Robert Lowry Clinton
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5202140 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Robert Lowry Clinton |
| NOMBRES | Robert Lowry |
| APELLIDO | Clinton |
| FIRMA | CLINTON R L |
| AFILIACIONES | Southern Illinois University |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 16 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1990 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1999 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
God and Man in the Law
In a wide-ranging study based on legal history, political theory, and philosophical ideas going all the way back to Plato and Roman law, Robert Clinton challenges current faith in an activist judiciary. Claiming that a human-centered Constitution leads to government by reductive moral theory and illegitimate judicial review, he advocates a return to traditional jurisprudence and a God-centered Constitution grounded in English common law and its p…
God and Man in the Law
Journal Article God and Man in the Law: The Foundations of Anglo-American Jurisprudence Get access Clinton Robert Lowry, God and Man in the Law: The Foundations of Anglo-American Jurisprudence. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997. xiv, 293 pp. $35.00. Herman Belz Herman Belz University of Maryland, College Park Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 42, Issue 3, Ju…
Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause
Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause
The still-influential progressive interpretation of American constitutional history conceives the property-oriented judicial activism of the Supreme Court in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries (the era of laissez faire) to have been a natural and logical outgrowth of similar orientations on the Marshall and Taney Courts. It is contended here that the progressive theory is rooted in a serious misinterpretation of the early Supreme C…
John Marshall's Federalism
John Marshall's Federalism
Original Intentions
Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review
Journal Article Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review Get access Clinton Robert Lowry, Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1989. XII, 310 pp. $35.00. Thomas B. McAffee Thomas B. McAffee Southern Illinois University School of Law Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 36, Issue 3, July 1992, Pages 399–401, https://doi.org/…
Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution
The Aristocracy of the Long Robe
Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review
Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause
The still-influential progressive interpretation of American constitutional history conceives the property-oriented judicial activism of the Supreme Court in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries (the era of laissez faire) to have been a natural and logical outgrowth of similar orientations on the Marshall and Taney Courts. It is contended here that the progressive theory is rooted in a serious misinterpretation of the early Supreme C…
God and Man in the Law
In a wide-ranging study based on legal history, political theory, and philosophical ideas going all the way back to Plato and Roman law, Robert Clinton challenges current faith in an activist judiciary. Claiming that a human-centered Constitution leads to government by reductive moral theory and illegitimate judicial review, he advocates a return to traditional jurisprudence and a God-centered Constitution grounded in English common law and its p…
Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution
John Marshall's Federalism
The Aristocracy of the Long Robe
Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution
Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review
Journal Article Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review Get access Clinton Robert Lowry, Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1989. XII, 310 pp. $35.00. Thomas B. McAffee Thomas B. McAffee Southern Illinois University School of Law Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 36, Issue 3, July 1992, Pages 399–401, https://doi.org/…
Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause
Judicial Review, Nationalism, and the Commerce Clause
The still-influential progressive interpretation of American constitutional history conceives the property-oriented judicial activism of the Supreme Court in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries (the era of laissez faire) to have been a natural and logical outgrowth of similar orientations on the Marshall and Taney Courts. It is contended here that the progressive theory is rooted in a serious misinterpretation of the early Supreme C…
John Marshall's Federalism
John Marshall's Federalism
Original Intentions
Game Theory, Legal History, and the Origins of Judicial Review
God and Man in the Law
Journal Article God and Man in the Law: The Foundations of Anglo-American Jurisprudence Get access Clinton Robert Lowry, God and Man in the Law: The Foundations of Anglo-American Jurisprudence. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997. xiv, 293 pp. $35.00. Herman Belz Herman Belz University of Maryland, College Park Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 42, Issue 3, Ju…
God and Man in the Law
In a wide-ranging study based on legal history, political theory, and philosophical ideas going all the way back to Plato and Roman law, Robert Clinton challenges current faith in an activist judiciary. Claiming that a human-centered Constitution leads to government by reductive moral theory and illegitimate judicial review, he advocates a return to traditional jurisprudence and a God-centered Constitution grounded in English common law and its p…
Law (11 obras) · Law (11 obras) · Political science (11 obras) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 obras) · Law and economics (6 obras) · Politics (6 obras) · Sociology (6 obras) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 obras) · Judicial review (4 obras) · Philosophy (4 obras)