Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Daniel M Oppenheimer

Datos Biográficos

ID302344
NOMBREDaniel M Oppenheimer
NOMBRESDaniel M
APELLIDOOppenheimer
FIRMAOPPENHEIMER D M
AFILIACIONESPrinceton University
ORCID0000-0002-2363-4220
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS23
TOTAL DE CITAS329
TOTAL COMO AUTOR23
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2006
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2025
ÍNDICE H4
  • Assessing metacognitive knowledge in subjective decisions

    Trent N Cash, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Thinking & Reasoning•2025

    Subjective, multi-attribute choice decisions – such as whom to marry or which college to attend – play a substantial role in decision makers’ long-term well-being. However, the metacognition literature lacks tools for assessing metacognitive capacities in subjective decisions. We present three studies in which we propose and validate the Knowledge of Weights (KoW) paradigm, a novel method for assessing metacognitive knowledge of attribute weights…

  • The latent scope bias

    Open Access•Sangeet Khemlani, Samuel G B Johnson et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2024

  • Visual numerosity perception shows no advantage in real-world scenes compared to artificial displays

    Open Access•Darko Odic, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Cognition•2023

  • The “Effort Elephant” in the Room

    Open Access•Keela S Thomson, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

    Despite decades of research in the fields of judgment and decision-making, social psychology, cognitive psychology, human-machine interaction, behavioral economics, and neuroscience, we still do not know what “cognitive effort” is. The definitions in use are often imprecise and sometimes diametrically opposed. Researchers with different assumptions talk past each other, and many aspects of effort conservation remain untested and difficult to meas…

  • How people deal with …………………………. outliers

    Open Access•Jennifer E Dannals, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2022

    People regularly make sense of distributions that are complicated by noise. How do individuals determine whether an outlying observation should be incorporated into one's understanding of the true distribution of the population or considered a fluke that ought to be disregarded? In a simple prediction task, we examine how individuals incorporate outliers and compare their behavior to various prescriptive models (e.g., averaging and tests of disco…

  • The effect of effects on effectiveness

    Open Access•Abigail B Sussman, 邦彦 山口 et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2020

    Beliefs about how effective a cause will be at achieving possible outcomes are critical inputs into a range of decisions, from how to treat an illness to which products to purchase. We identify scope-the number of distinct outcomes a cause is known to achieve-as an important input into judgments of efficacy. We compare causes that lead to worse outcomes (i.e., banes) to those leading to improvements (i.e., boons). People believe that banes with b…

  • The policy consequences of cascade blindness

    Open Access•Adam Elga, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Behavioural Public Policy•2018•Referencias: 4

    One way to reduce waste and to make a system more robust is to allow its components to pool resources. For example, banks might insure each other or share a common capital reserve. Systems whose resources have been pooled in this way are highly prevalent in such diverse domains as finance, infrastructure, health care, emergency response and engineering. However, these systems have a combination of characteristics that leave them vulnerable to poo…

  • Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

    Open Access•Keela S Thomson, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Judgment and Decision Making•2016

    Much research in cognitive psychology has focused on the tendency to conserve limited cognitive resources. The CRT is the predominant measure of such miserly information processing, and also predicts a number of frequently studied decision-making traits (such as belief bias and need for cognition). However, many subjects from common subject populations have already been exposed to the questions, which might add considerable noise to data. Moreove…

  • Reconciling Compensatory and Noncompensatory Strategies of Cue Weighting

    Open Access•Abigail B Sussman, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2016•Referencias: 3

    When forming a judgment about any unknown item, people must draw inferences from information that is already known. This paper examines causal relationships between cues as a relevant factor influencing how people determine the amount of weight to place on each piece of available evidence. We propose that people draw from their beliefs about specific causal relationships between cues when determining how much weight to place on those cues, and th…

  • The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard

    Open Access•Pam Mueller, Pam A Mueller et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2014

    Taking notes on laptops rather than in longhand is increasingly common. Many researchers have suggested that laptop note taking is less effective than longhand note taking for learning. Prior studies have primarily focused on students’ capacity for multitasking and distraction when using laptops. The present research suggests that even when laptops are used solely to take notes, they may still be impairing learning because their use results in sh…

  • Commentaries and Rejoinder on

    Benoît Monin, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2014•Citada por: 15•Referencias: 1

    While direct replications such as the “Many Labs” project are extremely valuable in testing the reliability of published findings across laboratories, they reflect the common reliance in psychology on single vignettes or stimuli, which limits the scope of the conclusions that can be reached. New experimental tools and statistical techniques make it easier to routinely sample stimuli, and to appropriately treat them as random factors. We encourage…

