Anne M Stiggelbout
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 326809 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Anne M Stiggelbout |
| NOMBRES | Anne M |
| APELLIDO | Stiggelbout |
| FIRMA | STIGGELBOUT A M |
| AFILIACIONES | Leiden University Medical Center |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6293-4509 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 32 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 32 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1994 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
“Timelining” Treatment Trajectories During Interviews About Shared Decision Making With Ethnic Minorities in Oncology
The use of timelines is well-established in qualitative research and has been employed across a range of studies. However, the development of timelines (timelining) during interviews on shared decision making (SDM) remains relatively uncommon. This article reflects on our experiences with integrating timelining into semi-structured interviews with ethnic minority patients and their relatives on SDM in oncology. During the interviews, the intervie…
Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment
The value of using patient‐reported outcomes for health screening during long‐term follow‐up after paediatric stem cell transplantation for nonmalignant diseases
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) within comprehensive care follow-up programmes, specifically focused on health screening, remains largely unexplored. PROs were implemented in our late effects and comprehensive care programme after paediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for nonmalignant diseases. The programme focuses solely on screening of physical and mental health and on discussing PROs …
Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient
Differing Professional Perspectives on the Interprofessional Collaboration in IPUs
In VBHC, there seems to be a lack of common perception of an IPU's composition and a failure to always achieve high quality interprofessional collaboration. Given the importance of interprofessional collaboration in VBHC, effort should be invested in achieving a shared understanding and improved collaboration
Differing professional perspectives on the integration of care in Integrated Practice Units
Introduction: An important component of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) is providing the full cycle of care for a specific medical condition in an Integrated Practice Unit (IPU). Although this requires employees from diverse professional backgrounds to interact, there is limited knowledge on how professionals perceive such interprofessional collaboration. Research shows that organising the delivery of integrated care can be challenging, in part due…
Psychometric evaluation of the Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS-13)
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, dimensionality and validity of the self-report questionnaire Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS-13) in a sample of the general population and a patient population. METHODS: = 486) was recruited from the population of knee and hip osteoarthritis patients aged 45 and over, also from the Netherlands. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, average inter-item correlation and item…
Perspectives of people living with Parkinson's disease on personalized prediction models
BACKGROUND: There is a great need for the development of personalized prediction models (PPMs) that can predict the rate of disease progression for persons with Parkinson's disease (PD), based on their individual characteristics. In this study, we aimed to clarify the perspective of persons diagnosed with PD on the value of such hypothetical PPMs. METHODS: We organized four focus group discussions, each including five persons with PD who were dia…
Towards Culturally Sensitive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology A Study Protocol Integrating Bioethical Qualitative Research on Shared Decision-Making Among Ethnic Minorities With Ethical Reflection
Background Shared decision-making (SDM) is often considered the ideal for decision-making in oncology. Views of specific groups such as ethnic minorities have seldom been considered in its development. Aim In this study we seek to assess in oncology if there is a need for adaptation of the current SDM model to ethnic minorities and to formulate possible adjustments. Design This study is embedded in empirical bioethics, an interdisciplinary approa…
Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities for Shared Decision Making in Postgraduate Medical Education
PURPOSE: Although shared decision making (SDM) is considered the preferred approach in medical decision making, it is currently not routinely used in clinical practice. To bridge the transfer gap between SDM training and application, the authors aimed to reach consensus on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for SDM and associated behavioral indicators as a framework to support self-directed learning during postgraduate medical education. …
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
Measuring shared decision making in oncology
Uncertainty related to multigene panel testing for cancer
Multigene panel testing is mainly used to improve identification of genetic causes in families with characteristics fitting multiple possible cancer syndromes. This technique may yield uncertainty, for example when variants of unknown significance are identified. This study explores counsellors' and counselees' experiences with uncertainty, and how they discuss uncertainties and decide about multigene panel testing. Six focus groups were conducte…
Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care
To reach SDM in daily practice, physicians should create awareness of all treatment options, including forgoing treatment, and communicate the risk of benefit and harm. Open and honest communication is needed in which patients' expectations and concerns are discussed. Through this, the difficult process of decision making in the last phase of life can be facilitated and the focus on the best care for the specific patient is strengthened
Shared decision making
Women's experiences with information provision and deciding about fertility preservation in the Netherlands
OBJECTIVE: It is not well-known how women receiving counselling consultation about fertility preservation (FP) in the Netherlands perceive the information provision about and referral for FP in the oncology setting. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore women's experiences with the (process of) information provision about the gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment and about FP and the decision-making process and to obtain their reco…
Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check
Underserved populations can be reached by a low-cost culturally adapted postal approach with a reminder and follow-up telephone calls. The added value of the more expensive face-to-face invitation was negligible. PC participation rates were acceptable. Efforts should be particularly targeted at practices in the most deprived areas
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer
We found a very satisfactory scale for bowel problems, in patients both with and without stoma. The body image and urinary incontinence scales were reliable, and construct validity was sufficient. We suggest the questionnaire to be adapted to decrease the number of individual items, improve the scales, and therefore increase reliability of the entire questionnaire
Do individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why
Since the general population values depression less negatively, using their perspective might result in less effectiveness for interventions for mild depression. Perceptions of depression or to individual characteristics did not seem to differentially affect valuations made by either individuals with or without depression
Validation of a Dutch Version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS) in Three Populations of Women
We investigated the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS). Questionnaires (N = 515) were administered to 90 women with breast cancer, 227 women with fertility problems, and 198 healthy controls. Principal axis factor analysis suggested a one-factor structure with 11 items (breast cancer patients R(2) =.48, α =.87, ICC =.95; women with fertility problems R(2) =.45, α =.89, ICC =.86). Women with fertili…
Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology
Theory-informed design of values clarification methods
Shared decision making
Although many clinicians feel they already use shared decision making, research shows a perception-reality gap. A M Stiggelbout and colleagues discuss why it is important and highlight some best practices.
Focusing illusion, adaptation and EQ‐5D health state descriptions
Background Patients tend to assign higher utilities to health states compared with the general public. Several explanations have been given for this difference including focusing illusion ‐, caused in part by the sparseness of a health state description such as the EQ‐5D ‐, and adaptation. Objective We investigated whether patients and the public differ in which dimensions they find important. Furthermore, we compared whether the dimensions named…
Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences
Background Adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) is an individually tailored preferences elicitation technique that mimics actual decision‐making processes by asking participants to make trade‐offs between the various dimensions that underlie decision problems. ACA is increasingly applied in patient preferences assessments but formal evaluation of its validity and reliability is lacking. Objective To investigate ACA’s validity and reliability in elici…
Choices in oncology
The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment
Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
Cost Measurement in Economic Evaluations of Health Care
PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were 1) to investigate the feasibility of using providers' administrative systems for the assessment of healthcare utilization in economic evaluations performed alongside multicenter studies, 2) to assess the convergent validity of patients' and providers' reports of care, and 3) to investigate whether differences between providers' and patients' reports are related to age, gender, health, recall period, and v…
Missing forms and dropout in the TME quality of life substudy
Understanding VAS Valuations
Individual quality of life
In the schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL) the weights for five individualized quality of life domains have been derived by judgment analysis and direct weighting (DW). We studied the feasibility and validity of adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) as an alternative method to derive weights in 27 cancer patients and 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Further, we assessed the convergence between direct weights and we…
Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences
Background Adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) is an individually tailored preferences elicitation technique that mimics actual decision‐making processes by asking participants to make trade‐offs between the various dimensions that underlie decision problems. ACA is increasingly applied in patient preferences assessments but formal evaluation of its validity and reliability is lacking. Objective To investigate ACA’s validity and reliability in elici…
Shared decision making
Although many clinicians feel they already use shared decision making, research shows a perception-reality gap. A M Stiggelbout and colleagues discuss why it is important and highlight some best practices.
