Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Katherine A Keith

Datos Biográficos

ID4393597
NOMBREKatherine A Keith
NOMBRESKatherine A
APELLIDOKeith
FIRMAKEITH K A
AFILIACIONESWilliams College
ORCID0000-0002-8101-4572
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS2
TOTAL DE CITAS3
TOTAL COMO AUTOR2
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2025
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2025
ÍNDICE H1
  • Let Me Just Interrupt You”

    Open Access•Erica Cai, A P Das Gupta et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Courts•2025•Referencias: 18

    Oral argument is the most public and visible part of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision-making process. Yet what if some advocates are treated differently before the Court solely because of aspects of their identity? In this work, we leverage a causal inference framework to quantify the effect of an advocate’s gender on interruptions of advocates at both the Court-level and the justice-level. Examining nearly four decades of U.S. Supreme Court ora…

  • Codebook LLMs

    Open Access•Andrew Halterman, Katherine A Keith•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2025•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 23

    Codebooks—documents that operationalize concepts and outline annotation procedures—are used almost universally by social scientists when coding political texts. To code these texts automatically, researchers are increasingly turning to generative large language models (LLMs). However, there is limited empirical evidence on whether “off-the-shelf” LLMs faithfully follow real-world codebook operationalizations and measure complex political construc…

  • Codebook LLMs

    Open Access•Andrew Halterman, Katherine A Keith•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2025•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 23

    Codebooks—documents that operationalize concepts and outline annotation procedures—are used almost universally by social scientists when coding political texts. To code these texts automatically, researchers are increasingly turning to generative large language models (LLMs). However, there is limited empirical evidence on whether “off-the-shelf” LLMs faithfully follow real-world codebook operationalizations and measure complex political construc…

  • Let Me Just Interrupt You”

    Open Access•Erica Cai, A P Das Gupta et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Law and Courts•2025•Referencias: 18

    Oral argument is the most public and visible part of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision-making process. Yet what if some advocates are treated differently before the Court solely because of aspects of their identity? In this work, we leverage a causal inference framework to quantify the effect of an advocate’s gender on interruptions of advocates at both the Court-level and the justice-level. Examining nearly four decades of U.S. Supreme Court ora…

  • Codebook LLMs

    Open Access•Andrew Halterman, Katherine A Keith•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2025•Citada por: 3•Referencias: 23

    Codebooks—documents that operationalize concepts and outline annotation procedures—are used almost universally by social scientists when coding political texts. To code these texts automatically, researchers are increasingly turning to generative large language models (LLMs). However, there is limited empirical evidence on whether “off-the-shelf” LLMs faithfully follow real-world codebook operationalizations and measure complex political construc…

Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 obras) · Artificial Intelligence in Law (1 obras) · Computer Science (1 obras) · Interrupt (1 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 obras) · Law (1 obras) · Law (1 obras) · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 obras) · Political science (1 obras) · Psychology (1 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae