Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Zachary Munn

Datos Biográficos

ID5574631
NOMBREZachary Munn
NOMBRESZachary
APELLIDOMunn
FIRMAMUNN Z
AFILIACIONESThe University of Adelaide
ORCID0000-0002-7091-5842
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS15
TOTAL DE CITAS0
OBRAS COMO AUTOR15
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2014
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2025
ÍNDICE H0
  • Understanding the Determinants of Use of the Australian Guide to Diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

    Open Access•Natasha Reid, Jayden Logan et al.•ARTICLE•Drug and Alcohol Review•2025

  • Scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Micah DJ Peters et al.•CHAPTER•JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis•2024

  • The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials

    Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    JBI recently began the process of updating and revising its suite of critical appraisal tools to ensure that these tools remain compatible with recent developments within risk of bias science. Following a rigorous development process led by the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group, this paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. This paper also presents practical guidance…

  • Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

    Donald Pollock, Danielle Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…

  • What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

    Zachary Munn, Donald Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2022

    Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definit…

  • Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

    Micah D J Peters, Christina Godfrey et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2022

  • Undertaking a scoping review

    Open Access•Donald Pollock, Ellen Davies et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2021

  • Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • Chapter 11

    Micah D J Peters, Micah Peters et al.•CHAPTER•JBI Reviewer's Manual•2019

  • What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models

    Open Access•Stephen Harfield, Carol Davy et al.•ARTICLE•Globalization and Health•2018

    BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations have poorer health outcomes compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. The evolution of Indigenous primary health care services arose from mainstream health services being unable to adequately meet the needs of Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples often being excluded and marginalised from mainstream health services. Part of the solution has been to establish Indigenous specific primary health care …

  • Access to primary health care services for Indigenous peoples

    Open Access•Carol Davy, Stephen Harfield et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for Equity…•2016

  • Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data

    Zachary Munn, Sandeep Moola et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2015

  • The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Sandeep Moola et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Health…•2014

Sin obras prominentes en esta página.

  • The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Sandeep Moola et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Health…•2014

  • Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data

    Zachary Munn, Sandeep Moola et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2015

  • Access to primary health care services for Indigenous peoples

    Open Access•Carol Davy, Stephen Harfield et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for Equity…•2016

  • What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models

    Open Access•Stephen Harfield, Carol Davy et al.•ARTICLE•Globalization and Health•2018

    BACKGROUND: Indigenous populations have poorer health outcomes compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. The evolution of Indigenous primary health care services arose from mainstream health services being unable to adequately meet the needs of Indigenous communities and Indigenous peoples often being excluded and marginalised from mainstream health services. Part of the solution has been to establish Indigenous specific primary health care …

  • Chapter 11

    Micah D J Peters, Micah Peters et al.•CHAPTER•JBI Reviewer's Manual•2019

  • Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • Undertaking a scoping review

    Open Access•Donald Pollock, Ellen Davies et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2021

  • What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

    Zachary Munn, Donald Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2022

    Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definit…

  • Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

    Micah D J Peters, Christina Godfrey et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2022

  • The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials

    Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    JBI recently began the process of updating and revising its suite of critical appraisal tools to ensure that these tools remain compatible with recent developments within risk of bias science. Following a rigorous development process led by the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group, this paper presents the revised critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. This paper also presents practical guidance…

  • Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

    Donald Pollock, Danielle Pollock et al.•ARTICLE•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2023

    Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss wha…

  • Scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Micah DJ Peters et al.•CHAPTER•JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis•2024

  • Understanding the Determinants of Use of the Australian Guide to Diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

    Open Access•Natasha Reid, Jayden Logan et al.•ARTICLE•Drug and Alcohol Review•2025

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 obras) · Computer Science (6 obras) · Political science (5 obras) · Engineering (4 obras) · Health Policy Implementation Science (4 obras) · Medicine (4 obras) · Best practice (3 obras) · Data science (3 obras) · Management science (3 obras) · MEDLINE (3 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae