article Perverse Prices Get access John Broome John Broome Birkbeck College Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 88, Issue 352, 1 December 1978, Pages 778–787, https://doi.org/10.2307/2231978 Published: 01 December 1978 Article history Received: 01 March 1978 Published: 01 December 1978
Lectures on the Theory of Production
Perverse Prices
Journal Article Perverse Prices Get access John Broome John Broome Birkbeck College Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 88, Issue 352, 1 December 1978, Pages 778–787, https://doi.org/10.2307/2231978 Published: 01 December 1978 Article history Received: 01 March 1978 Published: 01 December 1978
Uncertainty and Fairness
Journal Article Uncertainty and Fairness Get access John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 94, Issue 375, 1 September 1984, Pages 624–632, https://doi.org/10.2307/2232707 Published: 01 September 1984
The Economic Value of Life
determined. The morally significant differences between the states can be classified under three headings. First, there is length of life: at least one person lives longer in one state than in the other. Second, there is wellbeing: since life-saving uses up resources, on the whole people will be worse off in the state where lives are saved. But there will usually be exceptions. Saving a life usually benefits several people, including the person w…
The Economics Value of Life
Expected utility theory tells us that the value (the expected utility) of a prospect is linear in probabilities. So the value of changing a probability (the change in expected utility) is proportional to the size of the change. The value of saving a person from certain death is i/p times the value of saving her from a chance p of dying. This is the main point I wanted to make in the paragraph on which M. W. Jones-Lee comments, and he offers no ob…
Good, Fairness and Qalys
Counting QALYs (quality adjusted life years) has been proposed as a way of deciding how resources should be distributed in the health service: put resources where they will produce the most QALYs. This proposal has encountered strong opposition. There has been a disagreement between some economists favouring QALYs and some philosophers opposing them. But the argument has, I think, mostly been at cross-purposes. Those in favour of QALYs point out …
The Reason of Rules
In his foreword, Robert D Tollison identifies the main objective of Geoffrey Brennan and James M Buchanan's THE REASON OF RULES: ...a book-length attempt to focus the energies of economists and other social analysts on the nature and function of the rules under which ordinary political life and market life function. In persuasive style, Brennan and Buchanan argue that too often economists become mired in explaining the obvious or constructing ela…
Memory Mate Versio 3.02R
A Treatise on Social Justice
Journal Article A Treatise on Social Justice: Volume I: Theories of Justice Get access A Treatise on Social Justice: Volume I: Theories of Justice. By BRIAN BARRY. (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989. Pp. xv + 428. £30.00 hardback. ISBN 0 74500641 8). John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 100, Issue 403, 1 December 1990, Pages 13…
V—Fairness
V—Fairness Get access John Broome John Broome Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 91, Issue 1, 1 June 1991, Pages 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/91.1.87 Published: 09 September 2015
WordPerfect Version 5.1
Journal Article WordPerfect Version 5.1 Get access WordPerfect Version 5.1, distributed by WordPerfect UK, Weybridge Business Park, Addlestone Road, Weybridge, KT15 2UU. Requires DOS 3.0 or above. Price à à à à £425; à à à à £85 with educational discount. John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 101, Issue 407, 1 July 1991, Pages 1025–1027, …
WordPerfect Office PC, Version 3.0
Journal Article WordPerfect Office PC, Version 3.0 Get access WordPerfect Office PC, Version 3.0, distributed by WordPerfect UK, Weybridge Business Park, Addlestone Road, Weybridge, KT15 2UU. Requires DOS 3.0 or above. Price à £110; with educational discount à £44. John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 101, Issue 406, 1 May 1991, Pages 67…
Weighing Goods
Inequality Reexamined
Journal Article Inequality Reexamined Get access Inequality Reexamined. By Amartya Sen. (Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 1992. Pp. xiv + 207. £19.95 hardback. ISBN 0 19 828334 2.) John Broome John Broome University of Bristol Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 419, 1 July 1993, Pages 1067–1069, https://doi.org/10.2307/2234727 Published: 01 July 1993
Counting the Cost of Global Warming
Journal Article Counting the Cost of Global Warming Get access Counting the Cost of Global Warming. By Broome (John) . (Cambridge: The White Horse Press, 1992. Pp. viii+147. £24.95 hardback, £9.95 paperback. ISBN 1 874267 01 4, 1 874267 00 6.) Wilfred Beckerman Wilfred Beckerman Balliol College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 421, 1 November 1993, Pages 1552–…
Weighing Goods
Journal Article Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time Get access Weighing goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. By Broome (John) . (Oxford: BasilBlackwell, 1991. Pp. x + 255. £27-50 hardback. ISBN 0 631 17199 1.) Prasanta K. Pattanaik Prasanta K. Pattanaik University of California (Riverside) Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 418, 1 May 1993, Pages 752–753, h…
The Value of a Person
John Broome, Adam Morton; The Value of a Person, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Volume 68, Issue 1, 1 July 1994, Pages 167–198, https://doi.org
Fairness versus Doing the Most Good
The Oregon plan is perhaps the most explicit scheme that has yet been devised for rationing medical services. The state of Oregon drew up a list of pairs, each consisting of a particular medical condition together with a particular treatment for it. It arranged these pairs in a ranking from the one it considered most valuable to the one it considered least valuable. It then marked a borderline between those it is prepared to fund through Medicaid…
Structured and Unstructured Valuation
Economists can value things for cost-benefit analysis using either a structured or an unstructured approach. The first imposes some theoretical structure on the valuation; the second does not. This paper explains the difference between the approaches and examines the relative merits of each. Cost-benefit analysis may be aimed at finding what would be the best action, or alternatively at finding which action should be done in a democracy. The pape…
Counting the Cost of Global Warming
Discounting the Future
Skorupski on Agent-Neutrality
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Economics and Philosophy
The value of life and the value of population
Counting the Cost of Global Warming
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Counting the Cost of Global Warming. By John Broome. (Cambridge: White Horse Press, 1992. Pp. viii + 147. Price £24.95.) Dale Jamieson Dale Jamieson University of Colorado at Boulder Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 46, Issue 183, April 1996, Pages 263–266, https://doi.org/10.2307/2956401 Published: 01 April 1996
Economics (34 obras) · Computer Science (27 obras) · Epistemology (27 obras) · Philosophy (27 obras) · Sociology (26 obras) · Political science (21 obras) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (18 obras) · Positive economics (16 obras) · Law (15 obras) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (15 obras)