  • Latent scope bias in categorization

    Abigail B Sussman, Sangeet Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 26

  • When one model casts doubt on another

    Sangeet Khemlani, Sangeet S Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2011•Citada por: 2

    Discounting is a phenomenon in causal reasoning in which the presence of one cause casts doubt on another. We provide a survey of the descriptive and formal models that attempt to explain the discounting process and summarize what current models do not account for and where room for improvement exists. We propose a levels-of-analysis framework organized around 2 types of models of causal discounting: computational and algorithmic models. Theories…

  • Missing the trees for the forest

    Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010•Citada por: 13

    An illusion of explanatory depth (IOED) occurs when people believe they understand a concept more deeply than they actually do. To date, IOEDs have been identified only in mechanical and natural domains, occluding why they occur and suggesting that their implications are quite limited. Six studies illustrated that IOEDs occur because people adopt an inappropriately abstract construal style when they assess how well they understand concrete concep…

  • Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation

    Open Access•Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2009

    Processing fluency, or the subjective experience of ease with which people process information, reliably influences people’s judgments across a broad range of social dimensions. Experimenters have manipulated processing fluency using a vast array of techniques, which, despite their diversity, produce remarkably similar judgmental consequences. For example, people similarly judge stimuli that are semantically primed (conceptual fluency), visually …

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Citada por: 259•Referencias: 16

  • Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness

    Open Access•Mary Steffel, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2009•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 34

  • The secret life of fluency

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2008

  • Beliefs about what types of mechanisms produce random sequences

    Open Access•Deborah S Blinder, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008•Referencias: 2

    Although many researchers use Wagenaar's framework for understanding the factors that people use to determine whether a process is random, the framework has never undergone empirical scrutiny. This paper uses Wagenaar's framework as a starting point and examines the three properties of his framework—independence of events, fixed alternatives, and equiprobability. We find strong evidence to suggest that independence of events is indeed used as a c…

  • Heuristics made easy

    Anuj K Shah, Anuj Shah et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2008•Citada por: 34

    In this article, the authors propose a new framework for understanding and studying heuristics. The authors posit that heuristics primarily serve the purpose of reducing the effort associated with a task. As such, the authors propose that heuristics can be classified according to a small set of effort-reduction principles. The authors use this framework to build upon current models of heuristics, examine existing heuristics in terms of effort-red…

  • Overcoming intuition

    Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental…•2007

    Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving inform…

  • Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Applied Cognitive Psychology•2006

    Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly-complex words. However, a majority of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective. Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complexity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regard…

  • Accuracy in detecting referents of pointing gestures unaccompanied by language

    A Bangerter, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Gesture•2006•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 3

    It has been claimed that the perceptual accuracy with which people comprehend distal pointing gestures is low. But this claim is at odds with research showing that detection of other indexical signals, e.g., eye gaze, is very accurate. We conducted three experiments to assess people’s detection accuracy of targets of distal pointing gestures, using a paradigm adapted from the study of eye gaze. Pairs of people were seated next to each other. One …

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Citada por: 259•Referencias: 16

  • Heuristics made easy

    Anuj K Shah, Anuj Shah et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2008•Citada por: 34

    In this article, the authors propose a new framework for understanding and studying heuristics. The authors posit that heuristics primarily serve the purpose of reducing the effort associated with a task. As such, the authors propose that heuristics can be classified according to a small set of effort-reduction principles. The authors use this framework to build upon current models of heuristics, examine existing heuristics in terms of effort-red…

  • Commentaries and Rejoinder on

    Benoît Monin, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2014•Citada por: 15•Referencias: 1

    While direct replications such as the “Many Labs” project are extremely valuable in testing the reliability of published findings across laboratories, they reflect the common reliance in psychology on single vignettes or stimuli, which limits the scope of the conclusions that can be reached. New experimental tools and statistical techniques make it easier to routinely sample stimuli, and to appropriately treat them as random factors. We encourage…

  • Missing the trees for the forest

    Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010•Citada por: 13

    An illusion of explanatory depth (IOED) occurs when people believe they understand a concept more deeply than they actually do. To date, IOEDs have been identified only in mechanical and natural domains, occluding why they occur and suggesting that their implications are quite limited. Six studies illustrated that IOEDs occur because people adopt an inappropriately abstract construal style when they assess how well they understand concrete concep…

  • Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness

    Open Access•Mary Steffel, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2009•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 34

