Hayley Walker
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 4097123 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Hayley Walker |
| NOMBRES | Hayley |
| APELLIDO | Walker |
| FIRMA | WALKER H |
| AFILIACIONES | Leuven International and European Studies |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1368-1338 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 23 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2017 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Forum
The concepts of crisis and contestation have become ubiquitous in International Relations (IR) and beyond. Indeed, crisis and contestation are theoretical terms that crystallize the current challenges to global governance and international orders. At the same time, not only the definition of each term individually but also especially of their relationship remains opaque and has not yet encouraged cross-disciplinary debates within and beyond IR. T…
Legitimating non-state actor engagement in global climate governance
Our study examines how international organizations seek to legitimate non-state actor engagement to elite audiences, using the secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as an illustrative case. We employ the prism of legitimation, a process whereby international organizations justify their institutional designs, decision-making procedures and policy outcomes with a view to enhancing legitimacy. We unpack legitimation along two …
What Drives Trust in Chairs of Multilateral Negotiations? Rational, Relational, Reputational, and Emergent Trust
Trust is the condition on which multilateral delegates permit chairs to play a more active and substantive role in mediating a positive outcome, for example, through tabling compromise proposals. What drives this trust? Whereas the development of trust between negotiating states has been subject to considerable analysis, the negotiator–chair dynamic has received remarkably little attention. This article contributes to filling this gap and in so d…
Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations
Trust in the chairs of global negotiations is a decisive factor facilitating successful outcomes. When negotiators trust the chair, they allow her to go beyond her formal procedural role by acting as a mediator, fostering the reaching of agreement. Negotiating parties must consent to a chair assuming substantive mediation functions. They cede parts of their control over the process to the chair when they are confident that the chair is competent …
Policy Infusion Through Capacity Building and Project Interaction
Capacity-building projects can be a vehicle for fostering policy diffusion. They should not, however, be considered as exclusively externally driven; the receiving jurisdiction’s receptiveness and leverage to steer the design of those projects can be crucial factors, shaping the process of infusing different external policy expertise and experiences into domestic policy design and implementation. This article shows that the Chinese National Devel…
Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations
Trust in the chairs of global negotiations is a decisive factor facilitating successful outcomes. When negotiators trust the chair, they allow her to go beyond her formal procedural role by acting as a mediator, fostering the reaching of agreement. Negotiating parties must consent to a chair assuming substantive mediation functions. They cede parts of their control over the process to the chair when they are confident that the chair is competent …
Policy Infusion Through Capacity Building and Project Interaction
Capacity-building projects can be a vehicle for fostering policy diffusion. They should not, however, be considered as exclusively externally driven; the receiving jurisdiction’s receptiveness and leverage to steer the design of those projects can be crucial factors, shaping the process of infusing different external policy expertise and experiences into domestic policy design and implementation. This article shows that the Chinese National Devel…
Legitimating non-state actor engagement in global climate governance
Our study examines how international organizations seek to legitimate non-state actor engagement to elite audiences, using the secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as an illustrative case. We employ the prism of legitimation, a process whereby international organizations justify their institutional designs, decision-making procedures and policy outcomes with a view to enhancing legitimacy. We unpack legitimation along two …
What Drives Trust in Chairs of Multilateral Negotiations? Rational, Relational, Reputational, and Emergent Trust
Trust is the condition on which multilateral delegates permit chairs to play a more active and substantive role in mediating a positive outcome, for example, through tabling compromise proposals. What drives this trust? Whereas the development of trust between negotiating states has been subject to considerable analysis, the negotiator–chair dynamic has received remarkably little attention. This article contributes to filling this gap and in so d…
Policy Infusion Through Capacity Building and Project Interaction
Capacity-building projects can be a vehicle for fostering policy diffusion. They should not, however, be considered as exclusively externally driven; the receiving jurisdiction’s receptiveness and leverage to steer the design of those projects can be crucial factors, shaping the process of infusing different external policy expertise and experiences into domestic policy design and implementation. This article shows that the Chinese National Devel…
Why Do Only Some Chairs Act as Successful Mediators? Trust in Chairs of Global Climate Negotiations
Trust in the chairs of global negotiations is a decisive factor facilitating successful outcomes. When negotiators trust the chair, they allow her to go beyond her formal procedural role by acting as a mediator, fostering the reaching of agreement. Negotiating parties must consent to a chair assuming substantive mediation functions. They cede parts of their control over the process to the chair when they are confident that the chair is competent …
What Drives Trust in Chairs of Multilateral Negotiations? Rational, Relational, Reputational, and Emergent Trust
Trust is the condition on which multilateral delegates permit chairs to play a more active and substantive role in mediating a positive outcome, for example, through tabling compromise proposals. What drives this trust? Whereas the development of trust between negotiating states has been subject to considerable analysis, the negotiator–chair dynamic has received remarkably little attention. This article contributes to filling this gap and in so d…
Legitimating non-state actor engagement in global climate governance
Our study examines how international organizations seek to legitimate non-state actor engagement to elite audiences, using the secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as an illustrative case. We employ the prism of legitimation, a process whereby international organizations justify their institutional designs, decision-making procedures and policy outcomes with a view to enhancing legitimacy. We unpack legitimation along two …
Forum
The concepts of crisis and contestation have become ubiquitous in International Relations (IR) and beyond. Indeed, crisis and contestation are theoretical terms that crystallize the current challenges to global governance and international orders. At the same time, not only the definition of each term individually but also especially of their relationship remains opaque and has not yet encouraged cross-disciplinary debates within and beyond IR. T…
Computer Science (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Business (3 obras) · Process (computing (3 obras) · Sociology (3 obras) · Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 obras) · Corporate governance (2 obras) · Global governance (2 obras) · Law (2 obras) · Negotiation (2 obras)