David Fetterman
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 183266 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | David Fetterman |
| NOMBRES | David |
| APELLIDO | Fetterman |
| FIRMA | FETTERMAN D |
| AFILIACIONES | Stanford University |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 10 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 41 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 1 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1981 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2015 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Empowerment evaluation and action research
Speaking the language of power
Words as the commodity of discourse - influencing power, D.M. Fetterman ethnographic research on AIDS risk behaviour and the making of policy, M.R. Weeks and J.J. Schensul communicating evaluation findings as a process - the case for delaying gratification, J. Christman and E. Simon massaging soft data, or making the skeptical more supple, M. Jo McGee Brown gaining acceptance from participants, clients and policy-makers for qualitative research, …
Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation
Defining, compartmentalizing, and differentiating among stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation, such as collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation, enhance conceptual clarity. It also informs practice, helping evaluators select the most appropriate approach for the task at hand. This view of science and practice is presented in response to the argument of Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha (2013) that efforts to differentiate a…
Empowerment Evaluation
Empowerment evaluation continues to crystallize central issues for evaluators and the field of evaluation. A highly attended American Evaluation Association conference panel, titled “Empowerment Evaluation and Traditional Evaluation: 10 Years Later,” provided an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of empowerment evaluation. Several of the presentations were expanded and published in the American Journal of Evaluation. In the spirit of dialogu…
Empowerment and Ethnographic Evaluation
A Faith-Based Intergenerational Health and Wellness Program
The purpose of this program was to create an inter-generational, faith-based health and wellness program for kinship caregivers and their families (i.e., grandparents and other relatives who are raising children andtheir children's children). The program took place over a 12-week period in a faith-based setting and focused on education in (a) Health, Exercise, Nutrition and Stress Management; (b) Parenting Education; and (c) Religious Practices (…
Million Hewlett-Packard Digital Village
Summary of the STEP Evaluation
This section presents interviews with evaluators whose work can illustrate, in a specific evaluation study, the application of different models, theories, and princi-ples described in evaluation literature. These interviews should also exemplify the choices that evaluators make in the course of planning and conducting an evalu-ation. Entries in this section will begin with a brief description of the evaluation to provide a foundation for the inte…
Guilty Knowledge, Dirty Hands, and Other Ethical Dilemmas
Field-workers encounter numerous personal and professional hazards in contract research. A few potentially hazardous situations include entrance into the field, role conflicts, fieldwork in the inner city, ethnographic reports, and dissemination of findings. Job stress and burnout pose an additional problem. Urban fieldwork in particular forces an ethnographer to confront the realities of guilty knowledge—confidential knowledge of illegal activit…
Blaming the Victim
Empowerment Evaluation
Empowerment evaluation continues to crystallize central issues for evaluators and the field of evaluation. A highly attended American Evaluation Association conference panel, titled “Empowerment Evaluation and Traditional Evaluation: 10 Years Later,” provided an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of empowerment evaluation. Several of the presentations were expanded and published in the American Journal of Evaluation. In the spirit of dialogu…
Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation
Defining, compartmentalizing, and differentiating among stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation, such as collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation, enhance conceptual clarity. It also informs practice, helping evaluators select the most appropriate approach for the task at hand. This view of science and practice is presented in response to the argument of Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha (2013) that efforts to differentiate a…
Guilty Knowledge, Dirty Hands, and Other Ethical Dilemmas
Field-workers encounter numerous personal and professional hazards in contract research. A few potentially hazardous situations include entrance into the field, role conflicts, fieldwork in the inner city, ethnographic reports, and dissemination of findings. Job stress and burnout pose an additional problem. Urban fieldwork in particular forces an ethnographer to confront the realities of guilty knowledge—confidential knowledge of illegal activit…
Blaming the Victim
Empowerment and Ethnographic Evaluation
A Faith-Based Intergenerational Health and Wellness Program
The purpose of this program was to create an inter-generational, faith-based health and wellness program for kinship caregivers and their families (i.e., grandparents and other relatives who are raising children andtheir children's children). The program took place over a 12-week period in a faith-based setting and focused on education in (a) Health, Exercise, Nutrition and Stress Management; (b) Parenting Education; and (c) Religious Practices (…
Summary of the STEP Evaluation
This section presents interviews with evaluators whose work can illustrate, in a specific evaluation study, the application of different models, theories, and princi-ples described in evaluation literature. These interviews should also exemplify the choices that evaluators make in the course of planning and conducting an evalu-ation. Entries in this section will begin with a brief description of the evaluation to provide a foundation for the inte…
Blaming the Victim
Guilty Knowledge, Dirty Hands, and Other Ethical Dilemmas
Field-workers encounter numerous personal and professional hazards in contract research. A few potentially hazardous situations include entrance into the field, role conflicts, fieldwork in the inner city, ethnographic reports, and dissemination of findings. Job stress and burnout pose an additional problem. Urban fieldwork in particular forces an ethnographer to confront the realities of guilty knowledge—confidential knowledge of illegal activit…
Summary of the STEP Evaluation
This section presents interviews with evaluators whose work can illustrate, in a specific evaluation study, the application of different models, theories, and princi-ples described in evaluation literature. These interviews should also exemplify the choices that evaluators make in the course of planning and conducting an evalu-ation. Entries in this section will begin with a brief description of the evaluation to provide a foundation for the inte…
A Faith-Based Intergenerational Health and Wellness Program
The purpose of this program was to create an inter-generational, faith-based health and wellness program for kinship caregivers and their families (i.e., grandparents and other relatives who are raising children andtheir children's children). The program took place over a 12-week period in a faith-based setting and focused on education in (a) Health, Exercise, Nutrition and Stress Management; (b) Parenting Education; and (c) Religious Practices (…
Million Hewlett-Packard Digital Village
Empowerment and Ethnographic Evaluation
Empowerment Evaluation
Empowerment evaluation continues to crystallize central issues for evaluators and the field of evaluation. A highly attended American Evaluation Association conference panel, titled “Empowerment Evaluation and Traditional Evaluation: 10 Years Later,” provided an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of empowerment evaluation. Several of the presentations were expanded and published in the American Journal of Evaluation. In the spirit of dialogu…
Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation
Defining, compartmentalizing, and differentiating among stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation, such as collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation, enhance conceptual clarity. It also informs practice, helping evaluators select the most appropriate approach for the task at hand. This view of science and practice is presented in response to the argument of Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha (2013) that efforts to differentiate a…
Speaking the language of power
Words as the commodity of discourse - influencing power, D.M. Fetterman ethnographic research on AIDS risk behaviour and the making of policy, M.R. Weeks and J.J. Schensul communicating evaluation findings as a process - the case for delaying gratification, J. Christman and E. Simon massaging soft data, or making the skeptical more supple, M. Jo McGee Brown gaining acceptance from participants, clients and policy-makers for qualitative research, …
Empowerment evaluation and action research
Political science (7 obras) · Psychology (7 obras) · Sociology (7 obras) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 obras) · Empowerment (5 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Community Health and Development (4 obras) · Computer Science (4 obras) · Public relations (4 obras) · Engineering (3 obras)