  • When one model casts doubt on another

    Sangeet Khemlani, Sangeet S Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2011•Citada por: 2

    Discounting is a phenomenon in causal reasoning in which the presence of one cause casts doubt on another. We provide a survey of the descriptive and formal models that attempt to explain the discounting process and summarize what current models do not account for and where room for improvement exists. We propose a levels-of-analysis framework organized around 2 types of models of causal discounting: computational and algorithmic models. Theories…

  • Accuracy in detecting referents of pointing gestures unaccompanied by language

    A Bangerter, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Gesture•2006•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 3

    It has been claimed that the perceptual accuracy with which people comprehend distal pointing gestures is low. But this claim is at odds with research showing that detection of other indexical signals, e.g., eye gaze, is very accurate. We conducted three experiments to assess people’s detection accuracy of targets of distal pointing gestures, using a paradigm adapted from the study of eye gaze. Pairs of people were seated next to each other. One …

  • Latent scope bias in categorization

    Abigail B Sussman, Sangeet Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 26

  • Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Applied Cognitive Psychology•2006

    Most texts on writing style encourage authors to avoid overly-complex words. However, a majority of undergraduates admit to deliberately increasing the complexity of their vocabulary so as to give the impression of intelligence. This paper explores the extent to which this strategy is effective. Experiments 1–3 manipulate complexity of texts and find a negative relationship between complexity and judged intelligence. This relationship held regard…

  • Accuracy in detecting referents of pointing gestures unaccompanied by language

    A Bangerter, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Gesture•2006•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 3

    It has been claimed that the perceptual accuracy with which people comprehend distal pointing gestures is low. But this claim is at odds with research showing that detection of other indexical signals, e.g., eye gaze, is very accurate. We conducted three experiments to assess people’s detection accuracy of targets of distal pointing gestures, using a paradigm adapted from the study of eye gaze. Pairs of people were seated next to each other. One …

  • Overcoming intuition

    Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental…•2007

    Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving inform…

  • The secret life of fluency

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2008

  • Beliefs about what types of mechanisms produce random sequences

    Open Access•Deborah S Blinder, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008•Referencias: 2

    Although many researchers use Wagenaar's framework for understanding the factors that people use to determine whether a process is random, the framework has never undergone empirical scrutiny. This paper uses Wagenaar's framework as a starting point and examines the three properties of his framework—independence of events, fixed alternatives, and equiprobability. We find strong evidence to suggest that independence of events is indeed used as a c…

  • Heuristics made easy

    Anuj K Shah, Anuj Shah et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2008•Citada por: 34

    In this article, the authors propose a new framework for understanding and studying heuristics. The authors posit that heuristics primarily serve the purpose of reducing the effort associated with a task. As such, the authors propose that heuristics can be classified according to a small set of effort-reduction principles. The authors use this framework to build upon current models of heuristics, examine existing heuristics in terms of effort-red…

  • Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation

    Open Access•Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Personality and Social Psychology…•2009

    Processing fluency, or the subjective experience of ease with which people process information, reliably influences people’s judgments across a broad range of social dimensions. Experimenters have manipulated processing fluency using a vast array of techniques, which, despite their diversity, produce remarkably similar judgmental consequences. For example, people similarly judge stimuli that are semantically primed (conceptual fluency), visually …

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009•Citada por: 259•Referencias: 16

  • Happy by What Standard? The Role of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Comparisons in Ratings of Happiness

    Open Access•Mary Steffel, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2009•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 34

  • Missing the trees for the forest

    Adam L Alter, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010•Citada por: 13

    An illusion of explanatory depth (IOED) occurs when people believe they understand a concept more deeply than they actually do. To date, IOEDs have been identified only in mechanical and natural domains, occluding why they occur and suggesting that their implications are quite limited. Six studies illustrated that IOEDs occur because people adopt an inappropriately abstract construal style when they assess how well they understand concrete concep…

  • When one model casts doubt on another

    Sangeet Khemlani, Sangeet S Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2011•Citada por: 2

    Discounting is a phenomenon in causal reasoning in which the presence of one cause casts doubt on another. We provide a survey of the descriptive and formal models that attempt to explain the discounting process and summarize what current models do not account for and where room for improvement exists. We propose a levels-of-analysis framework organized around 2 types of models of causal discounting: computational and algorithmic models. Theories…

  • Latent scope bias in categorization

    Abigail B Sussman, Sangeet Khemlani et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 26

  • The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard

    Open Access•Pam Mueller, Pam A Mueller et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2014

    Taking notes on laptops rather than in longhand is increasingly common. Many researchers have suggested that laptop note taking is less effective than longhand note taking for learning. Prior studies have primarily focused on students’ capacity for multitasking and distraction when using laptops. The present research suggests that even when laptops are used solely to take notes, they may still be impairing learning because their use results in sh…

  • Commentaries and Rejoinder on

    Benoît Monin, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2014•Citada por: 15•Referencias: 1

    While direct replications such as the “Many Labs” project are extremely valuable in testing the reliability of published findings across laboratories, they reflect the common reliance in psychology on single vignettes or stimuli, which limits the scope of the conclusions that can be reached. New experimental tools and statistical techniques make it easier to routinely sample stimuli, and to appropriately treat them as random factors. We encourage…

  • Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

    Open Access•Keela S Thomson, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Judgment and Decision Making•2016

    Much research in cognitive psychology has focused on the tendency to conserve limited cognitive resources. The CRT is the predominant measure of such miserly information processing, and also predicts a number of frequently studied decision-making traits (such as belief bias and need for cognition). However, many subjects from common subject populations have already been exposed to the questions, which might add considerable noise to data. Moreove…

  • Reconciling Compensatory and Noncompensatory Strategies of Cue Weighting

    Open Access•Abigail B Sussman, Daniel M Oppenheimer et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2016•Referencias: 3

    When forming a judgment about any unknown item, people must draw inferences from information that is already known. This paper examines causal relationships between cues as a relevant factor influencing how people determine the amount of weight to place on each piece of available evidence. We propose that people draw from their beliefs about specific causal relationships between cues when determining how much weight to place on those cues, and th…

  • The policy consequences of cascade blindness

    Open Access•Adam Elga, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Behavioural Public Policy•2018•Referencias: 4

    One way to reduce waste and to make a system more robust is to allow its components to pool resources. For example, banks might insure each other or share a common capital reserve. Systems whose resources have been pooled in this way are highly prevalent in such diverse domains as finance, infrastructure, health care, emergency response and engineering. However, these systems have a combination of characteristics that leave them vulnerable to poo…

  • The effect of effects on effectiveness

    Open Access•Abigail B Sussman, 邦彦 山口 et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2020

    Beliefs about how effective a cause will be at achieving possible outcomes are critical inputs into a range of decisions, from how to treat an illness to which products to purchase. We identify scope-the number of distinct outcomes a cause is known to achieve-as an important input into judgments of efficacy. We compare causes that lead to worse outcomes (i.e., banes) to those leading to improvements (i.e., boons). People believe that banes with b…

  • The “Effort Elephant” in the Room

    Open Access•Keela S Thomson, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Perspectives on Psychological…•2022

    Despite decades of research in the fields of judgment and decision-making, social psychology, cognitive psychology, human-machine interaction, behavioral economics, and neuroscience, we still do not know what “cognitive effort” is. The definitions in use are often imprecise and sometimes diametrically opposed. Researchers with different assumptions talk past each other, and many aspects of effort conservation remain untested and difficult to meas…

  • How people deal with …………………………. outliers

    Open Access•Jennifer E Dannals, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2022

    People regularly make sense of distributions that are complicated by noise. How do individuals determine whether an outlying observation should be incorporated into one's understanding of the true distribution of the population or considered a fluke that ought to be disregarded? In a simple prediction task, we examine how individuals incorporate outliers and compare their behavior to various prescriptive models (e.g., averaging and tests of disco…

  • Visual numerosity perception shows no advantage in real-world scenes compared to artificial displays

    Open Access•Darko Odic, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Cognition•2023

  • The latent scope bias

    Open Access•Sangeet Khemlani, Samuel G B Johnson et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2024

  • Assessing metacognitive knowledge in subjective decisions

    Trent N Cash, Daniel M Oppenheimer•ARTICLE•Thinking & Reasoning•2025

    Subjective, multi-attribute choice decisions – such as whom to marry or which college to attend – play a substantial role in decision makers’ long-term well-being. However, the metacognition literature lacks tools for assessing metacognitive capacities in subjective decisions. We present three studies in which we propose and validate the Knowledge of Weights (KoW) paradigm, a novel method for assessing metacognitive knowledge of attribute weights…

Psychology (19 obras) · Cognitive psychology (16 obras) · Computer Science (15 obras) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 obras) · Social Psychology (10 obras) · Artificial Intelligence (8 obras) · Cognition (7 obras) · Mathematics (7 obras) · Epistemology (6 obras) · Statistics (6 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae