Claus Halberg
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5009552 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Claus Halberg |
| NOMBRES | Claus |
| APELLIDO | Halberg |
| FIRMA | HALBERG C |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Bergen |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5152-0987 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 3 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2019 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Should we rethink or retire the nature/culture binary? Material ecofeminism, essentialism and coloniality
From the moment the material turn was launched as a new style of thought in feminist theory, it has offered itself as a highly pertinent rethinking and transgression of several deep-seated habits of thought in that domain. Above all, in and through its injunction to ‘take matter seriously’, it has called for a deeper exploration and affirmation of the corporeality of the (human) body that does not reduce it merely to a passive inscriptive surface…
Neurosexism, Neurofeminism, and Neurocentrism
Over the course of the last decade, a strand of feminist science scholarship has come together under the rubric of “neurofeminism”. One of the driving concerns for scholars in this area is to expose and criticize what is sometimes called “neurosexism”. This is a tendency among some neuroscientists, science writers and journalists to exaggerate cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sex differences and to pin gender stereotypes on allegedly innate …
Natur» er også et ord
I og med den «materielle vendingen» har feminismens tradisjonelt skeptiske holdning til naturbegrepet blitt erstattet av en naturnysgjerrighet og -entusiasme. Naturen skal ikke lenger forstås som kulturens passive, enhetlige og deterministiske motsetning, hevdes det, men snarere som dynamisk, mangfoldig og uforutsigbar – som et overskudd hinsides de rammene vi setter for den gjennom språk, vitenskap og teknikk. I denne artikkelen hevder jeg at en…
Do Brain Decoders Have an Ontological Mind of Their Own? Response to Nikolas Rose
In a recent article published in Body & Society, Nikolas Rose considers what he takes to be possible historical–ontological implications of recent developments in brain-decoding technologies. He argues that such technologies embody the premise that the brain is the real locus of mental states and processes, hence that a new materialist ontology of thought may be in the process of emerging through technological demonstration rather than through ph…
Natur» er også et ord
I og med den «materielle vendingen» har feminismens tradisjonelt skeptiske holdning til naturbegrepet blitt erstattet av en naturnysgjerrighet og -entusiasme. Naturen skal ikke lenger forstås som kulturens passive, enhetlige og deterministiske motsetning, hevdes det, men snarere som dynamisk, mangfoldig og uforutsigbar – som et overskudd hinsides de rammene vi setter for den gjennom språk, vitenskap og teknikk. I denne artikkelen hevder jeg at en…
Neurosexism, Neurofeminism, and Neurocentrism
Over the course of the last decade, a strand of feminist science scholarship has come together under the rubric of “neurofeminism”. One of the driving concerns for scholars in this area is to expose and criticize what is sometimes called “neurosexism”. This is a tendency among some neuroscientists, science writers and journalists to exaggerate cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sex differences and to pin gender stereotypes on allegedly innate …
Do Brain Decoders Have an Ontological Mind of Their Own? Response to Nikolas Rose
In a recent article published in Body & Society, Nikolas Rose considers what he takes to be possible historical–ontological implications of recent developments in brain-decoding technologies. He argues that such technologies embody the premise that the brain is the real locus of mental states and processes, hence that a new materialist ontology of thought may be in the process of emerging through technological demonstration rather than through ph…
Neurosexism, Neurofeminism, and Neurocentrism
Over the course of the last decade, a strand of feminist science scholarship has come together under the rubric of “neurofeminism”. One of the driving concerns for scholars in this area is to expose and criticize what is sometimes called “neurosexism”. This is a tendency among some neuroscientists, science writers and journalists to exaggerate cognitive, emotional, and behavioural sex differences and to pin gender stereotypes on allegedly innate …
Natur» er også et ord
I og med den «materielle vendingen» har feminismens tradisjonelt skeptiske holdning til naturbegrepet blitt erstattet av en naturnysgjerrighet og -entusiasme. Naturen skal ikke lenger forstås som kulturens passive, enhetlige og deterministiske motsetning, hevdes det, men snarere som dynamisk, mangfoldig og uforutsigbar – som et overskudd hinsides de rammene vi setter for den gjennom språk, vitenskap og teknikk. I denne artikkelen hevder jeg at en…
Should we rethink or retire the nature/culture binary? Material ecofeminism, essentialism and coloniality
From the moment the material turn was launched as a new style of thought in feminist theory, it has offered itself as a highly pertinent rethinking and transgression of several deep-seated habits of thought in that domain. Above all, in and through its injunction to ‘take matter seriously’, it has called for a deeper exploration and affirmation of the corporeality of the (human) body that does not reduce it merely to a passive inscriptive surface…
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (2 obras) · Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 obras) · Epistemology (2 obras) · Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 obras) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 obras) · Philosophy (2 obras) · Philosophy (2 obras) · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (2 obras) · Sociology (2 obras) · Chemistry (1 obras)