Calvin Isch
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 343302 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Calvin Isch |
| NOMBRES | Calvin |
| APELLIDO | Isch |
| FIRMA | ISCH C |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Pennsylvania |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1669-0918 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 2 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2023 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Experimental Evidence that Social Learning in Structured Information-Sharing Networks Corrects Anchoring Bias
The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which exposure to arbitrary initial values disproportionately influences estimates. While this effect has been widely documented, its role in social contexts remains unclear. Laboratory studies of isolated individuals often show stronger anchoring effects than naturalistic settings where people interact in social networks. We propose that social networks can amplify or attenuate anchoring depending on w…
Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries
There is much enthusiasm, in principle, for adversarial collaborations (ACs), a scientific conflict resolution technique that encourages investigators with clashing models to collaborate in designing studies that test competing predictions. Adversarial collaborations offer the promise of breaking deadlocked debates, resolving disputes, and providing a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of a research domain. In practice, however, adversarial…
Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks
Identities as predictors of vaccine hesitancy during the Covid‐19 pandemic
Vaccine hesitancy is variable across individuals and contexts. Theoretical work suggests that group membership should differentially affect attitudes and behavior related to COVID‐19 vaccines, as individuals draw on their identities and experiences relevant to their social groups to deal with uncertainty concerning the vaccines. The present work uses longitudinal survey data to explore how identity predicted vaccination attitudes in the U.S. befo…
Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries
There is much enthusiasm, in principle, for adversarial collaborations (ACs), a scientific conflict resolution technique that encourages investigators with clashing models to collaborate in designing studies that test competing predictions. Adversarial collaborations offer the promise of breaking deadlocked debates, resolving disputes, and providing a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of a research domain. In practice, however, adversarial…
Identities as predictors of vaccine hesitancy during the Covid‐19 pandemic
Vaccine hesitancy is variable across individuals and contexts. Theoretical work suggests that group membership should differentially affect attitudes and behavior related to COVID‐19 vaccines, as individuals draw on their identities and experiences relevant to their social groups to deal with uncertainty concerning the vaccines. The present work uses longitudinal survey data to explore how identity predicted vaccination attitudes in the U.S. befo…
Identities as predictors of vaccine hesitancy during the Covid‐19 pandemic
Vaccine hesitancy is variable across individuals and contexts. Theoretical work suggests that group membership should differentially affect attitudes and behavior related to COVID‐19 vaccines, as individuals draw on their identities and experiences relevant to their social groups to deal with uncertainty concerning the vaccines. The present work uses longitudinal survey data to explore how identity predicted vaccination attitudes in the U.S. befo…
Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks
Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries
There is much enthusiasm, in principle, for adversarial collaborations (ACs), a scientific conflict resolution technique that encourages investigators with clashing models to collaborate in designing studies that test competing predictions. Adversarial collaborations offer the promise of breaking deadlocked debates, resolving disputes, and providing a deeper, more comprehensive understanding of a research domain. In practice, however, adversarial…
Experimental Evidence that Social Learning in Structured Information-Sharing Networks Corrects Anchoring Bias
The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which exposure to arbitrary initial values disproportionately influences estimates. While this effect has been widely documented, its role in social contexts remains unclear. Laboratory studies of isolated individuals often show stronger anchoring effects than naturalistic settings where people interact in social networks. We propose that social networks can amplify or attenuate anchoring depending on w…
Political science (3 obras) · Law (2 obras) · Medicine (2 obras) · Adversarial system (1 obras) · Advertising (1 obras) · Anchoring (1 obras) · Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 obras) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 obras) · Biology and political orientation (1 obras) · Business (1 obras)