Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 6019652 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Bengt Gunnar Jonsson |
| NOMBRES | Bengt Gunnar |
| APELLIDO | Jonsson |
| FIRMA | JONSSON B G |
| AFILIACIONES | Mid Sweden University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7307-1940 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 3 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2016 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
The EU Nature Restoration Regulation offers new opportunities for resilient forests and sustainable forestry
This paper examines the EU Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR) as a novel framework aimed at promoting biodiversity, ecosystem services, sustainable forestry practices and resilient ecosystems. We highlight the Swedish forests’ pivotal role in realizing the NRR goals given the substantial forest area and forest value capital, as well as the urgent need for ecological restoration, diversified forest management, and climate change adaptation in for…
Reply to Comment on ‘Climate mitigation forestry—temporal trade-offs’
Climate mitigation forestry—temporal trade-offs
The 1.5 °C target for global warming calls for evaluating short-term (30–50 years) climate change mitigation with different forests usage. In the current scientific literature and in the public debate, there are contrasting views on how forests should be managed to maximize total climate benefit, including the use of products and changes in carbon pools. Three major factors influence the conclusions in different studies: (a) time horizon, (b) sit…
Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets
Loss of forest naturalness challenges the maintenance of green infrastructure (GI) for biodiversity conservation and delivery of diverse ecosystem services. Using the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi target #11 with its quantitative and qualitative criteria as a normative model, we aim at supporting landscape planning through a pioneering assessment of the extent to which existing amounts and spatial distributions of High Conservation V…
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management
Reviews of evidence are a vital means of summarising growing bodies of research. Systematic reviews (SRs) aim to reduce bias and increase reliability when summarising high priority and controversial topics. Similar to SRs, systematic maps (SMs) were developed in social sciences to reliably catalogue evidence on a specific subject. Rather than providing answers to specific questions of impacts, SMs aim to produce searchable databases of studies, a…
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management
Reviews of evidence are a vital means of summarising growing bodies of research. Systematic reviews (SRs) aim to reduce bias and increase reliability when summarising high priority and controversial topics. Similar to SRs, systematic maps (SMs) were developed in social sciences to reliably catalogue evidence on a specific subject. Rather than providing answers to specific questions of impacts, SMs aim to produce searchable databases of studies, a…
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management
Reviews of evidence are a vital means of summarising growing bodies of research. Systematic reviews (SRs) aim to reduce bias and increase reliability when summarising high priority and controversial topics. Similar to SRs, systematic maps (SMs) were developed in social sciences to reliably catalogue evidence on a specific subject. Rather than providing answers to specific questions of impacts, SMs aim to produce searchable databases of studies, a…
Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets
Loss of forest naturalness challenges the maintenance of green infrastructure (GI) for biodiversity conservation and delivery of diverse ecosystem services. Using the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Aichi target #11 with its quantitative and qualitative criteria as a normative model, we aim at supporting landscape planning through a pioneering assessment of the extent to which existing amounts and spatial distributions of High Conservation V…
Climate mitigation forestry—temporal trade-offs
The 1.5 °C target for global warming calls for evaluating short-term (30–50 years) climate change mitigation with different forests usage. In the current scientific literature and in the public debate, there are contrasting views on how forests should be managed to maximize total climate benefit, including the use of products and changes in carbon pools. Three major factors influence the conclusions in different studies: (a) time horizon, (b) sit…
Reply to Comment on ‘Climate mitigation forestry—temporal trade-offs’
The EU Nature Restoration Regulation offers new opportunities for resilient forests and sustainable forestry
This paper examines the EU Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR) as a novel framework aimed at promoting biodiversity, ecosystem services, sustainable forestry practices and resilient ecosystems. We highlight the Swedish forests’ pivotal role in realizing the NRR goals given the substantial forest area and forest value capital, as well as the urgent need for ecological restoration, diversified forest management, and climate change adaptation in for…
Forest Management and Policy (4 obras) · Climate change (3 obras) · Ecology (3 obras) · Environmental Science (3 obras) · Agroforestry (2 obras) · Ecosystem services (2 obras) · Environmental resource management (2 obras) · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 obras) · Forest management (2 obras) · Forest restoration (2 obras)