Wolfgang Glänzel

Datos Biográficos

ID	5928836
NOMBRE	Wolfgang Glänzel
NOMBRES	Wolfgang
APELLIDO	Glänzel
FIRMA	GLÄNZEL W
AFILIACIONES	Library and Information Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
ORCID	0000-0001-7529-5198
VERIFICADO	Sí
TOTAL DE OBRAS	33
TOTAL DE CITAS	5
TOTAL COMO AUTOR	27
TOTAL COMO EDITOR	7
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN	1985
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN	2026
ÍNDICE H	2

A framework for the responsible use of bibliometrics in research evaluation
Open AccessCinzia Daraio, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2026
Operationalising responsible use of bibliometrics in research evaluation insights obtained from policy application of scientometrics at three European universities
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, Juan Gorraiz et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2026
Evolution of public funding for collaborative health research towards higher-level patient-oriented research
Open AccessDavid Fajardo-Ortiz, Bart Thijs et al.ARTICLEQuantitative Science Studies2026
Public research funding agencies increasingly seek to steer health research toward higher levels of translation and societal relevance. Yet it remains unclear to what extent such policy shifts are effectively implemented and reflected in funded projects and scientific outputs. This study examines evolution and changes in the orientation of health research portfolios since 2008 within European funding (Framework Programmes FP7 and Horizon 2020 fun…
Hildrun Kretschmer (1947–2024)
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, Theo Kretschmer et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2025
Two sides of the same coin? Citation obsolescence and impact of different publication types and subject fields
Open AccessPei-Shan Chi, Wolfgang GlänzelARTICLEScientometrics2024
Obituary
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, A SchubertARTICLEScientometrics2022
The 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics
Open AccessGeorg Kraus, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
Obituary
Open AccessCinzia Daraio, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
Obituary by Henk F. Moed
An article-based cross-disciplinary study of reference literature for indicator improvement
Open AccessPei-Shan Chi, Wolfgang GlänzelARTICLEScientometrics2022
Eponyms in science
Open AccessA Schubert, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
Measuring the excellence contribution at the journal level
Open AccessJuan Gorraiz, Ursula Ulrych et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
The aim of this study is to analyze to which extent the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) reflects the amount of excellent publications contained in a journal in the corresponding subject category. We are introducing two percentile-based indicators in order to measure the excellence contribution at journal level. Calculations of these indicators have been carried out for twenty different Journal Citation Reports (JCR) subject categories to investigate …
Various aspects of interdisciplinarity in research and how to quantify and measure those
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, Koenraad DebackereARTICLEScientometrics2022
Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research
Open AccessLin Zhang, Gunnar Sivertsen et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2021
Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains
Open AccessYing Huang, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2021
The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science
Open AccessZhiqi Wang, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
Research strengths identified by esteem and bibliometric indicators
Open AccessJohannes Sorz, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
The identification of one’s own research strengths is of crucial importance for research administration at universities. In this case study, two different approaches were applied to the University of Vienna. The first relies on funding and rankings information as well as on other esteem indicators. The second is based on a bibliometric analysis of the publication output. We used two alternative clusterings for publications for the bibliometric an…
Commemorating Judit
Open AccessTibor Braun, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies
Open AccessLin Zhang, Wenjing Zhao et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
As of the middle of April 2020, the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has claimed more than 137,000 lives ( https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html ). Because of its extremely fast spreading, the attention of the global scientific community is now focusing on slowing down, containing and finally stopping the spread of this disease. This requires the concerted action of researchers and practitioners of many related fields, raising, as always in such si…
The big challenge of Scientometrics 2.0
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, Pei-Shan ChiARTICLEScientometrics2020
The 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics
Open AccessCinzia Daraio, Henk F Moed et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
[No abstract available]
Visualizing a field of research
Open AccessChaomei Chen, Min Song et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2019
Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals
Open AccessLin Zhang, R Rousseau et al.ARTICLEJournal of the Association for…2016
The objective of this article is to further the study of journal interdisciplinarity, or, more generally, knowledge integration at the level of individual articles. Interdisciplinarity is operationalized by the diversity of subject fields assigned to cited items in the article's reference list. Subject fields and subfields were obtained from the L euven‐ B udapest ( ECOOM ) subject‐classification scheme, while disciplinary diversity was measured …
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research
Open AccessCaroline S Wagner, Han Woo Park et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
Global collaboration continues to grow as a share of all scientific cooperation, measured as coauthorships of peer-reviewed, published papers. The percent of all scientific papers that are internationally coauthored has more than doubled in 20 years, and they account for all the growth in output among the scientifically advanced countries. Emerging countries, particularly China, have increased their participation in global science, in part by dou…
Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity
Open AccessAlfredo Yegros, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
This article analyses the effect of degree of interdisciplinarity on the citation impact of individual publications for four different scientific fields. We operationalise interdisciplinarity as disciplinary diversity in the references of a publication, and rather than treating interdisciplinarity as a monodimensional property, we investigate the separate effect of different aspects of diversity on citation impact: i.e. variety, balance and dispa…
Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers
Open AccessStefanie Haustein, Rodrigo Costas et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms--grouped under the term "altmetrics"--have recently been introduced as potential indicators of research impact. Despite their current popularity, there is a lack of information regarding the determinants of these metrics. Using publication and citation data from 1.3 million papers published in 2012 and covered in Thomson Reuters' Web of Science as well as social media counts from Altmetric.c…

