Albert R Matheny
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 1493367 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Albert R Matheny |
| NOMBRES | Albert R |
| APELLIDO | Matheny |
| FIRMA | MATHENY A R |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Florida |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 9 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 77 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1979 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2000 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Regulating Contested Local Hazards
This article uses focus group data to explore the connection between scientific uncertainty about environmental risks and the emergence of distrust among local populations, regulators, and technical experts affected by those risks. With data from a nationwide study of issues associated with the cleanup of U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, the article uses “dialogue theory” and focus group data from three locations to identify the sources of miscom…
Judicial Reform and Rationalization
Explaining the diffusion of judicial reform policies among the American states is an elusive task. Are such policies simply part of the larger policy process revealed in the comparative state policy literature? Or b court reform a policy arena unto itself, responding to factors uniquely legal or professional in nature? Our inquiry begins with Max Weber's sociology of law from which we adopt his concept of rationalization as a schema of policy dev…
Knowledge vs. Nimby
Testing Theories of Social Regulation
Much current debate over "the new social regulation" results from failure to test empirically differing assertions about three critical relationships that underlie its politics: (1) the relationship between market failure and social regulation; (2) the impact of the economic strength of regulated industries on the regulatory process; and (3) the effect of organized public interest groups on the regulatory process. This paper empirically tests com…
Regulation, Risk Assessment, and the Supreme Court
As a case study of policy distortion in the legal and regulatory processes, this article first establishes the incongruities among the political, scientific, and legal issues surrounding OSHA's Cancer Policy and then examines the political consequences of ignoring these incongruities in judicial and administrative decisions about that policy. By delineating the political, scientific, and legal issues involved, we develop a basis for assessing the…
A Reply
Scientific Disputes and Adversary Procedures in Policy‐making
Negotiation and Plea Bargaining Models
This article assesses the contributions to our understanding of plea bargaining made by economic and decision‐theory models of criminal justice decision‐making. The author introduces an organizational interpretation of plea bargaining and critiques two of the more prominent attempts at formal modeling of the criminal process. Empirical evidence, gathered by others, is reanalyzed to compare the relative explanatory power of these formal models in …
A Bibliography on Plea Bargaining
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Testing Theories of Social Regulation
Much current debate over "the new social regulation" results from failure to test empirically differing assertions about three critical relationships that underlie its politics: (1) the relationship between market failure and social regulation; (2) the impact of the economic strength of regulated industries on the regulatory process; and (3) the effect of organized public interest groups on the regulatory process. This paper empirically tests com…
Knowledge vs. Nimby
Regulating Contested Local Hazards
This article uses focus group data to explore the connection between scientific uncertainty about environmental risks and the emergence of distrust among local populations, regulators, and technical experts affected by those risks. With data from a nationwide study of issues associated with the cleanup of U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, the article uses “dialogue theory” and focus group data from three locations to identify the sources of miscom…
Regulation, Risk Assessment, and the Supreme Court
As a case study of policy distortion in the legal and regulatory processes, this article first establishes the incongruities among the political, scientific, and legal issues surrounding OSHA's Cancer Policy and then examines the political consequences of ignoring these incongruities in judicial and administrative decisions about that policy. By delineating the political, scientific, and legal issues involved, we develop a basis for assessing the…
Judicial Reform and Rationalization
Explaining the diffusion of judicial reform policies among the American states is an elusive task. Are such policies simply part of the larger policy process revealed in the comparative state policy literature? Or b court reform a policy arena unto itself, responding to factors uniquely legal or professional in nature? Our inquiry begins with Max Weber's sociology of law from which we adopt his concept of rationalization as a schema of policy dev…
Scientific Disputes and Adversary Procedures in Policy‐making
Negotiation and Plea Bargaining Models
This article assesses the contributions to our understanding of plea bargaining made by economic and decision‐theory models of criminal justice decision‐making. The author introduces an organizational interpretation of plea bargaining and critiques two of the more prominent attempts at formal modeling of the criminal process. Empirical evidence, gathered by others, is reanalyzed to compare the relative explanatory power of these formal models in …
A Bibliography on Plea Bargaining
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
A Bibliography on Plea Bargaining
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Negotiation and Plea Bargaining Models
This article assesses the contributions to our understanding of plea bargaining made by economic and decision‐theory models of criminal justice decision‐making. The author introduces an organizational interpretation of plea bargaining and critiques two of the more prominent attempts at formal modeling of the criminal process. Empirical evidence, gathered by others, is reanalyzed to compare the relative explanatory power of these formal models in …
A Reply
Scientific Disputes and Adversary Procedures in Policy‐making
Testing Theories of Social Regulation
Much current debate over "the new social regulation" results from failure to test empirically differing assertions about three critical relationships that underlie its politics: (1) the relationship between market failure and social regulation; (2) the impact of the economic strength of regulated industries on the regulatory process; and (3) the effect of organized public interest groups on the regulatory process. This paper empirically tests com…
Regulation, Risk Assessment, and the Supreme Court
As a case study of policy distortion in the legal and regulatory processes, this article first establishes the incongruities among the political, scientific, and legal issues surrounding OSHA's Cancer Policy and then examines the political consequences of ignoring these incongruities in judicial and administrative decisions about that policy. By delineating the political, scientific, and legal issues involved, we develop a basis for assessing the…
Knowledge vs. Nimby
Judicial Reform and Rationalization
Explaining the diffusion of judicial reform policies among the American states is an elusive task. Are such policies simply part of the larger policy process revealed in the comparative state policy literature? Or b court reform a policy arena unto itself, responding to factors uniquely legal or professional in nature? Our inquiry begins with Max Weber's sociology of law from which we adopt his concept of rationalization as a schema of policy dev…
Regulating Contested Local Hazards
This article uses focus group data to explore the connection between scientific uncertainty about environmental risks and the emergence of distrust among local populations, regulators, and technical experts affected by those risks. With data from a nationwide study of issues associated with the cleanup of U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, the article uses “dialogue theory” and focus group data from three locations to identify the sources of miscom…
Law (8 obras) · Law (8 obras) · Political science (8 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Economics (5 obras) · Law and economics (4 obras) · Politics (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (3 obras) · Library science (3 obras)