Peter Jüni
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 3467116 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Peter Jüni |
| NOMBRES | Peter |
| APELLIDO | Jüni |
| FIRMA | JÜNI P |
| AFILIACIONES | St. Michael's Hospital |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5985-0670 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 1 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2011 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Gendered Paths To Cancer Knowledge and Screening Behavior among Black Adults
Efforts are needed to promote cancer knowledge and the uptake of cancer screening behaviors among Black Americans. Such efforts must be customized for the unique differences in facilitators/barriers among Black men and women. The present study leverages the potential of the UF Health Cancer Institute Community-Partnered Cancer Disparities Research Collaborative (CDRC) to identify the psychosocial and structural factors associated with cancer know…
Seroprevalence of Sars-CoV-2 antibodies among children receiving primary care in Toronto, Ontario
Effect of Free Medicine Distribution on Health Care Costs in Canada Over 3 Years
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744963
Design details for overdose education and take‐home naloxone kits
The codesign process was deliberately structured to involve community members (the public), with multiple opportunities for public contribution. In addition, patient/public participation was a principle for the management and structuring of the research team
Public health preventive measures and child health behaviours during Covid-19
Public health preventive measures during COVID-19 were associated with a negative impact on the health behaviours of Canadian children living in a large metropolitan area
Whole milk compared with reduced-fat milk and childhood overweight
RoB 2
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.
ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
The current background information and detailed discussion of the data can be found in ESC CardioMed - Section 44 Systemic hypertension ... ... Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily pr…
Robins-I
Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that d…
Long-Term Comparison of Everolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Among patients with ACS, the unrestricted use of EES is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with SES during long-term follow-up to 3 years. Notably, the risk of stent thrombosis was lower among EES-treated ACS patients.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
Long-Term Comparison of Everolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Among patients with ACS, the unrestricted use of EES is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with SES during long-term follow-up to 3 years. Notably, the risk of stent thrombosis was lower among EES-treated ACS patients.
Robins-I
Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that d…
ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
The current background information and detailed discussion of the data can be found in ESC CardioMed - Section 44 Systemic hypertension ... ... Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily pr…
RoB 2
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.
Whole milk compared with reduced-fat milk and childhood overweight
Public health preventive measures and child health behaviours during Covid-19
Public health preventive measures during COVID-19 were associated with a negative impact on the health behaviours of Canadian children living in a large metropolitan area
Design details for overdose education and take‐home naloxone kits
The codesign process was deliberately structured to involve community members (the public), with multiple opportunities for public contribution. In addition, patient/public participation was a principle for the management and structuring of the research team
Effect of Free Medicine Distribution on Health Care Costs in Canada Over 3 Years
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744963
Seroprevalence of Sars-CoV-2 antibodies among children receiving primary care in Toronto, Ontario
Gendered Paths To Cancer Knowledge and Screening Behavior among Black Adults
Efforts are needed to promote cancer knowledge and the uptake of cancer screening behaviors among Black Americans. Such efforts must be customized for the unique differences in facilitators/barriers among Black men and women. The present study leverages the potential of the UF Health Cancer Institute Community-Partnered Cancer Disparities Research Collaborative (CDRC) to identify the psychosocial and structural factors associated with cancer know…
Medicine (7 obras) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 obras) · Computer Science (3 obras) · Environmental health (3 obras) · Family medicine (3 obras) · MEDLINE (3 obras) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 obras) · Nursing (3 obras) · Psychological intervention (3 obras) · Randomized controlled trial (3 obras)