Elliot Noma

Datos Biográficos

ID311554
NOMBREElliot Noma
NOMBRESElliot
APELLIDONoma
FIRMANOMA E
AFILIACIONESRutgers, the State University of New Jersey
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS5
TOTAL DE CITAS5
TOTAL COMO AUTOR5
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1984
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN1985
ÍNDICE H2

  • Scaling Sociomatrices by Optimizing an Explicit Function: Correspondence Analysis of Binary Single Response Sociomatrices

    Elliot Noma, D Randall SmithARTICLEMultivariate Behavioral Research1985

    Most methods for detecting structure in sociometric data involve either continuous spatial representations (e.g. MDS) or discrete hierarchical clustering analysis (e.g. CONCOR). By producing either spatial or clustering representations, these methods can highlight only some of the theoretically interesting group structures. Correspondence analysis, in contrast, can provide either spatial or clustering representations by assigning spatial coordina…

  • Benchmark for the blocking of sociometric data

    Elliot Noma, D Randall SmithARTICLEPsychological Bulletin1985

  • Benchmark for the blocking of sociometric data

    Elliot Noma, D Randall SmithARTICLEPsychological Bulletin1985Citada por: 2

  • Scaling Labor Markets: An Approach to Segmentation Research

    Open AccessD Randall Smith, Elliot NomaARTICLESociological Perspectives1985Referencias: 25

    Theoretical analyses of labor market segmentation have traditionally emphasized discrete aspects of this structure (e.g., primary and secondary markets). In contrast, the literature on the segmentation of firms and industries has moved from discrete, unidimensional views of economic sectors (e.g., core or periphery) to continuous, multidimensional conceptualizations. Following this shift, we argue that labor market segments should also be seen as…

  • Delinquent Career-Lines: A Conceptual Link Between Theory and Juvenile Offenses

    Open AccessD Randall Smith, William R Smith et al.ARTICLESociological Quarterly1984Citada por: 3Referencias: 24

    Theories of delinquent behavior have failed to adequately explain the seeming lack of specialization or development in the delinquent careers of chronic offenders. The extent to which delinquents specialize in their criminal careers is unclear because of inadequacies in two related areas: the offense typologies or classifications used and the failure to consider in the analysis the entire sequence of crimes. It is argued that both of these areas …