Characterization and statistical test using truncated expectations for a class of skew distributions
Open AccessAndrás Telcs, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEMathematical Social Sciences1985Referencias: 12
National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations
Open AccessWolfgang GlänzelARTICLEScientometrics2001
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research
Henk F Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.BOOKHandbook of Quantitative Science…2004
This handbook offers a state-of-the-art overview of quantitative science and technology research. It focuses on the development and application of indicators derived from data on scientific or scholarly publications and patents. It comprises 34 chapters written by leading specialists in the various sub-domains. These chapters deal with theoretical and methodological issues, illustrate applications, and highlight their policy context and relevance…
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research
Henk F Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.BOOKHandbook of Quantitative Science…2005
Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship
Wolfgang Glänzel, A SchubertCHAPTERHandbook of Quantitative Science…2006
Co-authorship is one of the most tangible and well documented forms of scientific collaboration. Almost every aspect of scientific collaboration networks can be reliably tracked by analysing co-authorship networks by bibliometric methods. In the present study, scientific collaboration is considered both at individual and national levels, with special focus given to multinational collaborations. Both literature data and original results witnessed …
Bibliometric methods for detecting and analysing emerging research topics
Open AccessWolfgang GlänzelARTICLEEl Profesional de la Informacion2012Citada por: 2
This study gives an overview of the process of clustering scientific disciplines using hybrid methods, detecting and labelling emerging topics and analysing the results using bibliometrics methods. The hybrid clustering techniques are based on biblographic coupling and text-mining and 'core documents', and cross-citation links are used to identify emerging fields. The collaboration network of those countries that proved to be most active in the u…
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research
Open AccessCaroline S Wagner, Han Woo Park et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
Global collaboration continues to grow as a share of all scientific cooperation, measured as coauthorships of peer-reviewed, published papers. The percent of all scientific papers that are internationally coauthored has more than doubled in 20 years, and they account for all the growth in output among the scientifically advanced countries. Emerging countries, particularly China, have increased their participation in global science, in part by dou…
Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity
Open AccessAlfredo Yegros, Alfredo Yegros-Yegros et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
This article analyses the effect of degree of interdisciplinarity on the citation impact of individual publications for four different scientific fields. We operationalise interdisciplinarity as disciplinary diversity in the references of a publication, and rather than treating interdisciplinarity as a monodimensional property, we investigate the separate effect of different aspects of diversity on citation impact: i.e. variety, balance and dispa…
Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers
Open AccessStefanie Haustein, Rodrigo Costas et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms--grouped under the term "altmetrics"--have recently been introduced as potential indicators of research impact. Despite their current popularity, there is a lack of information regarding the determinants of these metrics. Using publication and citation data from 1.3 million papers published in 2012 and covered in Thomson Reuters' Web of Science as well as social media counts from Altmetric.c…
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
Open AccessVincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers' high profit margins. However, the share of scientific output published in the journals of these major publishers, as well as its evolution over time and across various disciplines, has not yet been analyzed. This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million document…
Interdisciplinarity and Impact
Open AccessJian Wang, Bart Thijs et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015
Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as the solution to today's challenging scientific and societal problems, but the relationship between interdisciplinary research and scientific impact is still unclear. This paper studies the association between the degree of interdisciplinarity and the number of citations at the paper level. Different from previous studies compositing various aspects of interdisciplinarity into a single indic…
The Diffusion of the Internet and the Increased Propensity of Teams to Transcend Institutional and National Borders
Anne E Winkler, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLERevue économique2015Citada por: 3Referencias: 3
Nous étudions, dans le cas des États-Unis, la relation entre l’exposition à l’Internet et l’évolution des collaborations nationales et internationales entre institutions académiques. Nous utilisons comme un indicateur de l’exposition à Internet le nombre des années depuis lesquelles ces institutions ont adopté un nom de domaine ( dns ). Nous avons, par ailleurs, collecté les données de toutes les publications indexées par l’ isi , dans les domain…
Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals
Open AccessLin Zhang, R Rousseau et al.ARTICLEJournal of the Association for…2016
The objective of this article is to further the study of journal interdisciplinarity, or, more generally, knowledge integration at the level of individual articles. Interdisciplinarity is operationalized by the diversity of subject fields assigned to cited items in the article's reference list. Subject fields and subfields were obtained from the L euven‐ B udapest ( ECOOM ) subject‐classification scheme, while disciplinary diversity was measured …
Visualizing a field of research
Open AccessChaomei Chen, Min Song et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2019
The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science
Open AccessZhiqi Wang, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
Research strengths identified by esteem and bibliometric indicators
Open AccessJohannes Sorz, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
The identification of one’s own research strengths is of crucial importance for research administration at universities. In this case study, two different approaches were applied to the University of Vienna. The first relies on funding and rankings information as well as on other esteem indicators. The second is based on a bibliometric analysis of the publication output. We used two alternative clusterings for publications for the bibliometric an…
Commemorating Judit
Open AccessTibor Braun, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies
Open AccessLin Zhang, Wenjing Zhao et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
As of the middle of April 2020, the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has claimed more than 137,000 lives ( https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html ). Because of its extremely fast spreading, the attention of the global scientific community is now focusing on slowing down, containing and finally stopping the spread of this disease. This requires the concerted action of researchers and practitioners of many related fields, raising, as always in such si…
The big challenge of Scientometrics 2.0
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, Pei-Shan ChiARTICLEScientometrics2020
The 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics
Open AccessCinzia Daraio, Henk F Moed et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2020
[No abstract available]
Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research
Open AccessLin Zhang, Gunnar Sivertsen et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2021
Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains
Open AccessYing Huang, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2021
Obituary
Open AccessWolfgang Glänzel, A SchubertARTICLEScientometrics2022
The 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics
Open AccessGeorg Kraus, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
Obituary
Open AccessCinzia Daraio, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2022
Obituary by Henk F. Moed