Jasper Krommendijk
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 4092038 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Jasper Krommendijk |
| NOMBRES | Jasper |
| APELLIDO | Krommendijk |
| FIRMA | KROMMENDIJK J |
| AFILIACIONES | Maastricht University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3371-7580 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 8 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 8 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 8 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2014 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Luxembourg Has Spoken
The last decade has witnessed a substantial increase in case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereafter: ECJ or Court) concerning the rule of law. This expansion in case law reflects the significant challenges to the rule of law that have arisen in recent years. Several EU member states have implemented measures that severely undermine judicial independence and the protection of fundamental rights. The relative inaction of EU in…
Small states and coalition building in extremis
Contains fulltext : 307061.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access
Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
The EU prides itself on having created a legal system that puts the individual at its centre. Individuals benefit from a broad range of fundamental rights that protect them against EU power. However, to vindicate their rights against the EU, they have to make use of a remedies system as old as the EU itself. Unsurprisingly, with EU power growing and evolving, it also is increasingly difficult to challenge. This book critically examines the EU's r…
To intervene or not to intervene
Little is known about the (legal) possibilities and practice of intervention before the Court of Justice of the EU, despite a seeming growth in strategic litigation by NGOs, especially in areas such as migration and the environment. This article fills this gap by looking at the legal framework as well as conducting empirical research. It also compares the practice of intervention before the CJEU with its counterpart in Strasbourg, the European Co…
Less is more
The UN human rights treaty body system will again be under scrutiny for reform in 2020, after more than a decade of fruitless attempts to strengthen it. This column explores some proposals for how the treaty bodies and the process of State reporting can become more effective. The central idea is that treaty bodies need to be more selective and avoid duplication to stop the current negative vicious circle and evaluation fatigue. To make the dialog…
From Opinion 2/13 to Avotiņš
With its recent judgment in Avotiņš v Latvia of May 2016, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) arrived at its long-awaited answer to Opinion 2/13 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of December 2014.1 In this Opinion, the CJEU prevented the European Union's (EU) accession to the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) by declaring the agreement on the accession of the EU to the ECHR incompatible with the specific charact…
The (In)effectiveness of UN Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations
The actual domestic impact of the reporting process under UN human rights treaties on the ground has hardly been studied. This article attempts to fill this gap by examining the effectiveness of the recommendations of the UN human rights treaty bodies in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland. The aim of this article is to gather insights in the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the recommendations by focusing on the differences b…
Finnish Exceptionalism at Play? The Effectiveness of the Recommendations of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in Finland
Finland is generally regarded as a country especially inducive to the impact and effectiveness of international human rights law. This article examines whether this is also the case for the recommendations of UN human rights treaty bodies issued in the context of the process of state reporting. The objective is to elucidate the factors that contribute to the (in)effectiveness of these recommendations by contrasting the Finnish experience with tha…
The (In)effectiveness of UN Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations
The actual domestic impact of the reporting process under UN human rights treaties on the ground has hardly been studied. This article attempts to fill this gap by examining the effectiveness of the recommendations of the UN human rights treaty bodies in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland. The aim of this article is to gather insights in the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the recommendations by focusing on the differences b…
Small states and coalition building in extremis
Contains fulltext : 307061.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access
Less is more
The UN human rights treaty body system will again be under scrutiny for reform in 2020, after more than a decade of fruitless attempts to strengthen it. This column explores some proposals for how the treaty bodies and the process of State reporting can become more effective. The central idea is that treaty bodies need to be more selective and avoid duplication to stop the current negative vicious circle and evaluation fatigue. To make the dialog…
Finnish Exceptionalism at Play? The Effectiveness of the Recommendations of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in Finland
Finland is generally regarded as a country especially inducive to the impact and effectiveness of international human rights law. This article examines whether this is also the case for the recommendations of UN human rights treaty bodies issued in the context of the process of state reporting. The objective is to elucidate the factors that contribute to the (in)effectiveness of these recommendations by contrasting the Finnish experience with tha…
The (In)effectiveness of UN Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations
The actual domestic impact of the reporting process under UN human rights treaties on the ground has hardly been studied. This article attempts to fill this gap by examining the effectiveness of the recommendations of the UN human rights treaty bodies in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland. The aim of this article is to gather insights in the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the recommendations by focusing on the differences b…
From Opinion 2/13 to Avotiņš
With its recent judgment in Avotiņš v Latvia of May 2016, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) arrived at its long-awaited answer to Opinion 2/13 of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of December 2014.1 In this Opinion, the CJEU prevented the European Union's (EU) accession to the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) by declaring the agreement on the accession of the EU to the ECHR incompatible with the specific charact…
Less is more
The UN human rights treaty body system will again be under scrutiny for reform in 2020, after more than a decade of fruitless attempts to strengthen it. This column explores some proposals for how the treaty bodies and the process of State reporting can become more effective. The central idea is that treaty bodies need to be more selective and avoid duplication to stop the current negative vicious circle and evaluation fatigue. To make the dialog…
To intervene or not to intervene
Little is known about the (legal) possibilities and practice of intervention before the Court of Justice of the EU, despite a seeming growth in strategic litigation by NGOs, especially in areas such as migration and the environment. This article fills this gap by looking at the legal framework as well as conducting empirical research. It also compares the practice of intervention before the CJEU with its counterpart in Strasbourg, the European Co…
Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
The EU prides itself on having created a legal system that puts the individual at its centre. Individuals benefit from a broad range of fundamental rights that protect them against EU power. However, to vindicate their rights against the EU, they have to make use of a remedies system as old as the EU itself. Unsurprisingly, with EU power growing and evolving, it also is increasingly difficult to challenge. This book critically examines the EU's r…
Luxembourg Has Spoken
The last decade has witnessed a substantial increase in case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereafter: ECJ or Court) concerning the rule of law. This expansion in case law reflects the significant challenges to the rule of law that have arisen in recent years. Several EU member states have implemented measures that severely undermine judicial independence and the protection of fundamental rights. The relative inaction of EU in…
Small states and coalition building in extremis
Contains fulltext : 307061.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access
Political science (7 obras) · European and International Law Studies (6 obras) · Law (6 obras) · Human rights (5 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Law and economics (5 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 obras) · European union (3 obras) · European Union Policy and Governance (3 obras)