Jeff Richardson
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 3624765 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Jeff Richardson |
| NOMBRES | Jeff |
| APELLIDO | Richardson |
| FIRMA | RICHARDSON J |
| AFILIACIONES | Monash University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4248-4280 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 26 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 144 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 26 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1986 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2019 |
| ÍNDICE H | 7 |
Is the Validity of Cost Utility Analysis Improved When Utility is Measured by an Instrument with 'Home-Country' Weights? Evidence from Six Western Countries
Variation in the apparent importance of health-related problems with the instrument used to measure patient welfare
The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing
This study has shown that psychosocial dimensions of HRQoL have the greatest ability to capture the impact of depression when compared with dimensions of capability wellbeing and SWB. Some MAUIs, such as the AQoL-8D, are sensitive to most distinguishing dimensions of HRQoL and wellbeing, which may obviate the need for supplementary wellbeing instruments
Empirical Comparison Between Capability and Two Health-Related Quality of Life Measures
Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data
Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities
Reconciliation of inconsistent utilities produced by different instruments must focus primarily upon the content of the descriptive system. Utility weights primarily determine the measurement scale. Other differences, attributable to utility formula, are comparatively unimportant
Modelling utility weights for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D
Maximising health versus sharing
The Relevance of Personal Characteristics in Health Care Rationing
This article examines the preferences of the general public in Australia regarding health care resource allocation. While previous studies have revealed that the public is willing to give priority to particular groups of patients based on their personal characteristics, the present article goes beyond previous efforts in attempting to explain these results. In the present study, there was strong support among respondents for giving “equal priorit…
Health Care Decision‐Making ‐ A Focus Group Study Involving Health Professionals and the General Public
Faced with an ageing population and newspaper warnings that escalating costs are leading to a health crisis, debate has intensified in Australia and elsewhere on the allocation of limited health resources. But whose values should inform decision‐making in the health area, and should the influence of different groups vary with the level of decision‐making? These questions were put to 54 members of the public and health professionals in eight focus…
Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)
Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory
Response to “on the relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities
The moral relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities
The Rule of Rescue
The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments
As part of the validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument comparisons were made between five multiattribute utility (MAU) instruments, each purporting to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). These were the AQoL, the Canadian Health Utilities Index (HUI) 3, the Finnish 15D, the EQ-5D (formerly the EuroQoL) and the SF6D (derived from the SF-36). The paper compares absolute utility scores, instrument sensitivity, an…
Improving Value Measurement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Before cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can fulfill its promise as a tool to guide health care allocation decisions, the method of incorporating societal values into CEA may need to be improved. DESIGN: The study design was a declarative exposition of potential fallacies in the theoretical underpinnings of CEA. Two values held by many people-preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients and preferences to avoid discriminati…
Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health
Paul Menzel, Marthe R. Gold, Erik Nord, Jose-Louis Pinto-Prades, Jeff Richardson, Peter Ubel, Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health, The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 29, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1999), pp. 7-15
The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument
Production gains from health care
Cost-Effectiveness of the Primary Prevention of Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a chronic disease, with increasing prevalence widely reported. NIDDM is associated with high rates of morbidity and premature mortality and is the cause of high health service use. There is clinical, epidemiological and scientific evidence that NIDDM is potentially preventable through weight loss, enhanced fitness and nutrition modification. The research question addressed in this article is whet…
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
Cost utility analysis
A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia
The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
Cost utility analysis
The Rule of Rescue
The moral relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities
Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory
A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia
Production gains from health care
Maximising health versus sharing
Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)
Is the Validity of Cost Utility Analysis Improved When Utility is Measured by an Instrument with 'Home-Country' Weights? Evidence from Six Western Countries
Technology Assessment in Medicine
A large part of the increasing cost of health care services is often attributed to the introduction of new technology. While a review of the literature reveals that the evidence to support this view is ambiguous, it does indicate that the unregulated market fails to discriminate well between effective and ineffective health care technology. In some cases it has permitted the proliferation of medically harmful technology. At present Australia does…
A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia
Cost utility analysis
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism
Cost-Effectiveness of the Primary Prevention of Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a chronic disease, with increasing prevalence widely reported. NIDDM is associated with high rates of morbidity and premature mortality and is the cause of high health service use. There is clinical, epidemiological and scientific evidence that NIDDM is potentially preventable through weight loss, enhanced fitness and nutrition modification. The research question addressed in this article is whet…
Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health
Paul Menzel, Marthe R. Gold, Erik Nord, Jose-Louis Pinto-Prades, Jeff Richardson, Peter Ubel, Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health, The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 29, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1999), pp. 7-15
The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument
Production gains from health care
Improving Value Measurement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Before cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can fulfill its promise as a tool to guide health care allocation decisions, the method of incorporating societal values into CEA may need to be improved. DESIGN: The study design was a declarative exposition of potential fallacies in the theoretical underpinnings of CEA. Two values held by many people-preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients and preferences to avoid discriminati…
A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments
As part of the validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument comparisons were made between five multiattribute utility (MAU) instruments, each purporting to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL). These were the AQoL, the Canadian Health Utilities Index (HUI) 3, the Finnish 15D, the EQ-5D (formerly the EuroQoL) and the SF6D (derived from the SF-36). The paper compares absolute utility scores, instrument sensitivity, an…
The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation
The moral relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities
The Rule of Rescue
Response to “on the relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities
Empiricism, ethics and orthodox economic theory
Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)
Health Care Decision‐Making ‐ A Focus Group Study Involving Health Professionals and the General Public
Faced with an ageing population and newspaper warnings that escalating costs are leading to a health crisis, debate has intensified in Australia and elsewhere on the allocation of limited health resources. But whose values should inform decision‐making in the health area, and should the influence of different groups vary with the level of decision‐making? These questions were put to 54 members of the public and health professionals in eight focus…
The Relevance of Personal Characteristics in Health Care Rationing
This article examines the preferences of the general public in Australia regarding health care resource allocation. While previous studies have revealed that the public is willing to give priority to particular groups of patients based on their personal characteristics, the present article goes beyond previous efforts in attempting to explain these results. In the present study, there was strong support among respondents for giving “equal priorit…
Maximising health versus sharing
Modelling utility weights for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D
Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities
Reconciliation of inconsistent utilities produced by different instruments must focus primarily upon the content of the descriptive system. Utility weights primarily determine the measurement scale. Other differences, attributable to utility formula, are comparatively unimportant
Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data
Empirical Comparison Between Capability and Two Health-Related Quality of Life Measures
Variation in the apparent importance of health-related problems with the instrument used to measure patient welfare
The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing
This study has shown that psychosocial dimensions of HRQoL have the greatest ability to capture the impact of depression when compared with dimensions of capability wellbeing and SWB. Some MAUIs, such as the AQoL-8D, are sensitive to most distinguishing dimensions of HRQoL and wellbeing, which may obviate the need for supplementary wellbeing instruments
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (22 obras) · Medicine (17 obras) · Psychology (16 obras) · Economics (15 obras) · Healthcare Policy and Management (15 obras) · Political science (12 obras) · Nursing (11 obras) · Public health (11 obras) · Computer Science (9 obras) · Health care (9 obras)