Libby Jenke
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 4382926 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Libby Jenke |
| NOMBRES | Libby |
| APELLIDO | Jenke |
| FIRMA | JENKE L |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Houston |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2109-9391 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 9 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 75 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2017 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Attention and Political Choice
Most political science studies are, at root, about how people make decisions—how voters choose whether and for whom to vote, how prejudice influences political choices, and the effects of emotions and morals on political choice. However, what people are thinking during these decisions remains obscure; currently utilized methods leave us with a “black box” of decision making. Eye tracking offers a deeper insight into these processes by capturing r…
An Assessment of Citizens' Capacity for Prospective Issue Voting using Incentivized Forecasting
The ability of voters to predict the future policy-related behavior of candidates is essential to a well-functioning representative democracy. But existing studies have difficulty distinguishing between detailed knowledge of individual candidates and the use of coarse partisan cues when making prospective judgments. This article uses incentivized forecasting of candidates’ future interest group ratings, which allows for finer distinctions than ye…
An eye tracking study of gender biased information acquisition in candidate evaluation
Gender stereotypes may impact voters' candidate choices. But do gender stereotypes impact voters' attention when learning about candidates? This paper explores whether citizens take part in gender biased information acquisition when learning about women and men candidates. In an experiment, I use eye tracking to measure respondents' attention to gender stereotype‐consistent and inconsistent information. The results indicate that citizens do not d…
Odd Profiles in Conjoint Experimental Designs
Scholars often face a choice when designing conjoint experiments: to allow for or to exclude “odd” combinations of attribute levels in the randomized conjoint profiles shown to respondents (such as a profile of a Democratic candidate who does not support abortion rights or an individual who is a medical doctor but does not have a graduate degree). While previous work has studied the statistical and theoretical implications of this decision, there…
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
Attention distribution as a measure of issue salience
Introduction to the Special Issue
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments
Conjoint experiments are popular, but there is a paucity of research on respondents’ underlying decision-making processes. We leverage eye-tracking methodology and a series of conjoint experiments, administered to university students and local community members, to examine how respondents process information in conjoint surveys. There are two main findings. First, attribute importance measures inferred from the stated choice data are correlated w…
Theme and Variations
Since its establishment in 1963, the Correlates of War (COW) project has sought to build cumulative knowledge about international conflict through the application of the scientific method to the study of militarized interstate behavior. Early analyses from the COW project found substantial variation in the causal model of war across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, but COW scholars later sought to develop a general model of war that avoide…
Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments
Conjoint experiments are popular, but there is a paucity of research on respondents’ underlying decision-making processes. We leverage eye-tracking methodology and a series of conjoint experiments, administered to university students and local community members, to examine how respondents process information in conjoint surveys. There are two main findings. First, attribute importance measures inferred from the stated choice data are correlated w…
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
Theme and Variations
Since its establishment in 1963, the Correlates of War (COW) project has sought to build cumulative knowledge about international conflict through the application of the scientific method to the study of militarized interstate behavior. Early analyses from the COW project found substantial variation in the causal model of war across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, but COW scholars later sought to develop a general model of war that avoide…
Odd Profiles in Conjoint Experimental Designs
Scholars often face a choice when designing conjoint experiments: to allow for or to exclude “odd” combinations of attribute levels in the randomized conjoint profiles shown to respondents (such as a profile of a Democratic candidate who does not support abortion rights or an individual who is a medical doctor but does not have a graduate degree). While previous work has studied the statistical and theoretical implications of this decision, there…
An eye tracking study of gender biased information acquisition in candidate evaluation
Gender stereotypes may impact voters' candidate choices. But do gender stereotypes impact voters' attention when learning about candidates? This paper explores whether citizens take part in gender biased information acquisition when learning about women and men candidates. In an experiment, I use eye tracking to measure respondents' attention to gender stereotype‐consistent and inconsistent information. The results indicate that citizens do not d…
Introduction to the Special Issue
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Attention distribution as a measure of issue salience
Theme and Variations
Since its establishment in 1963, the Correlates of War (COW) project has sought to build cumulative knowledge about international conflict through the application of the scientific method to the study of militarized interstate behavior. Early analyses from the COW project found substantial variation in the causal model of war across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, but COW scholars later sought to develop a general model of war that avoide…
Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments
Conjoint experiments are popular, but there is a paucity of research on respondents’ underlying decision-making processes. We leverage eye-tracking methodology and a series of conjoint experiments, administered to university students and local community members, to examine how respondents process information in conjoint surveys. There are two main findings. First, attribute importance measures inferred from the stated choice data are correlated w…
Attention distribution as a measure of issue salience
Introduction to the Special Issue
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
Attention and Political Choice
Most political science studies are, at root, about how people make decisions—how voters choose whether and for whom to vote, how prejudice influences political choices, and the effects of emotions and morals on political choice. However, what people are thinking during these decisions remains obscure; currently utilized methods leave us with a “black box” of decision making. Eye tracking offers a deeper insight into these processes by capturing r…
An Assessment of Citizens' Capacity for Prospective Issue Voting using Incentivized Forecasting
The ability of voters to predict the future policy-related behavior of candidates is essential to a well-functioning representative democracy. But existing studies have difficulty distinguishing between detailed knowledge of individual candidates and the use of coarse partisan cues when making prospective judgments. This article uses incentivized forecasting of candidates’ future interest group ratings, which allows for finer distinctions than ye…
An eye tracking study of gender biased information acquisition in candidate evaluation
Gender stereotypes may impact voters' candidate choices. But do gender stereotypes impact voters' attention when learning about candidates? This paper explores whether citizens take part in gender biased information acquisition when learning about women and men candidates. In an experiment, I use eye tracking to measure respondents' attention to gender stereotype‐consistent and inconsistent information. The results indicate that citizens do not d…
Odd Profiles in Conjoint Experimental Designs
Scholars often face a choice when designing conjoint experiments: to allow for or to exclude “odd” combinations of attribute levels in the randomized conjoint profiles shown to respondents (such as a profile of a Democratic candidate who does not support abortion rights or an individual who is a medical doctor but does not have a graduate degree). While previous work has studied the statistical and theoretical implications of this decision, there…
Psychology (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Political science (5 obras) · Cognitive psychology (3 obras) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 obras) · Econometrics (3 obras) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 obras) · Economics (3 obras) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 obras) · Eye tracking (3 obras)