Chaoju Tang
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 3845196 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Chaoju Tang |
| NOMBRES | Chaoju |
| APELLIDO | Tang |
| FIRMA | TANG C |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China |
| ORCID | 0009-0001-5181-3322 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 6 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 28 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2007 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Chinese “Dialects” and European “Languages
In this article, we tested some specific claims made in the literature on relative distances among European languages and among Chinese dialects, suggesting that some language varieties within the Sinitic family traditionally called dialects are, in fact, more linguistically distant from one another than some European varieties that are traditionally called languages. More generally, we examined whether distances among varieties within and across…
Is Swedish more beautiful than Danish? Matched guise investigations with unknown languages
Are some languages universally seen as beautiful? And if so, what are the linguistic traits that make some languages sound more pleasing than others? This paper addresses these two questions. We do so with results from two listener experiments that use speech samples from a bilingual Danish–Swedish speaker in a matched guise test, where the listeners are ‘previously unexposed’ students from central China. Our results indicate that listeners from …
Predicting mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects from multiple objective linguistic distance measures
This paper predicts the mutual intelligibility of 15 Chinese dialects from multiple objective distance measures. Empirical mutual intelligibility measures were obtained from functional intelligibility tests at the sentence level from 15 listeners for each of 15 Chinese dialects. We computed various proximity measures on the basis of shared phonemes and tones in the sound inventories of the 15 dialects. Next, Levenshtein (string-edit) distance mea…
Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested
Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects tested functionally
Chinese dialectologists agree that there is a primary split in Sinitic dialects into a Mandarin branch and a Southern (non-Mandarin) branch, each comprising a number of (sub)groups. In this paper we will adopt the taxonomy proposed by the authoritative Language Atlas of China. We target 15 dialects, which are related as
Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects
Preview this article: Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects: Predicting judgments from objective measures, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/avt.24.21tan-1.gif
Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested
Predicting mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects from multiple objective linguistic distance measures
This paper predicts the mutual intelligibility of 15 Chinese dialects from multiple objective distance measures. Empirical mutual intelligibility measures were obtained from functional intelligibility tests at the sentence level from 15 listeners for each of 15 Chinese dialects. We computed various proximity measures on the basis of shared phonemes and tones in the sound inventories of the 15 dialects. Next, Levenshtein (string-edit) distance mea…
Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects
Preview this article: Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects: Predicting judgments from objective measures, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/avt.24.21tan-1.gif
Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects tested functionally
Chinese dialectologists agree that there is a primary split in Sinitic dialects into a Mandarin branch and a Southern (non-Mandarin) branch, each comprising a number of (sub)groups. In this paper we will adopt the taxonomy proposed by the authoritative Language Atlas of China. We target 15 dialects, which are related as
Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested
Predicting mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects from multiple objective linguistic distance measures
This paper predicts the mutual intelligibility of 15 Chinese dialects from multiple objective distance measures. Empirical mutual intelligibility measures were obtained from functional intelligibility tests at the sentence level from 15 listeners for each of 15 Chinese dialects. We computed various proximity measures on the basis of shared phonemes and tones in the sound inventories of the 15 dialects. Next, Levenshtein (string-edit) distance mea…
Is Swedish more beautiful than Danish? Matched guise investigations with unknown languages
Are some languages universally seen as beautiful? And if so, what are the linguistic traits that make some languages sound more pleasing than others? This paper addresses these two questions. We do so with results from two listener experiments that use speech samples from a bilingual Danish–Swedish speaker in a matched guise test, where the listeners are ‘previously unexposed’ students from central China. Our results indicate that listeners from …
Chinese “Dialects” and European “Languages
In this article, we tested some specific claims made in the literature on relative distances among European languages and among Chinese dialects, suggesting that some language varieties within the Sinitic family traditionally called dialects are, in fact, more linguistically distant from one another than some European varieties that are traditionally called languages. More generally, we examined whether distances among varieties within and across…
Linguistics (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Linguistic Variation and Morphology (5 obras) · Philosophy (5 obras) · Psychology (5 obras) · Natural language processing (4 obras) · Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 obras) · Artificial Intelligence (2 obras) · Language and cultural evolution (2 obras) · Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 obras)