Focusing illusion, adaptation and EQ‐5D health state descriptions
Background Patients tend to assign higher utilities to health states compared with the general public. Several explanations have been given for this difference including focusing illusion ‐, caused in part by the sparseness of a health state description such as the EQ‐5D ‐, and adaptation. Objective We investigated whether patients and the public differ in which dimensions they find important. Furthermore, we compared whether the dimensions named…
Theory-informed design of values clarification methods
Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology
Shared decision making
Women's experiences with information provision and deciding about fertility preservation in the Netherlands
OBJECTIVE: It is not well-known how women receiving counselling consultation about fertility preservation (FP) in the Netherlands perceive the information provision about and referral for FP in the oncology setting. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore women's experiences with the (process of) information provision about the gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment and about FP and the decision-making process and to obtain their reco…
Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check
Underserved populations can be reached by a low-cost culturally adapted postal approach with a reminder and follow-up telephone calls. The added value of the more expensive face-to-face invitation was negligible. PC participation rates were acceptable. Efforts should be particularly targeted at practices in the most deprived areas
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer
We found a very satisfactory scale for bowel problems, in patients both with and without stoma. The body image and urinary incontinence scales were reliable, and construct validity was sufficient. We suggest the questionnaire to be adapted to decrease the number of individual items, improve the scales, and therefore increase reliability of the entire questionnaire
Do individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why
Since the general population values depression less negatively, using their perspective might result in less effectiveness for interventions for mild depression. Perceptions of depression or to individual characteristics did not seem to differentially affect valuations made by either individuals with or without depression
Validation of a Dutch Version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS) in Three Populations of Women
We investigated the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS). Questionnaires (N = 515) were administered to 90 women with breast cancer, 227 women with fertility problems, and 198 healthy controls. Principal axis factor analysis suggested a one-factor structure with 11 items (breast cancer patients R(2) =.48, α =.87, ICC =.95; women with fertility problems R(2) =.45, α =.89, ICC =.86). Women with fertili…
Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care
To reach SDM in daily practice, physicians should create awareness of all treatment options, including forgoing treatment, and communicate the risk of benefit and harm. Open and honest communication is needed in which patients' expectations and concerns are discussed. Through this, the difficult process of decision making in the last phase of life can be facilitated and the focus on the best care for the specific patient is strengthened
Uncertainty related to multigene panel testing for cancer
Multigene panel testing is mainly used to improve identification of genetic causes in families with characteristics fitting multiple possible cancer syndromes. This technique may yield uncertainty, for example when variants of unknown significance are identified. This study explores counsellors' and counselees' experiences with uncertainty, and how they discuss uncertainties and decide about multigene panel testing. Six focus groups were conducte…
Measuring shared decision making in oncology
Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities for Shared Decision Making in Postgraduate Medical Education
PURPOSE: Although shared decision making (SDM) is considered the preferred approach in medical decision making, it is currently not routinely used in clinical practice. To bridge the transfer gap between SDM training and application, the authors aimed to reach consensus on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for SDM and associated behavioral indicators as a framework to support self-directed learning during postgraduate medical education. …
A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty
Psychometric evaluation of the Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS-13)
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, dimensionality and validity of the self-report questionnaire Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS-13) in a sample of the general population and a patient population. METHODS: = 486) was recruited from the population of knee and hip osteoarthritis patients aged 45 and over, also from the Netherlands. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, average inter-item correlation and item…
Perspectives of people living with Parkinson's disease on personalized prediction models
BACKGROUND: There is a great need for the development of personalized prediction models (PPMs) that can predict the rate of disease progression for persons with Parkinson's disease (PD), based on their individual characteristics. In this study, we aimed to clarify the perspective of persons diagnosed with PD on the value of such hypothetical PPMs. METHODS: We organized four focus group discussions, each including five persons with PD who were dia…
Medicine (26 obras) · Psychology (20 obras) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (13 obras) · Computer Science (12 obras) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 obras) · Internal Medicine (10 obras) · Nursing (10 obras) · Clinical Psychology (8 obras) · Medical education (8 obras) · Public health (8 obras)