James Spensley
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5224201 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | James Spensley |
| NOMBRES | James |
| APELLIDO | Spensley |
| FIRMA | SPENSLEY J |
| AFILIACIONES | University of California, Davis |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 7 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 1 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1971 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1981 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Discipline stereotyping and evaluative attitudes among community mental health center staff
The Adjective Check List was administered to psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, and clinical psychologists on the staff of a university-operated community mental health center, to measure attitudes toward five mental health disciplines. Adjective stereotypes and evaluative attitudes were highly positive, although social workers tended to be more negative toward psychiatrists than toward the other disciplines. Cognitive and dynamic factors…
A patient's perspective on involuntary treatment
Patient satisfaction and involuntary treatment
Peer rating by a community mental health team
A peer rating system was devised in response to a request from members of a community mental health team for a positive method of self-evaluation. Team members rated each other three times at one month intervals. Reliability was high, and factor analysis generated two major dimensions--positive regard and competence--assessed by the rating instrument. Validity data are discussed, and applications of the method suggested
Feelings of the psychotherapist
Patients' Stated Preferences for Psychiatric Technicians or Psychiatrists as Primary Therapists—a Comparative Study
The adolescent transvestite on a psychiatric service
The adolescent transvestite on a psychiatric service
Patients' Stated Preferences for Psychiatric Technicians or Psychiatrists as Primary Therapists—a Comparative Study
Feelings of the psychotherapist
Peer rating by a community mental health team
A peer rating system was devised in response to a request from members of a community mental health team for a positive method of self-evaluation. Team members rated each other three times at one month intervals. Reliability was high, and factor analysis generated two major dimensions--positive regard and competence--assessed by the rating instrument. Validity data are discussed, and applications of the method suggested
Patient satisfaction and involuntary treatment
Discipline stereotyping and evaluative attitudes among community mental health center staff
The Adjective Check List was administered to psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, and clinical psychologists on the staff of a university-operated community mental health center, to measure attitudes toward five mental health disciplines. Adjective stereotypes and evaluative attitudes were highly positive, although social workers tended to be more negative toward psychiatrists than toward the other disciplines. Cognitive and dynamic factors…
A patient's perspective on involuntary treatment
Psychology (7 obras) · Psychiatry (4 obras) · Social Psychology (4 obras) · Clinical Psychology (3 obras) · Mental health (3 obras) · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 obras) · Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 obras) · Developmental psychology (2 obras) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 obras) · Medicine (2 obras)