Diana Delnoij
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 307342 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Diana Delnoij |
| NOMBRES | Diana |
| APELLIDO | Delnoij |
| FIRMA | DELNOIJ D |
| AFILIACIONES | Tilburg University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2066-9604 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 22 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 18 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 22 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2002 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Value-based health care in translation
In this article we examine the fragmented interpretation and implementation of a remarkably popular concept, value-based health care (VBHC). By building on a case study of a project team working on the development of value-based primary care services for elderly patients, we shed new light on the way in which VBHC transitions from theory to practice. The concept of 'translation' is used to theoretically frame our analysis. Between June 2021 and M…
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
Introduction: Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the …
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general populatio…
Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability
In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA r…
Questions regarding 'epistemic injustice' in knowledge-intensive policymaking
Defining clinically relevant quality indicators that matter to people with Down syndrome
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)
Healthcare quality for people with Down Syndrome
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)
Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures
Asking what matters
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to establish the value of health care. In order to reflect value, PROMs should measure outcomes that matter to patients. However, patients are not always involved in the development of PROMs. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether PROMs, which were developed without patient involvement, are relevant to patients and whether the level of importance allocated towa…
Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients
BACKGROUND: Various north-western European health-care systems encourage patients to make an active choice of health-care provider. This study explores, qualitatively, patients' hospital selection processes and provides insight into the reasons why patients do or do not make active choices. METHODS: Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 142 patients in two departments of three Dutch hospitals. Interviews were recorded, transcr…
Patient-centered outcomes on quality of life and anthroposophic healthcare
The Net Promoter Score – an asset to patient experience surveys
BACKGROUND: In the search for more straightforward ways of summarizing patient experiences and satisfaction, there is growing interest in the Net Promoter Score (NPS): How likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague? OBJECTIVE: To assess what the NPS adds to patient experience surveys. The NPS was tested against three other constructs already used in current surveys to summarize patient experiences and satisfaction:…
Stronger, but not (yet) an equal. The use of quality improvement instruments and strategies by patient organisations in the Netherlands
The value of cognitive interviewing for optimizing a patient experience survey
This mixed-methods study uses both cognitive interviewing and a quantitative field test to provide empirical evidence on the value of cognitive interviewing for questionnaire development. Ten interviews were conducted with a questionnaire on patient experiences with cataract surgery (75-item consumer quality index cataract), using both thinking-aloud and probing techniques. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, problems were coded wi…
Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care
Background Public reports about health‐care quality have not been effectively used by consumers thus far. A possible explanation is inadequate presentation of the information. Objective To assess which presentation features contribute to consumers’ correct interpretation and effective use of comparative health‐care quality information and to examine the influence of consumer characteristics. Design Fictitious Consumer Quality Index (CQI) data on …
Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups
Background Patient‐given global ratings are frequently interpreted as summary measures of the patient perspective, with limited understanding of what these ratings summarize. Global ratings may be determined by patient experiences on priority aspects of care. Objectives (i) identify patient priorities regarding elements of care for breast cancer, hip‐ or knee surgery, cataract surgery, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, (ii) establish whether exp…
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews
Several barriers to an effective use of comparative healthcare information were identified, such as too much information and the ambiguity of terms presented on websites. Particularly important for future research is the question of how comparative healthcare information can be integrated with alternative information, such as patient reviews on the Internet. Furthermore, the readability of quality of care concepts is an issue that needs further a…
Using Multilevel Modeling to Assess Case-Mix Adjusters in Consumer Experience Surveys in Health Care
BACKGROUND: Ratings on the quality of healthcare from the consumer's perspective need to be adjusted for consumer characteristics to ensure fair and accurate comparisons between healthcare providers or health plans. Although multilevel analysis is already considered an appropriate method for analyzing healthcare performance data, it has rarely been used to assess case-mix adjustment of such data. The purpose of this article is to investigate whet…
New directions in European public health research
Public health draws from a range of academic disciplines, social, medical and statistical, and answers questions relevant to improving the health of populations. We have initiated a Europe-wide study, Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe, to assess the development and use of public health research in both public policy and local decision making. The contemporary challenge for public health research is to integrate the capabilities of di…
Linking up with the community
The results indicate that a considerable number of collaborative initiatives have emerged. Still, these initiatives are loosely 'community-based' and hardly focus on the full integration of care services. This suggests that the community linkages of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam could be further developed by gaining the full support of all clinical departments for the strategic approach and by adapting an overall hospital perspective t…
Health system outcomes and determinants amenable to public health in industrialized countries
Mortality and premature deaths could be improved by focusing on factors that are amenable to public health policies. Tackling these issues should be reflected in the ongoing assessments of health system performance
Integrated care in an international perspective
DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone
Questions regarding 'epistemic injustice' in knowledge-intensive policymaking
The value of cognitive interviewing for optimizing a patient experience survey
This mixed-methods study uses both cognitive interviewing and a quantitative field test to provide empirical evidence on the value of cognitive interviewing for questionnaire development. Ten interviews were conducted with a questionnaire on patient experiences with cataract surgery (75-item consumer quality index cataract), using both thinking-aloud and probing techniques. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, problems were coded wi…
