Michael J Barry
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 1743859 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Michael J Barry |
| NOMBRES | Michael J |
| APELLIDO | Barry |
| FIRMA | BARRY M J |
| AFILIACIONES | Massachusetts General Hospital |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6508-7109 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 18 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 18 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1987 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2021 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Importance Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death for both men and women, with an estimated 52 980 persons in the US projected to die of colorectal cancer in 2021. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among persons aged 65 to 74 years. It is estimated that 10.5% of new colorectal cancer cases occur in persons younger than 50 years. Incidence of colorectal cancer (specifically adenocarcinoma) in adults aged 40 to 49…
Validation of the Impact Index
Let’s Require Patients to Review a High-quality Decision Aid Before Receiving Important Tests and Treatments
THE PROBLEM When providing medical care, choices often must be made among 2 or more medically reasonable options. In the United States, and elsewhere, most of those decisions are made by physicians, with patients being relatively uninformed and uninvolved, sometimes not even knowing more than 1 option existed.1–3 Many prominent groups have called for more shared decision making, asking physicians to make efforts to provide patients faced with a d…
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
BACKGROUND: Decision aids are interventions that support patients by making their decisions explicit, providing information about options and associated benefits/harms, and helping clarify congruence between decisions and personal values. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of decision aids in people facing treatment or screening decisions. SEARCH METHODS: Updated search (2012 to April 2015) in CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; and grey literatur…
Audio‐video decision support for patients
Objective Decision support tools are increasingly using audio‐visual materials. However, disagreement exists about the use of audio‐visual materials as they may be subjective and biased. Methods This is a literature review of the major texts for documentary film studies to extrapolate issues of objectivity and bias from film to decision support tools. Results The key features of documentary films are that they attempt to portray real events and t…
Shared Decision Making
The principles of shared decision making are well documented but there is a lack of guidance about how to accomplish the approach in routine clinical practice. Our aim here is to translate existing conceptual descriptions into a three-step model that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development. Achieving shared decision making depends on building a good relationship in the clinical encounter so that information is …
Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
Interview with Michael Barry on patient-centered care and shared decision making. (22:22)Download The most important attribute of patient-centered care is the active engagement of patients when fateful health care decisions must be made — when they arrive at a crossroads of medical options, where diverging paths have different and important consequences.
Shared Decision Making
See also The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of good decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments, by Joseph‐Williams et al
Documenting the Genie's Escape
General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA Reprints: Michael Barry, MD, General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, President, Foundation for informed Medical Decision Making, Boston, MA. e-mail: [email protected]
Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions
Background Women with early‐stage breast cancer face a multitude of decisions. The quality of a decision can be measured by the extent to which the treatment reflects what is most important to an informed patient. Reliable and valid measures of patients’ knowledge and their goals and concerns related to breast cancer treatments are needed to assess the decision quality. Objective To identify a set of key facts and goals relevant to each of three …
The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice
There is a move - which originated in England and Wales but is now infiltrating Scottish criminal justice policy and practice - towards increased managerialism and auditing within criminal justice social work supervision and towards more formalized and tenuous relationships between worker and service user. It is suggested that this runs contrary to the needs and expectations of offenders themselves, who rarely have the opportunity to contribute t…
The Effect of a Shared Decisionmaking Program on Rates of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Pilot Results
Wagner, Edward H. MD, MPH; Barrett, Paul MD, MSPH; Barry, Michael J. MD; Barlow, William PhD; Fowler, Floyd J. Jr. PhD Author Information
Patient Reactions to a Program Designed to Facilitate Patient Participation in Treatment Decisions for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Patients often want considerable information about their conditions, and enhanced patient participation might reduce unwanted practice variation and improve medical decisions. The authors assessed how men with benign prostatic hyperplasia reacted to an education program designed to facilitate participation in decisionmaking, and how strongly ratings of their symptom state and the prospect of complications predicted their treatment choice. A prosp…
Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models
This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include …
Privatization, conversion, and restructuring in Russia's military‐industrial complex
Given the prominent role that defense industry plays in Russia's economy, thorough reform of the military‐industrial complex will be a necessary condition for success in Russia's overall economic transformation. Because all aspects of defense industry reform are intimately interrelated, a discussion of any one problem in isolation necessarily understates the difficulties of the multifaceted reform required. This article will address three critica…
Advance Directives
Advance directives have been widely endorsed as a method to match medical interventions to patients' preferences. However, applying advance directives to unspecified future decisions may be problematic. We wondered how well scenario-based treatment choices in advance directives can be used to infer other choices specified by the same patients. We asked 495 out-patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital to state 11 treatment choices in each …
Where Do We Go From Here
Bergner, Marilyn PhD; Barry, Michael J. MD; Bowman, Marjorie A. MD, MPA; Doyle, M Anne; Guess, Harry A. MD, PhD; Nutting, Paul A. MD Author Information
Human experimentation
The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice
There is a move - which originated in England and Wales but is now infiltrating Scottish criminal justice policy and practice - towards increased managerialism and auditing within criminal justice social work supervision and towards more formalized and tenuous relationships between worker and service user. It is suggested that this runs contrary to the needs and expectations of offenders themselves, who rarely have the opportunity to contribute t…
Human experimentation
Where Do We Go From Here
Bergner, Marilyn PhD; Barry, Michael J. MD; Bowman, Marjorie A. MD, MPA; Doyle, M Anne; Guess, Harry A. MD, PhD; Nutting, Paul A. MD Author Information
Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models
This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include …
Privatization, conversion, and restructuring in Russia's military‐industrial complex
Given the prominent role that defense industry plays in Russia's economy, thorough reform of the military‐industrial complex will be a necessary condition for success in Russia's overall economic transformation. Because all aspects of defense industry reform are intimately interrelated, a discussion of any one problem in isolation necessarily understates the difficulties of the multifaceted reform required. This article will address three critica…
Advance Directives
Advance directives have been widely endorsed as a method to match medical interventions to patients' preferences. However, applying advance directives to unspecified future decisions may be problematic. We wondered how well scenario-based treatment choices in advance directives can be used to infer other choices specified by the same patients. We asked 495 out-patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital to state 11 treatment choices in each …
The Effect of a Shared Decisionmaking Program on Rates of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Pilot Results
Wagner, Edward H. MD, MPH; Barrett, Paul MD, MSPH; Barry, Michael J. MD; Barlow, William PhD; Fowler, Floyd J. Jr. PhD Author Information
Patient Reactions to a Program Designed to Facilitate Patient Participation in Treatment Decisions for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Patients often want considerable information about their conditions, and enhanced patient participation might reduce unwanted practice variation and improve medical decisions. The authors assessed how men with benign prostatic hyperplasia reacted to an education program designed to facilitate participation in decisionmaking, and how strongly ratings of their symptom state and the prospect of complications predicted their treatment choice. A prosp…
The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice
There is a move - which originated in England and Wales but is now infiltrating Scottish criminal justice policy and practice - towards increased managerialism and auditing within criminal justice social work supervision and towards more formalized and tenuous relationships between worker and service user. It is suggested that this runs contrary to the needs and expectations of offenders themselves, who rarely have the opportunity to contribute t…
Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions
Background Women with early‐stage breast cancer face a multitude of decisions. The quality of a decision can be measured by the extent to which the treatment reflects what is most important to an informed patient. Reliable and valid measures of patients’ knowledge and their goals and concerns related to breast cancer treatments are needed to assess the decision quality. Objective To identify a set of key facts and goals relevant to each of three …
Shared Decision Making
See also The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of good decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments, by Joseph‐Williams et al
Documenting the Genie's Escape
General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA Reprints: Michael Barry, MD, General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, President, Foundation for informed Medical Decision Making, Boston, MA. e-mail: [email protected]
Shared Decision Making
The principles of shared decision making are well documented but there is a lack of guidance about how to accomplish the approach in routine clinical practice. Our aim here is to translate existing conceptual descriptions into a three-step model that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development. Achieving shared decision making depends on building a good relationship in the clinical encounter so that information is …
Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
Interview with Michael Barry on patient-centered care and shared decision making. (22:22)Download The most important attribute of patient-centered care is the active engagement of patients when fateful health care decisions must be made — when they arrive at a crossroads of medical options, where diverging paths have different and important consequences.
Audio‐video decision support for patients
Objective Decision support tools are increasingly using audio‐visual materials. However, disagreement exists about the use of audio‐visual materials as they may be subjective and biased. Methods This is a literature review of the major texts for documentary film studies to extrapolate issues of objectivity and bias from film to decision support tools. Results The key features of documentary films are that they attempt to portray real events and t…
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
BACKGROUND: Decision aids are interventions that support patients by making their decisions explicit, providing information about options and associated benefits/harms, and helping clarify congruence between decisions and personal values. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of decision aids in people facing treatment or screening decisions. SEARCH METHODS: Updated search (2012 to April 2015) in CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; and grey literatur…
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Importance Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death for both men and women, with an estimated 52 980 persons in the US projected to die of colorectal cancer in 2021. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among persons aged 65 to 74 years. It is estimated that 10.5% of new colorectal cancer cases occur in persons younger than 50 years. Incidence of colorectal cancer (specifically adenocarcinoma) in adults aged 40 to 49…
Validation of the Impact Index
Let’s Require Patients to Review a High-quality Decision Aid Before Receiving Important Tests and Treatments
THE PROBLEM When providing medical care, choices often must be made among 2 or more medically reasonable options. In the United States, and elsewhere, most of those decisions are made by physicians, with patients being relatively uninformed and uninvolved, sometimes not even knowing more than 1 option existed.1–3 Many prominent groups have called for more shared decision making, asking physicians to make efforts to provide patients faced with a d…
Medicine (14 obras) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 obras) · Computer Science (6 obras) · Political science (6 obras) · Internal Medicine (5 obras) · MEDLINE (5 obras) · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 obras) · Alternative medicine (4 obras) · Decision aids (4 obras) · Family medicine (4 obras)