Angelique M Davis
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5053732 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Angelique M Davis |
| NOMBRES | Angelique M |
| APELLIDO | Davis |
| FIRMA | DAVIS A M |
| AFILIACIONES | Political Science, Seattle University, Seattle, WA, USA |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0270-4055 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 36 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2012 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2019 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Intersectionality
Intersectionality as a framework and praxis has gathered significance in law and the social sciences over the past 20 years. This article begins by reviewing how intersectionality has been conceptualized, as well as the implications of varying definitions attributed to intersectionality. We then explore applications of intersectionality, first in research that focuses on uncovering processes of differentiation and systems of inequality across a r…
Racial gaslighting
How does white supremacy – the systemic covert and overt version – remain inextricably woven into the ideological fabric of the United States? We argue that racial gaslighting – the political, social, economic and cultural process that perpetuates and normalizes a white supremacist reality through pathologizing those who resist – offers a framework to understand its maintenance in the United States. Racial gaslighting is a process that relies on …
Apologies, Reparations, and the Continuing Legacy of the European Slave Trade in the United States
Since Virginia’s legislative resolution apologizing for slavery in 2007, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina as well as the U.S. House and Senate passed unprecedented legislative resolutions apologizing for their role in the perpetuation of enslavement. This article analyzes the apology resolutions of eight states as well as those of the U.S. House and Senate to argue that their failure to recognize the h…
Racial Reconciliation or Retreat? How Legislative Resolutions Apologizing for Slavery Promulgate White Supremacy
UNPRECEDENTED legislative resolutions apologize for the perpetuation of slavery and call for racial healing and reconciliation. Although the text of each resolution varies, they all fail to provide any form of concrete remedial measures. Building upon work in political science, legal scholarship, and critical race theory, this article provides an interest-convergence analysis (Bell 1980) of the US House, Senate and seven state legislative resolut…
Racial gaslighting
How does white supremacy – the systemic covert and overt version – remain inextricably woven into the ideological fabric of the United States? We argue that racial gaslighting – the political, social, economic and cultural process that perpetuates and normalizes a white supremacist reality through pathologizing those who resist – offers a framework to understand its maintenance in the United States. Racial gaslighting is a process that relies on …
Intersectionality
Intersectionality as a framework and praxis has gathered significance in law and the social sciences over the past 20 years. This article begins by reviewing how intersectionality has been conceptualized, as well as the implications of varying definitions attributed to intersectionality. We then explore applications of intersectionality, first in research that focuses on uncovering processes of differentiation and systems of inequality across a r…
Apologies, Reparations, and the Continuing Legacy of the European Slave Trade in the United States
Since Virginia’s legislative resolution apologizing for slavery in 2007, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina as well as the U.S. House and Senate passed unprecedented legislative resolutions apologizing for their role in the perpetuation of enslavement. This article analyzes the apology resolutions of eight states as well as those of the U.S. House and Senate to argue that their failure to recognize the h…
Racial Reconciliation or Retreat? How Legislative Resolutions Apologizing for Slavery Promulgate White Supremacy
UNPRECEDENTED legislative resolutions apologize for the perpetuation of slavery and call for racial healing and reconciliation. Although the text of each resolution varies, they all fail to provide any form of concrete remedial measures. Building upon work in political science, legal scholarship, and critical race theory, this article provides an interest-convergence analysis (Bell 1980) of the US House, Senate and seven state legislative resolut…
Apologies, Reparations, and the Continuing Legacy of the European Slave Trade in the United States
Since Virginia’s legislative resolution apologizing for slavery in 2007, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina as well as the U.S. House and Senate passed unprecedented legislative resolutions apologizing for their role in the perpetuation of enslavement. This article analyzes the apology resolutions of eight states as well as those of the U.S. House and Senate to argue that their failure to recognize the h…
Racial gaslighting
How does white supremacy – the systemic covert and overt version – remain inextricably woven into the ideological fabric of the United States? We argue that racial gaslighting – the political, social, economic and cultural process that perpetuates and normalizes a white supremacist reality through pathologizing those who resist – offers a framework to understand its maintenance in the United States. Racial gaslighting is a process that relies on …
Intersectionality
Intersectionality as a framework and praxis has gathered significance in law and the social sciences over the past 20 years. This article begins by reviewing how intersectionality has been conceptualized, as well as the implications of varying definitions attributed to intersectionality. We then explore applications of intersectionality, first in research that focuses on uncovering processes of differentiation and systems of inequality across a r…
Law (4 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Politics (3 obras) · Sociology (3 obras) · Criminology (2 obras) · Gender Studies (2 obras) · Gender Studies (2 obras) · Legislature (2 obras) · Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 obras)