Integrated care in an international perspective
DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone
Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability
In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA r…
New directions in European public health research
Public health draws from a range of academic disciplines, social, medical and statistical, and answers questions relevant to improving the health of populations. We have initiated a Europe-wide study, Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe, to assess the development and use of public health research in both public policy and local decision making. The contemporary challenge for public health research is to integrate the capabilities of di…
Integrated care in an international perspective
DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone
Health system outcomes and determinants amenable to public health in industrialized countries
Mortality and premature deaths could be improved by focusing on factors that are amenable to public health policies. Tackling these issues should be reflected in the ongoing assessments of health system performance
Linking up with the community
The results indicate that a considerable number of collaborative initiatives have emerged. Still, these initiatives are loosely 'community-based' and hardly focus on the full integration of care services. This suggests that the community linkages of the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam could be further developed by gaining the full support of all clinical departments for the strategic approach and by adapting an overall hospital perspective t…
New directions in European public health research
Public health draws from a range of academic disciplines, social, medical and statistical, and answers questions relevant to improving the health of populations. We have initiated a Europe-wide study, Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe, to assess the development and use of public health research in both public policy and local decision making. The contemporary challenge for public health research is to integrate the capabilities of di…
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews
Several barriers to an effective use of comparative healthcare information were identified, such as too much information and the ambiguity of terms presented on websites. Particularly important for future research is the question of how comparative healthcare information can be integrated with alternative information, such as patient reviews on the Internet. Furthermore, the readability of quality of care concepts is an issue that needs further a…
Using Multilevel Modeling to Assess Case-Mix Adjusters in Consumer Experience Surveys in Health Care
BACKGROUND: Ratings on the quality of healthcare from the consumer's perspective need to be adjusted for consumer characteristics to ensure fair and accurate comparisons between healthcare providers or health plans. Although multilevel analysis is already considered an appropriate method for analyzing healthcare performance data, it has rarely been used to assess case-mix adjustment of such data. The purpose of this article is to investigate whet…
Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups
Background Patient‐given global ratings are frequently interpreted as summary measures of the patient perspective, with limited understanding of what these ratings summarize. Global ratings may be determined by patient experiences on priority aspects of care. Objectives (i) identify patient priorities regarding elements of care for breast cancer, hip‐ or knee surgery, cataract surgery, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes, (ii) establish whether exp…
Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care
Background Public reports about health‐care quality have not been effectively used by consumers thus far. A possible explanation is inadequate presentation of the information. Objective To assess which presentation features contribute to consumers’ correct interpretation and effective use of comparative health‐care quality information and to examine the influence of consumer characteristics. Design Fictitious Consumer Quality Index (CQI) data on …
The value of cognitive interviewing for optimizing a patient experience survey
This mixed-methods study uses both cognitive interviewing and a quantitative field test to provide empirical evidence on the value of cognitive interviewing for questionnaire development. Ten interviews were conducted with a questionnaire on patient experiences with cataract surgery (75-item consumer quality index cataract), using both thinking-aloud and probing techniques. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, problems were coded wi…
Stronger, but not (yet) an equal. The use of quality improvement instruments and strategies by patient organisations in the Netherlands
The Net Promoter Score – an asset to patient experience surveys
BACKGROUND: In the search for more straightforward ways of summarizing patient experiences and satisfaction, there is growing interest in the Net Promoter Score (NPS): How likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague? OBJECTIVE: To assess what the NPS adds to patient experience surveys. The NPS was tested against three other constructs already used in current surveys to summarize patient experiences and satisfaction:…
Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients
BACKGROUND: Various north-western European health-care systems encourage patients to make an active choice of health-care provider. This study explores, qualitatively, patients' hospital selection processes and provides insight into the reasons why patients do or do not make active choices. METHODS: Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 142 patients in two departments of three Dutch hospitals. Interviews were recorded, transcr…
Patient-centered outcomes on quality of life and anthroposophic healthcare
Patient involvement in the development of patient‐reported outcome measures
Asking what matters
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to establish the value of health care. In order to reflect value, PROMs should measure outcomes that matter to patients. However, patients are not always involved in the development of PROMs. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether PROMs, which were developed without patient involvement, are relevant to patients and whether the level of importance allocated towa…
Healthcare quality for people with Down Syndrome
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)
Defining clinically relevant quality indicators that matter to people with Down syndrome
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)
Questions regarding 'epistemic injustice' in knowledge-intensive policymaking
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries
Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general populatio…
Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability
In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA r…
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
Introduction: Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the …
Value-based health care in translation
In this article we examine the fragmented interpretation and implementation of a remarkably popular concept, value-based health care (VBHC). By building on a case study of a project team working on the development of value-based primary care services for elderly patients, we shed new light on the way in which VBHC transitions from theory to practice. The concept of 'translation' is used to theoretically frame our analysis. Between June 2021 and M…
Health care (18 obras) · Medicine (16 obras) · Nursing (11 obras) · Political science (11 obras) · Computer Science (9 obras) · Psychology (9 obras) · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 obras) · Public relations (8 obras) · Public health (7 obras) · Family medicine (6 obras)