Céline Schöpfer
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 5710237 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Céline Schöpfer |
| NOMBRES | Céline |
| APELLIDO | Schöpfer |
| FIRMA | SCHÖPFER C |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Geneva |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5111-9245 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 6 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2021 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
The critical time for critical thinking
This paper addresses the complexity of critical thinking, a multifaceted concept that includes cognitive skills, knowledge, and dispositions. We argue that existing literature has largely overlooked the vital role of dispositions, which are essential for understanding why individuals engage in critical thinking. Therefore, at the heart of our research is the challenge of motivation: how can we best encourage individuals to engage in critical thin…
Deciding What to Believe or Deciding What to Do? An Empirical Investigation of the Folk Conception of Critical Thinking
This study investigates how the expression ‘critical thinking’ (CT) is understood and used by the general public in the United States, using the tools of experimental philosophy. Based on responses from 288 non‐philosopher participants, our findings suggest that CT is commonly associated with problem solving, decision making and logical analysis. This folk conception aligns more closely with psychological definitions than with philosophical accou…
Advice‐taking in carbon footprint assessments
In this pre‐registered experiment conducted in the Netherlands and Türkiye ( N total = 550), we investigated how the source of advice (peer vs. expert) influences people's decision‐making when assessing the carbon footprint of a flight between two cities. We also examined whether this effect was influenced by their conspiracy mentality, collective narcissism, epistemic individualism, and climate change scepticism. Our findings suggest that people…
Delving into depth
We sometimes say about certain things (such as philosophical questions) that they are ‘deep’ or ‘profound’. But what does it mean exactly? Surprisingly, philosophers have been quite silent on this topic and there is neither consensual nor prominent conceptual analysis of ‘depth’. After surveying different proposals that have tried to capture depth in terms of explanatory depth, subject matter, emotional impact, understanding or complexity, we pre…
What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research
In psychological research, conspiracy theories are often defined as explanations of events involving the hidden action of a malevolent group. Such a definition raises a false negative problem, as it does not capture conspiracy theories that are not about events. It also raises a false positive problem because it categorises any conspiracy-based explanation as a conspiracy theory, even though distinguishing conspiracy theories from other conspirac…
Anonymat et comportement en ligne
L’anonymat ou du moins le brouillage des identités est l’une des composantes majeures de la communication digitale. Dans ce travail, nous nous sommes intéressés à la désinhibition des propos et des comportements que le digital induit, en particulier sur une plateforme de chat complètement anonyme et prisée des universitaires : Jodel. Au moyen d’un questionnaire diffusé en ligne, nous avons interrogé les produsagers de cette application afin d’éva…
Sin obras prominentes en esta página.
Anonymat et comportement en ligne
L’anonymat ou du moins le brouillage des identités est l’une des composantes majeures de la communication digitale. Dans ce travail, nous nous sommes intéressés à la désinhibition des propos et des comportements que le digital induit, en particulier sur une plateforme de chat complètement anonyme et prisée des universitaires : Jodel. Au moyen d’un questionnaire diffusé en ligne, nous avons interrogé les produsagers de cette application afin d’éva…
What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research
In psychological research, conspiracy theories are often defined as explanations of events involving the hidden action of a malevolent group. Such a definition raises a false negative problem, as it does not capture conspiracy theories that are not about events. It also raises a false positive problem because it categorises any conspiracy-based explanation as a conspiracy theory, even though distinguishing conspiracy theories from other conspirac…
Delving into depth
We sometimes say about certain things (such as philosophical questions) that they are ‘deep’ or ‘profound’. But what does it mean exactly? Surprisingly, philosophers have been quite silent on this topic and there is neither consensual nor prominent conceptual analysis of ‘depth’. After surveying different proposals that have tried to capture depth in terms of explanatory depth, subject matter, emotional impact, understanding or complexity, we pre…
Advice‐taking in carbon footprint assessments
In this pre‐registered experiment conducted in the Netherlands and Türkiye ( N total = 550), we investigated how the source of advice (peer vs. expert) influences people's decision‐making when assessing the carbon footprint of a flight between two cities. We also examined whether this effect was influenced by their conspiracy mentality, collective narcissism, epistemic individualism, and climate change scepticism. Our findings suggest that people…
The critical time for critical thinking
This paper addresses the complexity of critical thinking, a multifaceted concept that includes cognitive skills, knowledge, and dispositions. We argue that existing literature has largely overlooked the vital role of dispositions, which are essential for understanding why individuals engage in critical thinking. Therefore, at the heart of our research is the challenge of motivation: how can we best encourage individuals to engage in critical thin…
Deciding What to Believe or Deciding What to Do? An Empirical Investigation of the Folk Conception of Critical Thinking
This study investigates how the expression ‘critical thinking’ (CT) is understood and used by the general public in the United States, using the tools of experimental philosophy. Based on responses from 288 non‐philosopher participants, our findings suggest that CT is commonly associated with problem solving, decision making and logical analysis. This folk conception aligns more closely with psychological definitions than with philosophical accou…
Epistemology (3 obras) · Philosophy (3 obras) · Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 obras) · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 obras) · Psychology (2 obras) · Skepticism (2 obras) · Advice (programming) (1 obras) · Art (1 obras) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 obras) · Carbon Footprint (1 obras)